Impact of a design modification in modern firefighting uniforms on burn prevention outcomes in New York City firefighters.

Our aim was to determine the impact of three different firefighting uniforms (traditional, modern, and modified modern) on the incidence and severity of thermal burn injuries, the major occupational injury affecting firefighters. Injury data were collected prospectively for the entire New York City Fire Department (FDNY) firefighting force wearing FDNY's traditional uniform (protective over-coat) from May 1, 1993 to August 31, 1993; FDNY's modern uniform (protective over-coat and over-pant) from May 1, 1995 to August 31, 1995; and FDNY's modified modern uniform (short sleeved shirt and short pants, rather than long-sleeved shirt and long pants, worn under firefighter's protective over-clothes) from May 1, 1998 to August 31, 1998. Outcome measures were burn incidence and severity. Adverse outcomes were heat exhaustion and cardiac events. During this 12-month study, 29,094 structural fires occurred. The incidence rate for upper extremity burns was 2341 per 100,000 fires and for lower extremity burns, 2076 per 100,000 fires. With the change from the traditional to modern uniform, the distribution of burns per fire decreased significantly (P = 0.001) for upper extremity burns (86%) and lower extremity burns (93%). With the change from traditional to modern uniform, days lost to medical leave for upper or lower extremity burns decreased by 89%. The majority of burns occurred at the lower arm and mid-leg, and the change to the modern uniform decreased such burns by 87% and 92%. Burn incidence and severity were not significantly affected by the change to the modified modern uniform. The distribution of heat exhaustion or cardiac events per fire was not significantly affected by the change from the traditional to modern uniform, and heat exhaustion was decreased (P < 0.001) by the change to the modified modern uniform. In conclusion, the modern uniform dramatically reduced burn incidence and severity without adverse impact. The modified modern uniform significantly reduced heat exhaustion without significantly affecting thermal protection.

Impact of a modern firefighting protective uniform on the incidence and severity of burn injuries in New York City firefighters.

The New York City Fire Department (FDNY) is the largest fire department in the United States, with over 11,000 firefighters. In 1994, FDNY changed to a modern firefighting protective uniform. The major difference between traditional and modern uniforms is that modern uniforms include both protective over-coat and over-pant, whereas traditional uniforms include only the over-coat. Furthermore, modern uniforms are manufactured using improved thermal protective textiles that meet or exceed current National Fire Protection Association standards for structural firefighting. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the modern uniform on the incidence and severity of FDNY burn injuries. We also evaluated the incidence and severity of other non-burn injuries to determine whether there was serious adverse impact. The number of lower-extremity burns decreased by 85% when 2 years' experience while wearing the modern uniform was compared with 2 years while wearing the traditional uniform. Upper-extremity burns and head burns decreased by 65% and 40%, respectively. Severity indicators (days lost to medical leave, hospital admissions, and skin grafts) for lower- and upper-extremity burn injuries were all substantially reduced. This occurred without significant change in the incidence or severity of trunk burns, heat exhaustion, inhalation injuries (actually decreased), or cardiac events. The reduction in the incidence and severity of burn injuries, the major occupational injury affecting this workforce, has been so dramatic and without untoward effects that the introduction of the modern uniform must be characterized as a sentinel event in the history of firefighter health and safety.

Fetal fibronectin as a marker to discriminate between ectopic and intrauterine pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of fetal fibronectin values for diagnosing ectopic pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We obtained vaginal swabs from women with pregnancies of < or = 12 weeks' gestation to perform enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for fetal fibronectin. Fetal fibronectin values were compared among groups categorized on the basis of clinical and laboratory criteria into (1) ectopic pregnancies, (2) threatened abortions, (3) incomplete/complete abortions, and (4) uncomplicated intrauterine pregnancies. RESULTS: Mean fetal fibronectin values ranged from 0.08 microg/mL in women with ectopic pregnancies to 0.33 microg/mL in women with threatened abortions. Comparing these two diagnostic categories, a negative fetal fibronectin test (at a cutoff level of 0.300 microg/mL) predicted ectopic pregnancy with a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 28%, positive predictive value of 62%, and negative predictive value of 78%. CONCLUSION: Although fetal fibronectin is low in women with ectopic pregnancies, a negative test is not sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used clinically for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.