Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 36
Filtrar
1.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 40(4): 264-73, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22527709

RESUMO

To examine if an innovative collaborative care model known as Targeted Child Psychiatric Services designed for primary care pediatricians (PCPs) and child psychiatrists (1) was associated with improved access to child psychiatry services, (2) had the potential to identify optimal care settings for pediatric mental health care and (3) examined if pediatricians appeared as likely to accept children back into their practices at discharge from TCPS depending upon diagnostic category, controlling for severity of illness and function. The diagnostic classes examined were ADHD (39%), depression (31%) and anxiety (13%). This prospective cohort design study collected medical records of 329 children referred to TCPS by 139 PCPs. To detect the likelihood of return to referring pediatricians for follow-up care at discharge from TCPS, we employed logistic regression models. Mean age was 12.3 (SD = 4.0); 43% were female. Ninety-three percent of parents complied with pediatricians' recommendations to have their child assessed by a child psychiatrist. A total of 28.0% of referrals returned to PCPs for follow-up care; the remainder were followed in mental health. Regression findings indicated that children with major depression (OR = 7.5) or anxiety disorders (OR = 5.1) were less likely to return to PCPs compared to ADHD even though severity of psychiatric illness and functional levels did not differ across diagnostic groups. Families widely accepted pediatricians' recommendations for referral to child psychiatrists. Depression and anxiety were strong correlates of retention in mental health settings at discharge from TCPS though children with these disorders appeared to be no more severely ill or functionally limited than peers with ADHD. These children possibly could be managed in a less intensive and expensive primary care treatment setting that could access mental health specialty services as needed in a collaborative model of care. TCPS is contrasted with the well-known collaborative model for adult depression in primary care. TCPS could serve as a feasible model of care that addresses the daunting barriers in accessing pediatric mental health services.


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pediatria , Adolescente , Lista de Checagem , Criança , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/instrumentação , Massachusetts , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
J Thromb Haemost ; 5(1): 75-81, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17002661

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is a widely used antithrombotic agent that inhibits the platelet P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor. There is increasing interest in 'clopidogrel resistance'. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether 'clopidogrel resistance' is accounted for by a pre-existent variability in platelet response to ADP. METHODS: Platelet response to 20 microm ADP was analyzed by four independent whole blood flow cytometric assays: platelet surface activated GPIIb-IIIa, platelet surface P-selectin, monocyte-platelet aggregates and neutrophil-platelet aggregates. In 25 consecutive, non-aspirin-treated healthy subjects, we studied platelet response before and after clopidogrel administration. In addition, we studied the platelet response in 613 consecutive aspirinated patients with or without coronary artery disease (CAD, as determined by angiography) who had or had not been treated with clopidogrel. In these patients, we tested for homogeneity of variance across all durations of clopidogrel exposure and severity of CAD by estimating the 'goodness of fit' of two independent models. RESULTS: In the healthy subjects, pre-clopidogrel response to ADP predicted post-clopidogrel response to ADP. In the patients, clopidogrel, as expected, inhibited the platelet response to ADP. However, irrespective of the duration of clopidogrel administration, the severity of CAD, and the dose of aspirin, clopidogrel did not increase the variance in the platelet response to ADP in any of the four assays of platelet response. CONCLUSIONS: These studies provide evidence that 'clopidogrel resistance' is accounted for by a pre-existent variability in platelet response to ADP and this variability is not increased by clopidogrel administration.


Assuntos
Difosfato de Adenosina/farmacologia , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Resistência a Medicamentos , Ativação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/farmacologia , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Aspirina/farmacologia , Teorema de Bayes , Clopidogrel , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/fisiopatologia , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Testes de Função Plaquetária , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Valores de Referência , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Ticlopidina/administração & dosagem , Ticlopidina/farmacologia , Fatores de Tempo
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 49(6): 793-7, 2001 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11454120

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify specific characteristics of patients, physicians, and treatment settings associated with decreased receipt of essential medications in a chronically ill, older population following a Medicaid three-prescription monthly reimbursement limit (cap). DESIGN: Quasi-experiment with bivariate and multivariate regression. SETTING: Patients in the New Hampshire Medicaid program and their regular prescribing physicians. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and forty-three chronically ill Medicaid enrollees with regular use of essential medications for heart disease, asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, seizure, or coagulation disorders who received an average of three or more prescriptions per month during the baseline year. MEASUREMENTS: Postcap patient-level change in standard monthly dose of essential medications compared with the baseline period, presence of 11 comorbidities (defined by regular use of specific indicator drugs), practice setting, and location of regular prescribing physician. RESULTS: The mean percentage change in standard doses of essential medications following the cap was -34.4%. Larger changes were significantly associated with several baseline measures: greater numbers of precap medications, greater numbers of comorbidities, longer hospitalizations, and greater use of ambulatory services. The three comorbidities associated with the largest relative reduction in essential drug use were psychoses/bipolar disorders, anxiety/sleep problems, and chronic pain. Patients of physicians in group practices, clinics, or hospitals tended to have smaller dose reductions than those whose physicians were in solo or small-group practice. CONCLUSIONS: Patients most at risk of reduced access to essential medications because of a reimbursement cap include those with multiple chronic illnesses requiring drug therapy, especially illnesses with a mental health component. Physicians in clinics or large group practices may have maintained patient medication regimens more effectively.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos Essenciais/economia , Medicamentos Essenciais/uso terapêutico , Idoso Fragilizado , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Controle de Custos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , New Hampshire/epidemiologia , Dor/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/legislação & jurisprudência , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Análise de Regressão , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 16(6): 351-9, 2001 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11422631

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Recent reports have linked calcium channel blockers (CCBs) with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to determine to what extent physicians relinquished CCBs following these adverse reports and if there were differences in the use of CCBs and other AMI therapies across 3 levels of specialist involvement: generalist attendings, collaborative care (generalist with cardiologist consultation), and cardiologist attendings. DESIGN: We measured use of CCBs during hospitalization for AMI before (1992--1993) and after (1995--1996) the adverse CCB reports, controlling for hospital-, physician-, and patient-level variables. We also examined use of effective medications (aspirin, beta-blockers, thrombolytic therapy) and ineffective AMI treatments (lidocaine). SETTING: Thirty-seven community-based hospitals in Minnesota. PATIENTS: Population-based sample of 5,347 patients admitted with AMI. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was prescription of a CCB at the time of discharge from hospital. Secondary outcomes included use of other effective and ineffective AMI therapies during hospitalization and at discharge. MAIN RESULTS: Compared with cardiologists, generalist attendings were less likely to use aspirin (37% vs 68%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.42 to 0.80) and thrombolytics (29% vs 64%; adjusted OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.25), but not beta-blockers (20% vs 46%; adjusted OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.31). From 1992--1993 to 1995--1996, the use of CCBs in patients with AMI decreased from 24% to 10%, the net result of physicians starting CCBs less often and discontinuing them more often. In multivariate models, the odds of CCB relinquishment after the adverse reports (adjusted OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.39) were independent of, and not modified by, the involvement of a cardiologist. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with cardiologists, generalist physicians were less likely to adopt some effective AMI therapies, particularly those associated with risk such as thrombolytic therapy. However, generalists were as likely as cardiologists to relinquish CCBs after the adverse reports. This pattern of practice may be the generalist physicians' response to an expanding, but increasingly risky and uncertain, pharmacopoeia.


Assuntos
Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/efeitos adversos , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Especialização , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Terapia Trombolítica , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Health Care Financ Rev ; 21(3): 185-201, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11481755

RESUMO

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) expansions for disabled children in the early 1990s provoked criticism that eligibility criteria were too lax and motivated the subsequent retraction of benefits for many children. However, little evidence exists on whether the clinical needs of SSI children declined during this period. The authors used Medicaid data to examine changes in average expenditures between 1989 and 1992, using an Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) comparison group to control for confounding time trends (e.g., in access). Results showed declines in average expenditures in Georgia and Tennessee but increases in California and Michigan, which are thought to have started with more liberal eligibility policies.


Assuntos
Crianças com Deficiência/classificação , Definição da Elegibilidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza , Previdência Social/legislação & jurisprudência , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estados Unidos
7.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 47(10): 1222-8, 1999 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10522956

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine demographic and clinical factors associated with delayed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort. SETTING: 37 Minnesota hospitals during the time periods October 1992-July 1993 and July 1995-April 1996. PATIENTS: We reviewed the medical records of 776 older patients aged 65 or older hospitalized with an admission diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, suspected acute myocardial infarction, or rule-out acute myocardial infarction, who were treated with a thrombolytic agent. MEASUREMENT: We used multivariate logistic regression models to examine the association between selected study characteristics and time between hospital presentation and administration of thrombolytic treatment. Early thrombolysis was defined as less than 60 minutes after hospital presentation and late thrombolysis as 60+ minutes. RESULTS: Of 776 study patients, 57.5% (n = 446) received early thrombolysis. Of the remaining 330 patients receiving late treatment, 12.1% (n = 94) were thrombolyzed more than 2 hours after hospital presentation. After controlling for other factors, the odds of delayed thrombolysis among patients aged 75 or older were 1.48 compared with younger individuals (95% CI, 1.17-1.88). The odds of delayed thrombolysis among patients with severe comorbidity were 1.46 (95% CI, 1.10-1.94) compared with individuals without severe comorbidity. Predictors of early thrombolytic treatment included hospital arrival via emergency transport (ORdelay = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34-0.63) and chest discomfort at admission (ORdelay = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that patients of advanced age and with severe comorbidity are more likely to experience delayed thrombolytic treatment after hospital presentation. These are the patients who suffer the highest morbidity from acute myocardial infarction and for whom expeditious treatment may enhance therapeutic benefit.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
8.
Arch Intern Med ; 159(17): 2013-20, 1999 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10510986

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A commonly voiced concern is that health maintenance organizations (HMOs) may withhold or delay the provision of urgent, essential care, especially for vulnerable patients like the elderly. OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of emergency care provided in Minnesota to elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are covered by HMO vs fee-for-service (FFS) insurance. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 2304 elderly Medicare patients who were admitted with AMI to 20 urban community hospitals in Minnesota (representing 91% of beds in areas served by HMOs) from October 1992 through July 1993 and from July 1995 through April 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of emergency transportation and treatment delay (>6 hours from symptom onset); time to electrocardiogram; use of aspirin, thrombolytics, and beta-blockers among eligible patients; and time from hospital arrival to thrombolytic administration (door-to-needle time). RESULTS: Demographic characteristics, severity of symptoms, and comorbidity characteristics were almost identical among HMO (n = 612) and FFS (n = 1692) patients. A cardiologist was involved as a consultant or the attending physician in the care of 80% of HMO patients and 82% of FFS patients (P = .12). The treatment delay, time to electrocardiogram, use of thrombolytic agents, and door-to-needle times were almost identical. However, 56% of HMO patients and 51% of FFS patients used emergency transportation (P = .02); most of this difference was observed for patients with AMIs that occurred at night (60% vs 52%; P = .02). Health maintenance organization patients were somewhat more likely than FFS patients to receive aspirin therapy (88% vs 83%; P = .03) and beta-blocker therapy (73% vs 62%; P = .04); these differences were partly explained by a significantly larger proportion of younger physicians in HMOs who were more likely to order these drug therapies. All differences were consistent across the 3 largest HMOs (1 staff-group model and 2 network model HMOs). Logistic regression analyses controlling for demographic and clinical variables produced similar results, except that the differences in the use of beta-blockers became insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: No indicators of timeliness and quality of care for elderly patients with AMIs were lower under HMO vs FFS insurance coverage in Minnesota. However, two indicators of quality care were slightly but significantly higher in the HMO setting (use of emergency transportation and aspirin therapy). Further research is needed in other states, in different populations, and for different medical conditions.


Assuntos
Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/normas , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/normas , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Eletrocardiografia , Tratamento de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Medicare , Minnesota , Transferência de Pacientes , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
9.
Bull World Health Organ ; 77(8): 675-80, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10516789

RESUMO

This paper assesses the relevance and time-to-expiry of pharmaceutical donations by the USA by means of a convenience sample of two private voluntary organizations. Data were collected on 16,566 donations shipped between 1994 and 1997 for the two organizations to a total of 129 countries. For three field study countries (Armenia, Haiti, and the United Republic of Tanzania), between 37% and 65% of donated unique drug products were on the recipient countries' essential drugs lists, and between 50% and 80% were either on these lists or were permissible therapeutic alternatives. Between 10% and 42% were not listed on either the national essential drugs lists or the WHO Model List of Essential Drugs, nor were they permissible therapeutic alternatives. For the worldwide data set, the median times to expiry when shipment by the organizations took place were 599 and 550 days; about 30% of shipment items had a year or less of shelf-life, and about 6% had less than 100 days of shelf-life. Although a majority of the donations fulfilled the criteria of relevance and time-to-expiry, a substantial proportion failed to do so. Actions are proposed with a view to improving the relevance and time-to-expiry of USA pharmaceutical donations.


Assuntos
Rotulagem de Medicamentos , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Cooperação Internacional , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Socorro em Desastres , Estados Unidos
10.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 11(4): 293-300, 1999 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10501599

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between having a primary source of ambulatory care (PSAC), access to AIDS treatment and prophylaxis for opportunistic infection, and hospital and mortality outcomes among heterosexual men and women with AIDS. METHODS: Using a linked AIDS Registry-Medicaid database, 366 adults were identified (1989-1991) with at least 1 year of continuous Medicaid enrollment before AIDS diagnosis, who survived 2 weeks after diagnosis, and with no antiretroviral use or Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis during the pre-diagnosis year. Outcomes included times to zidovudine treatment, PCP prophylaxis, hospitalization and death following diagnosis. Multivariate proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effects of patients' PSAC status in the 12-month post-diagnosis period on outcomes, controlling for demographic and case-mix variables. RESULTS: Study criteria preferentially included females, non-whites and enrollees eligible on the basis of aid to families with dependent children. A total of 49% of the patients had no PSAC. Patients with a PSAC were more likely to have received zidovudine [relative risk (RR) = 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2, 2.2] or PCP prophylaxis (RR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.5, 3.3). Regression models simultaneously examining association of the propensity to use zidovudine and PCP prophylaxis agents with death indicated that zidovudine-treated and PCP-prophylaxed patients were 64% and 51% less likely to die, respectively (RRdeath,zidovudine = (.36, 95% CI = 0.2, 0.4; RRdeath, PCP prophylaxis = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.3, 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' underuse of zidovudine and PCP prophylaxis was systematically associated with not having a PSAC. Lack of PSAC, in turn, predicted shorter survival but not increased hospitalization. Female gender, injecting drug use, non-white race and earlier diagnosis year also predicted poorer outcomes.


Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/mortalidade , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/mortalidade , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Ambulatório Hospitalar , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/prevenção & controle , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Fatores Sexuais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Análise de Sobrevida
11.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 47(5): 512-7, 1999 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10323641

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have highlighted the potentially harmful effects of short-acting calcium channel blockers, especially of the dihydropyridine type, in patients with coronary heart disease. Some have argued that long-acting calcium channel blockers are safer, but few outcome data exist. The objective of the study was to compare the occurrence of adverse outcomes among recipients of long-acting versus short-acting calcium channel blockers, with dihydropyridines and non-dihydropyridines compared separately. SETTING: The New Jersey Medicare population. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using linked Medicare and drug claims data. PARTICIPANTS: Older survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI) occurring in 1989 and 1990. Eligible subjects had survived at least 30 days after the MI, participated in Medicare and a drug benefits program, and were prescribed a single type of either a long-acting or a short-acting calcium channel blocker within 90 days after the MI. MEASUREMENTS: The two outcome measures were rates of all-cause mortality and cardiac rehospitalization. Using separate Cox regression models for dihydropyridines (nifedipine, nicardipine) and non-dihydropyridines (diltiazem, verapamil), we examined these outcomes for recipients of long-acting compared with short-acting calcium channel blockers. RESULTS: Of the 833 patients eligible for the study, 160 were prescribed long-acting and 673 short-acting calcium channel blockers. Clinical characteristics of long-acting and short-acting users were comparable. During 2 years of follow-up, 221 deaths and 300 rehospitalizations occurred. Controlling for age, sex, race, and indicators of disease severity and comorbidity, the relative risk of dying for recipients of long-acting, compared with short-acting, dihydropyridines was .42 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.86). For cardiac rehospitalization, the relative risk was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.94). For the long-acting versus short-acting nondihydropyridines, the adjusted relative risk of dying was 1.43 (95% CI, 0.88-2.32), and for cardiac rehospitalization, .65 (95% CI, 0.40-1.05). CONCLUSION: Use of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers after acute MI was associated with substantially lower rates of cardiac rehospitalization and death compared with use of their short-acting counterparts. More data are needed to address the possibility that long-acting, compared with short-acting, non-dihydropyridines could decrease rehospitalization rates but increase mortality.


Assuntos
Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/efeitos adversos , Di-Hidropiridinas/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Di-Hidropiridinas/uso terapêutico , Diltiazem/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nicardipino/efeitos adversos , Nifedipino/efeitos adversos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Sobreviventes , Verapamil/efeitos adversos
12.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 153(1): 80-4, 1999 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9895004

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative growth of types of chronic health conditions among children and adolescents receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits before and after major SSI program changes, including changes in definitions of childhood disability and outreach to identify eligible children. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Medicaid claims from California, Georgia, Michigan, and Tennessee. PARTICIPANTS: All children (aged < or = 21 years) newly enrolled in SSI programs in these states from July 1989 (n=21 222) to June 1992 (n=38 789). METHODS: Medicaid data indicate eligibility status and diagnoses for services rendered. For children newly enrolled before (time 1, July 1989 to June 1990), during (time 2, July 1990 to June 1991), and after (time 3, July 1991 to June 1992) the program changes, we used claims for the first 6 months of enrollment to determine rates of chronic conditions in general and rates of asthma, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and mental retardation specifically. We also followed up time 1 enrollees during the study period to determine the likelihood of a chronic condition claim at any time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Presence of claims for chronic conditions. RESULTS: New SSI enrollees almost doubled during the study period. Increasing numbers of new enrollees had chronic condition claims in their first 6 months (from 29% to 36%); 58% of time 1 enrollees had such claims during any study month. Rates of chronic physical conditions other than asthma increased 14% (time 1 to time 3); asthma rates increased 73%. Rates of mental health conditions other than mental retardation and ADHD increased 63%; rates of mental retardation decreased 29%, while rates of ADHD increased almost 3-fold. CONCLUSIONS: The number of children with chronic conditions receiving SSI benefits experienced rapid growth from 1989 to 1992. Growth was particularly marked for children with diagnoses of asthma and ADHD.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/economia , Crianças com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Previdência Social/economia , Adolescente , Asma/economia , Asma/epidemiologia , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/economia , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Georgia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Deficiência Intelectual/economia , Deficiência Intelectual/epidemiologia , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Previdência Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Tennessee/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos
14.
Arch Intern Med ; 158(16): 1778-83, 1998 Sep 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9738607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion of managed care in the United States has increased debate regarding the appropriate mix of generalist and specialist involvement in medical care. OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of medical care when generalists and cardiologists work separately or together in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 1716 patients with AMI treated at 22 Minnesota hospitals between 1992 and 1993. Patients eligible for thrombolytic aspirin, beta-blockers, and lidocaine therapy were identified using criteria from the 1991 American College of Cardiology guidelines for the management of AMI. We compared the use of these drugs among eligible patients whose attending physician was a generalist with no cardiologist input, a generalist with a cardiologist consultation, and a cardiologist alone. RESULTS: Patients cared for by a cardiologist alone were younger, presented earlier to the hospital, were more likely to be male, had less severe comorbidity, and were more likely to have an ST elevation of 1 mm or more than generalists' patients. Controlling for these differences, there was no variation in the use of effective agents between patients cared for by a cardiologist attending physician and a generalist with a consultation by a cardiologist. However, there was a consistent trend toward increased use of aspirin, thrombolytics, and beta-blockers in these patients compared with those with a generalist attending physician only (P<.05 for beta-blockers only). Differences between groups in the use of lidocaine were not statistically significant. The adjusted probabilities of use of thrombolytics for consultative care and cardiologist attending physicians were 0.73 for both. Corresponding probabilities were 0.86 and 0.85 for aspirin and 0.59 and 0.57 for beta-blockers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with AMI, consultation between generalists and specialists may improve the quality of care. Recent policy debates that have focused solely on access to specialists have ignored the important issue of coordination of care between generalist and specialist physicians. In hospitals where cardiology services are available, generalists may be caring for patients with AMI who are older and more frail. Future research and policy analyses should examine whether this pattern of selective referral is true for other medical conditions.


Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Medicina Interna , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Razão de Chances , Seleção de Pacientes , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
Pediatrics ; 102(3 Pt 1): 610-5, 1998 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9738184

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical characteristics and health service use of children with high Medicaid expenditures. METHODOLOGY: We examined 1992 Medicaid claims and eligibility files from four states (California, Georgia, Michigan, Tennessee) for children with at least $10000 billed to Medicaid who obtained Medicaid through the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Program and a comparison group (matched by age group and gender) of children receiving Medicaid for other reasons. We compared mean expenditures, examined expenses by category, and examined diagnoses associated with at least $10000 in expenses. RESULTS: In 1992, Medicaid paid on average approximately $1000 for children with non-SSI Medicaid enrollment. Expenditures for children with SSI were 2.9 to 9.4 times higher, but once the approximately 10% of children with high expenditures were excluded, SSI average expenditures were only 1.5 to 2.7 times higher than the non-SSI average. Children with high expenditures are likely to use hospitals and long-term care, and these services account for more than half of the average expenditures. Children with high expenditures and SSI are more likely to have chronic medical conditions than are their peers enrolled in Medicaid but not through SSI. CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of children, even on SSI, account for very large proportions of Medicaid expenditures. Most children with SSI, despite having relatively severe mental health, physical, or developmental disabilities, have relatively modest Medicaid expenditures.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Previdência Social/economia , Criança , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Previdência Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
16.
Am J Public Health ; 88(6): 928-31, 1998 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9618622

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of poverty, program generosity, and health on state variations in enrollment of children and adolescents in the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program during recent program expansions. METHODS: The relationship of state SSI rates for 1989 and 1992 to child poverty, health, and program generosity were determined by multiple regression. RESULTS: The mean percentage of children enrolled grew from 0.36% (1989) to 0.75% (1992). Poverty rates accounted for 78% of the variance among states in 1989 and 53% in 1992. Other indicators accounted for little variance. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in state poverty levels explained almost all variation in SSI enrollment.


Assuntos
Previdência Social/estatística & dados numéricos , Planos Governamentais de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Definição da Elegibilidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Benefícios do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
17.
JAMA ; 279(17): 1358-63, 1998 May 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9582043

RESUMO

CONTEXT: The effectiveness of recruiting local medical opinion leaders to improve quality of care is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a guideline-implementation intervention of clinician education by local opinion leaders and performance feedback to (1) increase use of lifesaving drugs (aspirin and thrombolytics in eligible elderly patients, beta-blockers in all eligible patients) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and (2) decrease use of a potentially harmful therapy (prophylactic lidocaine). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with hospital as the unit of randomization, intervention, and analysis. SETTING: Thirty-seven community hospitals in Minnesota. PATIENTS: All patients with AMI admitted to study hospitals over 10 months before (1992-1993, N=2409) or after (1995-1996, N=2938) the intervention. INTERVENTION: Using a validated survey, we identified opinion leaders at 20 experimental hospitals who influenced peers through small and large group discussions, informal consultations, and revisions of protocols and clinical pathways. They focused on (1) evidence (drug efficacy), (2) comparative performance, and (3) barriers to change. Control hospitals received mailed performance feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital-specific changes before and after the intervention in the proportion of eligible patients receiving each study drug. RESULTS: Among experimental hospitals, the median change in the proportion of eligible elderly patients receiving aspirin was +0.13 (17% increase from 0.77 at baseline), compared with a change of -0.03 at control hospitals (P=.04). For beta-blockers, the respective changes were +0.31 (63% increase from 0.49 at baseline) vs +0.18 (30% increase from baseline) for controls (P=.02). Lidocaine use declined by about 50% in both groups. The intervention did not increase thrombolysis in the elderly (from 0.73 at baseline), but nearly two thirds of eligible nonrecipients were older than 85 years, had severe comorbidities, or presented after at least 6 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Working with opinion leaders and providing performance feedback can accelerate adoption of some beneficial AMI therapies (eg, aspirin, beta-blockers). Secular changes in knowledge and hospital protocols may extinguish outdated practices (eg, prophylactic lidocaine). However, it is more difficult to increase use of effective but riskier treatments (eg, thrombolysis) for frail elderly patients.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/normas , Cardiologia/normas , Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Cardiologia/tendências , Procedimentos Clínicos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Hospitais Comunitários/normas , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Minnesota , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Terapia Trombolítica
18.
Ann Intern Med ; 126(8): 593-9, 1997 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9103125

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In patients who have had acute myocardial infarction, the delay between the onset of symptoms and hospital presentation is a critical factor in determining the initial management strategy and outcomes of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine the determinants of delayed hospital presentation in patients who have had acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: 37 hospitals in Minnesota. PATIENTS: 2409 persons hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction between October 1992 and July 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Hospital presentation delayed more than 6 hours after the onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Information on length of delay was available for 2404 patients. Of these patients, 969 (40%) delayed presentation to the hospital for more than 6 hours after the onset of symptoms. Factors associated with prolonged delay included advanced age and female sex. The presence of chest discomfort and a history of mechanical revascularization significantly reduced the risk for prolonged delay. Risk for delay was greatest during the evening and early morning hours (6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.) Patients with a history of hypertension were more likely to delay presentation. Only 42% of all patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction had used emergency medical transport services. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have had acute myocardial infarction often delay hospital presentation. Educational interventions that encourage the prompt use of emergency medical transport services and target specific patient populations, such as elderly persons, women, and persons with cardiac risk factors, may be most successful in reducing the length of delay and improving the outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
J Gen Intern Med ; 12(1): 1-6, 1997 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9034940

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Growing evidence indicates that life-sustaining therapies for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are underused among patients eligible for therapy, including the elderly and women. We examined the effect of a patient's comorbidity burden on use of these highly effective therapies in eligible populations of individuals with AMI. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort design. SETTING AND PATIENTS: We reviewed the medical records of 2,409 individuals at 37 Minnesota hospitals from October 1992 through July 1993 with an admission diagnosis of AMI, suspected AMI, or rule-out AMI, who met electrocardiographic, laboratory, and clinical criteria for AMI. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using multivariate logistic regression models, we determined the association between a validated comorbidity measure and the proportion of eligible patients who received thrombolysis or aspirin. Controlling for other factors previously reported to influence rates of study treatment, the odds of receipt of thrombolysis among patients with severe comorbidity was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27, 0.88) when compared with individuals without such limitation. Similarly, the odds of aspirin treatment among study patients with severe comorbidity was 0.46 (95% CI 0.30 0.72), compared with individuals without severe comorbidity. We did not distinguish any differences in patterns of treatment with either study treatment among patients with mild or moderate comorbidity when compared with individuals without any concomitant comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that patients with severe mental and physical comorbidities are less likely to receive standard therapies for AMI recommended in national treatment guidelines.


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Terapia Trombolítica , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Intervalos de Confiança , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Seleção de Pacientes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
JAMA ; 277(2): 115-21, 1997 Jan 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8990335

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To study determinants and adverse outcomes (mortality and rehospitalization) of beta-blocker underuse in elderly patients with myocardial infarction; and whether the relative risks (RRs) of survival associated with beta-blocker use were comparable to those reported in the large randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: New Jersey Medicare population. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort design using linked Medicare and drug claims data from 1987 to 1992. PATIENTS: Statewide cohort of 5332 elderly 30-day acute myocardial infarction (AMI) survivors with prescription drug coverage, of whom 3737 were eligible for beta-blockers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: beta-Blocker and calcium channel blocker use in the first 90 days after discharge and mortality rates and cardiac hospital readmissions over the 2-year period after discharge, controlling for sociodemographic and baseline risk variables. RESULTS: Only 21% of eligible patients received beta-blocker therapy; this rate remained unchanged from 1987 to 1991. Patients were almost 3 times more likely to receive a new prescription for a calcium channel blocker than for a new beta-blocker after their AMIs. Advanced age and calcium channel blocker use predicted underuse of beta-blockers. Controlling for other predictors of survival, the mortality rate among beta-blocker recipients was 43% less than that for nonrecipients (RR=0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.69). Effects on mortality were substantial in all age strata (65-74 years, 75-84 years, and > or = 85 years) and consistent with the results for elderly subgroups of 2 large RCTs. beta-Blocker recipients were rehospitalized 22% less often than nonrecipients (RR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90). Use of a calcium channel blocker instead of a beta-blocker was associated with a doubled risk of death (RR= 1.98; 95% CI, 1.44-2.72), not because calcium channel blockers had a demonstrable adverse effect, but because they were substitutes for beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: beta-Blockers are underused in elderly AMI survivors, leading to measurable adverse outcomes. These data suggest that the survival benefits of beta-blockade after an AMI may extend to eligible patients older than 75 years, a group that has been excluded from RCTs.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Sobreviventes , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...