Inaccuracy of diagnosis in a cohort of patients on the waiting list for dacryocystorhinostomy when the diagnosis was made by only syringing the lacrimal system.

PURPOSE: Accurate identification of the factors contributing to epiphora is essential in directing appropriate management and treatment strategies. The authors applied a methodical strategy of assessment for epiphora to patients who were already on the waiting list for dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The findings were compared to the original findings. METHODS: Forty-four eyes of 35 patients listed for DCR were re-examined. All canaliculi were examined using four tests: dye disappearance, Jones 1 (dye retrieval), probing using Bowman probes, and syringing of the nasolacrimal duct (NLD) under local anesthesia. Some patients were examined using an endocanalicular mini-endoscope. Patients with NLD obstruction underwent DCR and those with canalicular and NLD stenosis underwent intubation of the lacrimal system-canaliculus, lacrimal sac, and nasolacrimal duct-using silicone stents. The authors refer to this as canaliculodacryocystoplasty (CDCP). The patients were assessed for symptoms of epiphora at 12 months. Forty-four eyes had been listed for DCR. They had been originally diagnosed, by means of lacrimal syringing, as NLD obstruction (24 eyes) or stenosis (12 eyes), and functional blocks (8 eyes). RESULTS: Four out of the original 44 planned DCR surgeries were performed after re-evaluation. After re-examination, 28 lacrimal systems were found to have canalicular stenosis, 4 NLD stenosis, 4 NLD obstruction, 4 punctal phimosis, 3 ocular surface disease, and 1 patient was asymptomatic. Twenty-eight lacrimal systems underwent CDCP, 4 underwent DCR, 4 had punctoplasty, and 4 had probing alone. Three had treatment for ocular surface disease and one patient required no treatment. After a follow-up of 12 months, 41 (93%) systems had improvement or were free of their CONCLUSIONS: Syringing of the lacrimal apparatus may result in a high false positive diagnosis of NLD obstruction. Canalicular pathology is not uncommon in this cohort of patients and may be underdiagnosed.

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy: phenotypic and genotypic studies in a UK population.

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is an autosomal dominant disorder of late onset that commonly presents with ptosis and dysphagia. The genetic basis of the condition has been identified recently as a stable trinucleotide repeat expansion in exon 1 of the poly(A) binding protein 2 gene (PABP2), in which (GCG)(6) is the normal repeat length. The prevalence of OPMD is greatest in patients of French-Canadian origin. It is not clear if expansion repeat length is a reliable test in other populations. In this study, we analysed the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of 31 patients with OPMD in the UK. Ptosis was the first reported symptom in two-thirds of the patients, and half of the subjects studied had evidence of ophthalmoplegia. All but one family had a pathological expansion in the PABP2 gene, ranging from (GCG)(8) to (GCG)(13). In contrast to the French-Canadian population, (GCG)(10) was almost as common as (GCG)(9), evidence against a strong founder effect in the UK population. There was a weak association between repeat length and age of disease onset. Patients with longer repeat lengths, such as (GCG)(13), developed severe limb weakness early in the disease. We were unable to detect the (GCG)(7) polymorphism in over 200 normal controls, suggesting that the frequency of this expansion is lower than that found in the French-Canadian population. One family was negative for the expansion. Affected members presented with the classical features of OPMD, namely ptosis, dysphagia and cytoplasmic inclusions on muscle biopsy, although with some atypical features, such as early age of onset, high serum levels of creatine kinase and a profound ophthalmoplegia. This family is an example of a GCG expansion-negative oculopharyngeal syndrome requiring further genetic investigation. We conclude that PABP2 analysis is a reliable non-invasive diagnostic test for OPMD in the UK population.

X linked dominant congenital isolated bilateral ptosis: the definition and characterisation of a new condition.

AIMS: To characterise the inheritance of ptosis in one particular pedigree. METHODS: The pedigree was analysed clinically and genetically to assess the mode of inheritance and to ascribe a gene locus for the condition. RESULTS: Affected members of the pedigree have bilateral symmetrical congenital isolated ptosis, a condition which is linked to genetic markers on the X chromosome in this family. CONCLUSION: A pedigree with dominantly inherited congenital bilateral ptosis is presented. The pedigree exhibits X linked dominant inheritance. A new ophthalmic condition was thereby characterised-namely, X linked dominant congenital isolated bilateral ptosis.

A novel X-linked dominant condition: X-linked congenital isolated ptosis.

We present a large family with a previously undescribed condition: X-linked dominant congenital bilateral isolated ptosis. Linkage analysis defined a critical region between Xq24 and Xq27.1, with a maximum single-point LOD score of 2.88 at DXS1047 and DXS984. Male and female family members are equally affected, providing an example of an X-linked, truly dominant condition.