Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 146(7): 832-838, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29633685

RESUMO

Skilled nursing home facilities (SNFs) house a vulnerable population frequently exposed to respiratory pathogens. Our study aims to gain a better understanding of the transmission of nursing home-acquired viral respiratory infections in non-epidemic settings. Symptomatic surveillance was performed in three SNFs for residents exhibiting acute respiratory symptoms. Environmental surveillance of five high-touch areas was performed to assess possible transmission. All resident and environmental samples were screened using a commercial multiplex polymerase chain reaction platform. Bayesian methods were used to evaluate environmental contamination. Among nursing home residents with respiratory symptoms, 19% had a detectable viral pathogen (parainfluenza-3, rhinovirus/enterovirus, RSV, or influenza B). Environmental contamination was found in 20% of total room surface swabs of symptomatic residents. Environmental and resident results were all concordant. Target period prevalence among symptomatic residents ranged from 5.5 to 13.3% depending on target. Bayesian analysis quantifies the probability of environmental shedding due to parainfluenza-3 as 92.4% (95% CI: 86.8-95.8%) and due to rhinovirus/enterovirus as 65.6% (95% CI: 57.9-72.5%). Our findings confirm that non-epidemic viral infections are common among SNF residents exhibiting acute respiratory symptoms and that environmental contamination may facilitate further spread with considerable epidemiological implications. Findings further emphasise the importance of environmental infection control for viral respiratory pathogens in long-term care facilities.


Assuntos
Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Viroses/epidemiologia , Eliminação de Partículas Virais , Doença Aguda/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teorema de Bayes , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Casas de Saúde , Vigilância da População , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Viroses/virologia
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 145(12): 2575-2581, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28597809

RESUMO

Contact precautions are a traditional strategy to prevent transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Chlorhexidine bathing is increasingly used to decrease MRSA burden and transmission in intensive care units (ICUs). We sought to evaluate a hospital policy change from routine contact precautions for MRSA compared with universal chlorhexidine bathing, without contact precautions. We measured new MRSA acquisition in ICU patients and surveyed for MRSA environmental contamination in common areas and non-MRSA patient rooms before and after the policy change. During the baseline and chlorhexidine bathing periods, the number of patients (453 vs. 417), ICU days (1999 vs. 1703) and MRSA days/1000 ICU days (109 vs. 102) were similar. MRSA acquisition (2/453 vs. 2/457, P = 0·93) and environmental MRSA contamination (9/474 vs. 7/500, P = 0·53) were not significantly different between time periods. There were 58% fewer contact precaution days in the ICU during the chlorhexidine period (241/1993 vs. 102/1730, P < 0·01). We found no evidence that discontinuation of contact precautions for patients with MRSA in conjunction with adoption of daily chlorhexidine bathing in ICUs is associated with increased MRSA acquisition among ICU patients or increased MRSA contamination of ICU fomites. Although underpowered, our findings suggest this strategy, which has the potential to reduce costs and improve patient safety, should be assessed in similar but larger studies.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/farmacologia , California , Clorexidina/farmacologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos
3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 23(1): 48.e9-48.e16, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27642178

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considers carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) an urgent public health threat; however, its economic burden is unknown. METHODS: We developed a CRE clinical and economics outcomes model to determine the cost of CRE infection from the hospital, third-party payer, and societal, perspectives and to evaluate the health and economic burden of CRE to the USA. RESULTS: Depending on the infection type, the median cost of a single CRE infection can range from $22 484 to $66 031 for hospitals, $10 440 to $31 621 for third-party payers, and $37 778 to $83 512 for society. An infection incidence of 2.93 per 100 000 population in the USA (9418 infections) would cost hospitals $275 million (95% CR $217-334 million), third-party payers $147 million (95% CR $129-172 million), and society $553 million (95% CR $303-1593 million) with a 25% attributable mortality, and would result in the loss of 8841 (95% CR 5805-12 420) quality-adjusted life years. An incidence of 15 per 100 000 (48 213 infections) would cost hospitals $1.4 billion (95% CR $1.1-1.7 billion), third-party payers $0.8 billion (95% CR $0.6-0.8 billion), and society $2.8 billion (95% CR $1.6-8.2 billion), and result in the loss of 45 261 quality-adjusted life years. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of CRE is higher than the annual cost of many chronic diseases and of many acute diseases. Costs rise proportionally with the incidence of CRE, increasing by 2.0 times, 3.4 times, and 5.1 times for incidence rates of 6, 10, and 15 per 100 000 persons.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/economia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/terapia , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Simulação por Computador , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Método de Monte Carlo , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Epidemiol Infect ; 144(8): 1748-55, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27125574

RESUMO

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infections are a public health threat associated with increased patient mortality and healthcare costs. Antibiotic usage, particularly cephalosporins, has been associated with VRE colonization and VRE bloodstream infections (VRE BSI). We examined the relationship between antimicrobial usage and incident VRE colonization at the individual patient level. Prospective, weekly surveillance was undertaken for incident VRE colonization defined by negative admission but positive surveillance swab in a medical intensive care unit over a 17-month period. Antimicrobial exposure was quantified as days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyse incident VRE colonization and antibiotic DOT, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. Ninety-six percent (1398/1454) of admissions were swabbed within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) arrival and of the 380 patients in the ICU long enough for weekly surveillance, 83 (22%) developed incident VRE colonization. Incident colonization was associated in bivariate analysis with male gender, more previous hospital admissions, longer previous hospital stay, and use of cefepime/ceftazidime, fluconazole, azithromycin, and metronidazole (P < 0·05). After controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, metronidazole was the only antibiotic independently associated with incident VRE colonization (odds ratio 2·0, 95% confidence interval 1·2-3·3, P < 0·009). Our findings suggest that risk of incident VRE colonization differs between individual antibiotic agents and support the possibility that antimicrobial stewardship may impact VRE colonization and infection.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Uso de Medicamentos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
6.
Epidemiol Infect ; 141(10): 2140-8, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23217979

RESUMO

There are limited data examining whether outcomes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are worse when caused by community-associated (CA) strains compared to HA strains. We reviewed all patients' charts at our institution from 1999 to 2009 that had MRSA first isolated only after 72 h of hospitalization (n=724). Of these, 384 patients had a MRSA-HAI according to CDC criteria. Treatment failure was similar in those infected with a phenotypically CA-MRSA strain compared to a phenotypically HA-MRSA strain (23% vs. 15%, P=0.10) as was 30-day mortality (16% vs. 19%, P=0.57). Independent risk factors associated with (P<0.05) treatment failure were higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, higher APACHE II score, and no anti-MRSA treatment. These factors were also associated with 30-day mortality, as were female gender, older age, MRSA bloodstream infection, MRSA pneumonia, and HIV. Our findings suggest that clinical and host factors, not MRSA strain type, predict treatment failure and death in hospitalized patients with MRSA-HAIs.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Genótipo , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 14(5): 510-8, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22548840

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a life-threatening infection for immunocompromised individuals. Robust data and clear guidelines are available for prophylaxis and treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related PCP (HIV-PCP), yet few data and no guidelines are available for non-HIV-related PCP (NH-PCP). We postulated that prevention and inpatient management of HIV-PCP differed from NH-PCP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case review of all pathologically confirmed cases of PCP seen at the University of Alabama Medical Center from 1996 to 2008. Data on clinical presentation, hospital course, and outcome were collected using a standardized data collection instrument. Bivariate analysis compared prophylaxis, adjunctive corticosteroids, and clinical outcomes between patients with HIV-PCP and NH-PCP. RESULTS: Our analysis of the cohort included 97 cases of PCP; 65 HIV and 32 non-HIV cases. Non-HIV cases rarely received primary prophylaxis (4% vs. 38%, P = 0.01) and received appropriate antibiotics later in the course of hospitalization (5.2 days vs. 1.1 days, P < 0.005). Among transplant patients, NH-PCP was diagnosed a mean of 1066 days after transplantation and most patients were on low-dose corticosteroids (87%) at the time of disease onset. No significant differences in adjunctive corticosteroid use (69% vs. 77%, P = 0.39) and 90-day mortality (41% vs. 28%, P = 0.20) were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have undergone organ or stem cell transplant remain at risk for PCP for many years after transplantation. In our cohort, patients who developed NH-PCP were rarely given prophylaxis, and initiation of appropriate antibiotics was significantly delayed compared to cases of HIV-PCP. Medical providers should be aware of the ongoing risk for NH-PCP, even late after transplantation, and consider more aggressive approaches to both prophylaxis and earlier empirical therapy for PCP.


Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/mortalidade , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Hospitalização , Pneumocystis carinii , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/complicações , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/mortalidade , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/fisiopatologia , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/virologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Quimioprevenção , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1 , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/fisiopatologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/efeitos adversos
8.
Epidemiol Infect ; 139(9): 1342-50, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21073764

RESUMO

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bloodstream infections (VRE-BSI) are a growing problem with few clinical trials to guide therapy. We conducted a retrospective study of management and predictors of mortality for VRE-BSI at a tertiary-care centre from January 2005 to August 2008. Univariate and multivariable analyses examined the relationship of patient characteristics and antibiotic therapy with 30-day all-cause mortality. Rates of VRE-BSI increased from 0·06 to 0·17 infections/1000 patient-days (P=0·03). For 235 patients, 30-day mortality was 34·9%. Patients were primarily treated with linezolid (44·2%) or daptomycin (36·5%). Factors associated with mortality were haemodialysis [odds ratio (OR) 3·2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·6-6·3, P=0·007], mechanical ventilation (OR 3·7, 95% CI 1·3-10·4, P=0·01), and malnutrition (OR 2·0, 95% CI 1·0-4·0, P=0·046). Use of linezolid, but not daptomycin (P=0·052) showed a trend towards an association with survival. In conclusion, VRE-BSI is a growing problem, associated with significant 30-day mortality. Multiple factors were associated with poor outcomes at our hospital.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Enterococcus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Resistência a Vancomicina , Acetamidas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Daptomicina/uso terapêutico , Enterococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/mortalidade , Humanos , Linezolida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...