A study design to investigate the effect of short-form Sun-style Tai Chi in improving functional exercise capacity, physical performance, balance and health related quality of life in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

UNLABELLED: The effectiveness of exercise training in people with COPD is well established. However, alternative methods of training such as Tai Chi have not been widely evaluated. This paper describes the study design of a clinical trial which aims to determine if short form Sun-style Tai Chi improves exercise capacity and quality of life in people with COPD. METHOD: This randomised controlled trial will be conducted with concealed allocation and blinded outcome assessment. Participants will be recruited from Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney. After baseline measurement, participants will be randomised into either a Tai Chi Group or a Control Group. Participants in the Tai Chi Group will undergo supervised training twice weekly for twelve weeks. Participants in the Control Group will undergo usual medical care. Measurements will be taken at baseline (week 0) and after the study period (week 12). The primary outcome measurement is endurance walking capacity assessed by the endurance shuttle walk test. Secondary outcomes include measures related to peak walking capacity, physical performance, balance, muscle strength and quality of life. Details of the physiological responses during Tai Chi will be collected in a small cohort to determine the training intensity of Sun-style Tai Chi. DISCUSSION: If short form Sun-style Tai Chi improves exercise capacity, physical performance and quality of life in people with COPD, this would provide an alternate form of exercise training which does not require exercise equipment thus making effective exercise training more accessible for the large numbers of people with COPD.

Maintaining benefits following pulmonary rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to determine if weekly, supervised, outpatient-based exercise plus unsupervised home exercise following an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation programme would maintain functional exercise capacity and quality of life at 12 months better than standard care of unsupervised home exercise training. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects completed an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation programme, were randomised to an intervention group (IG) of weekly, supervised, exercise plus home exercise or to a control group (CG) of unsupervised home exercise and followed for 12 months. Outcome measurements at baseline (after pulmonary rehabilitation), and 3, 6 and 12 months included the 6-min walk test and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). 59 subjects with moderate COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II) were recruited and 48 subjects completed the study. 12-month mean difference showed no significant change from baseline in 6-min walk distance (IG -11 m, 95% CI -21-10 m; CG -6 m, 95% CI -34-11 m) or total SGRQ score (IG 3, 95% CI -0.8-7; CG -3, 95% CI -7-3). 12 months following pulmonary rehabilitation both weekly, supervised, outpatient-based exercise plus unsupervised home exercise and standard care of unsupervised home exercise successfully maintained 6-min walk distance and quality of life in subjects with moderate COPD.

Six-minute walk test as an outcome measure: are two six-minute walk tests necessary immediately after pulmonary rehabilitation and at three-month follow-up?

A 3-mo prospective, longitudinal, repeated-measures study was undertaken in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study aimed to determine whether there was a difference in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) when two 6-min walk tests were performed after pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 44) and at 3-mo follow-up (n = 40), and whether the results reflected the program outcomes. There was a significant increase in 6MWD between two 6-min walk tests before rehabilitation (P < 0.001), and at 3-mo follow-up (P < 0.001), but not immediately after rehabilitation (P = 0.1). In terms of program outcomes, there was an increase in 6MWD from before to after pulmonary rehabilitation (P < 0.001); however, the increase was greater if the better of two tests was reported. Six-minute walk tests performed twice before and after pulmonary rehabilitation programs and at 3-mo follow-up assessments ensure accuracy of measurement of the 6MWD and program outcomes.

Supported and unsupported arm exercise capacity following lung volume reduction surgery: a pilot study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been shown to improve lung function, leg exercise capacity and quality of life in subjects with severe COPD. This is the first study to examine the effect of LVRS on supported and unsupported arm exercise capacity. DESIGN: Eight subjects with COPD (% pred FEV1 +/- SD = 31.1 +/- 9.8%) completed testing. At baseline (T1), after eight weeks pulmonary rehabilitation (T2) and four months after LVRS (T3), each subject had tests of lung function, and performed three symptom-limited exercise tests to peak work capacity: supported arm exercise (SAE), unsupported arm exercise (UAE) and leg exercise (LE). MEASUREMENTS: The FEV1 (% pred) increased from 27.8 +/- 7.4 (mean +/- SD) at T2 to 36.3 +/- 7.1 at T3 (P < 0.05). Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) remained similar from T1 to T2 for SAE, UAE and LE (all P = 1.0) but increased from T2 to T3 (P < 0.05) (SAE: T2 = 0.59 +/- 0.2 L/min, T3 = 0.72 +/- 0.1 L/min; UAE: T2 = 0.45 +/- 0.1 L/min, T3 = 0.54 +/- 0.1 L/min; LE: T2 = 0.68 +/- 0.2 L/min, T3 = 0.81 +/- 0.2 L/min). The ratio of end-expiratory lung volume to total lung capacity was reduced at peak SAE and LE from T2 to T3 (P < 0.01) (SAE: T2 = 81 +/- 4.0%, T3 = 76 +/- 2.7%; LE: T2 = 81 +/- 5.1%, T3 = 75 +/- 3.6%). CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in SAE and UAE capacity following LVRS. Dynamic hyperinflation was reduced during SAE following LVRS.

Reduction in resting energy expenditure following lung volume reduction surgery in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Some subjects with COPD have an elevated resting energy expenditure (REE) which may be related to an increased work of breathing at rest. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on REE and body weight. DESIGN: Ten subjects with COPD were recruited (mean age +/- SD = 61.4 +/- 6.1 years). At baseline (which was following preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation) and four months following LVRS (combined with postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation), each subject had tests of lung function, REE via indirect calorimetry using a canopy system, six minute walk distance (6MWD) and quality of life (QoL) using the St George's Hospital Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). MEASUREMENTS: The FEV1 (% predicted) increased from 27.7 +/- 5.8% (mean +/- SD) at baseline to 33.9 +/- 7.8% following LVRS (P < 0.05). REE (% predicted) was 110 +/- 9.8% at baseline and decreased to 106 +/- 6.7% following LVRS (P = 0.04). Body mass index (BMI) following LVRS was unchanged (P = 0.67). No correlation between the change in BMI and change in REE was shown (r2 = 0.3, P = 0.1). There was a significant improvement in QoL following LVRS (P < 0.001). 6MWD also significantly increased from 354 +/- 83 m to 412 +/- 82 m following LVRS (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Whilst there was an increase in lung function and a reduction in REE following LVRS, there was no corresponding change to body weight. The improvement in REE following LVRS may be related to an improvement in work of breathing.