An assessment of nurses' perceived and actual household emergency preparedness.

Nurses' household preparedness is critical if they are to avoid role conflict and report for duty during an emergency. To date, the alignment between nurses' perceived and actual household preparedness remains under examined. Investigating one of these variables in isolation fails to consider that perceived and actual household preparedness must be high and aligned. If misaligned, vulnerabilities could surface during emergencies, like concerns about family safety, potentially impacting a nurse's commitment to duty during a crisis, or nurses may lack the actual preparedness to continue working long hours during an emergency. An online questionnaire was distributed to registered nurses in Ireland. The questionnaire was informed by a review of the literature and captured nurses' perceived and actual household preparedness, attitudes towards and exposure to a range of emergencies, and pertinent demographic characteristics. The results showed a relationship between how nurses view their household preparedness and their actual preparedness. Regression analyses indicate that while there is an overlap, the factors associated with how prepared nurses think they are and how prepared they are can differ. This means that strategies to boost actual preparedness may differ from those needed to boost perceived preparedness. This finding underscores the importance of psychosocial preparedness. Feeling prepared is crucial as it can influence how one responds in an emergency. Considering both the perceived and actual aspects of household preparedness can lead to a more effective response during emergencies.

Preparing to respond: Irish nurses' perceptions of preparedness for an influenza pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this research was to garner opinion on: the concerns of nurses in respect of the key issues that they may face in the event of an influenza pandemic; the perceived impact of an influenza pandemic on these nurses; and the current level of perceived preparedness in their hospital. Of particular significance is the fact that data for this study were gathered from nursing staff during a period when there was a heightened risk of an outbreak. METHODS: The data for this study were gathered using a structured, self-administered questionnaire, which was distributed to 127 nurses. A response rate of 72% was achieved. The questionnaire was based on the instrument used by Wong et al. in their 2008 study of preparedness for an avian influenza pandemic in Singapore. RESULTS: Although the results reveal a number of concerns raised by nurses, it is clear that the majority (90%) view treating and caring for influenza patients as core to their role. While recognising their professional responsibilities, they reveal apprehension about certain aspects of their work, such as an increased likelihood of infection, added workload and pressures, an increased concern for those close to them who could become infected as well as the overall increase in stress levels at work. The extent of professional and personal preparedness, together with the concerns and perceptions of nurses, could affect the hospital's overall capacity to respond and these concerns should be addressed by those responsible for the development of pandemic response plan.

Do industrial incidents in the chemical sector create equity market contagion?

INTRODUCTION: This paper examines a number of US chemical industry incidents and their effect on equity prices of the incident company. Furthermore, this paper then examines the contagion effect of this incident on direct competitors. METHOD: Event study methodology is used to assess the impact of chemical incidents on both incident and competitor companies. RESULTS: This paper finds that the incident company experiences deeper negative abnormal returns as the number of injuries and fatalities as a result of the incident increases. The equity value of the competitor companies suffer substantial losses stemming from contagion effects when disasters that occur cause ten or more injuries and fatalities, but benefit from the incident through increasing equity value when the level of injury and fatality is minor. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of contagion suggests collective action may reduce value destruction brought about by safety incidents that result in significant injury or loss of life. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This research can be used as a resource to promote and justify the cost of safety mechanisms within the chemical industry, as incidents have been shown to negatively affect the equity value of the not just the incident company, but also their direct competitors.