Comparison between dexmedetomidine and a combination of medetomidine-vatinoxan on muscle tissue saturation in privately-owned adult dogs undergoing intradermal testing.

This double-blinded randomized cross-over study compared the muscle tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) measured at the sartorius muscle after intramuscular (IM) injection of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (HCl) and co-administration of vatinoxan HCl, a peripheral α2-adrenoceptor antagonist, and medetomidine HCl in healthy privately-owned dogs undergoing intradermal testing (IDAT). After written owner consent, dogs received IM injections of either dexmedetomidine (0.5 mg/m2, DEX) or medetomidine (1 mg/m2) and vatinoxan (20 mg/m2) (MVX). Once sedated, intradermal injections were given on the lateral thorax of each dog, and the study was repeated with the alternative sedation on the opposite side one week later. At the end of the study, sedation was reversed with atipamezole (5 mg/m2). Depth of sedation, cardiopulmonary parameters, StO2, and rectal temperature were recorded and compared using mixed effect linear models (α ≤ 0.05). MVX achieved adequate sedation faster [median (interquartile range), 10 (8, 10) minutes] compared to DEX [18 (15, 22) minutes; hazard ratio = 7.44, p = 0.013), with higher scores at 10- and 15-min post-injection. StO2 was significantly reduced for 30 min after injection (p < 0.001), independently of the treatment (p = 0.68). Cardiopulmonary variables favored MVX. However, higher heart rate did not correlate with improved StO2. There was no difference in either subjective or objective assessment of the wheal size between sedations (p > 0.05). Both sedation protocols, MVX and DEX, were deemed suitable for IDAT in dogs, with mild reductions in StO2 measured at the sartorius muscle that were not significantly different between treatments.

Analytical Performance of a 15-Gene Prognostic Assay for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Using RNA-Stabilized Tissue.

A 15-gene prognostic signature for early-stage, completely resected, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, (which distinguishes between patients with good and poor prognoses) was clinically validated in prior studies. To achieve operational efficiencies, this study was designed to evaluate the assay's performance in RNA-stabilized tissue as an alternative to the fresh-frozen tissue format originally used to develop the assay. The percent concordance between matched tissue formats was 84% (95% Wilson CI, 70%-92%), a level of agreement comparable to the inherent reproducibility of the assay observed within biological replicates of fresh-frozen tissue. Furthermore, the analytical performance of the assay using the RNA-stabilized tissue format was evaluated. When compared to an accredited reference laboratory, the clinical laboratory achieved a concordance of 94% (95% Wilson CI, 81%-98%), and there was no evidence of bias between the laboratories. The lower limit of quantitation for the target RNA concentration was confirmed to be, at most, 12.5 ng/µL. The assay reportable range defined in terms of risk score units was determined to be -4.295 to 4.210. In a large-scale precision study, the assay showed high reproducibility and repeatability. When subjected to a maximal amount of genomic DNA, a potential contaminant, the assay still produced the expected results. The 15-gene signature was confirmed to produce reliable results and, thus, is suitable for its intended use.