Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 355(2): 125-37, 2006 Jul 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16837676

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effect of raloxifene, a selective estrogen-receptor modulator, on coronary heart disease (CHD) and breast cancer is not established. METHODS: We randomly assigned 10,101 postmenopausal women (mean age, 67.5 years) with CHD or multiple risk factors for CHD to 60 mg of raloxifene daily or placebo and followed them for a median of 5.6 years. The two primary outcomes were coronary events (i.e., death from coronary causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome) and invasive breast cancer. RESULTS: As compared with placebo, raloxifene had no significant effect on the risk of primary coronary events (533 vs. 553 events; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.07), and it reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer (40 vs. 70 events; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.83; absolute risk reduction, 1.2 invasive breast cancers per 1000 women treated for one year); the benefit was primarily due to a reduced risk of estrogen-receptor-positive invasive breast cancers. There was no significant difference in the rates of death from any cause or total stroke according to group assignment, but raloxifene was associated with an increased risk of fatal stroke (59 vs. 39 events; hazard ratio, 1.49; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.00 to 2.24; absolute risk increase, 0.7 per 1000 woman-years) and venous thromboembolism (103 vs. 71 events; hazard ratio, 1.44; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.95; absolute risk increase, 1.2 per 1000 woman-years). Raloxifene reduced the risk of clinical vertebral fractures (64 vs. 97 events; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.47 to 0.89; absolute risk reduction, 1.3 per 1000). CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene did not significantly affect the risk of CHD. The benefits of raloxifene in reducing the risks of invasive breast cancer and vertebral fracture should be weighed against the increased risks of venous thromboembolism and fatal stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00190593 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/uso terapêutico , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/efeitos adversos , Risco , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/efeitos adversos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia/epidemiologia
2.
J Bone Miner Res ; 20(11): 1912-20, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16234963

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: In the placebo group of the MORE study, including 2576 postmenopausal women (mean age, 66.5 years), the authors describe a strong linear association between the severity grade of osteoporosis (from low BMD to presence of severe vertebral fractures) and the future risk of cardiovascular events. Accordingly, treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis should include consideration of measures to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes. INTRODUCTION: Observations indicate an inverse association between BMD and the severity of peripheral atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women. The predictive value of osteoporosis and its different severity stages for the risk of acute cardiovascular events remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were 2576 women (mean age, 66.5 years) assigned to placebo and followed for 4 years in an osteoporosis treatment trial. Those with at least one vertebral fracture or total hip BMD T score < or = -2.5 at baseline were defined as having osteoporosis, whereas those without vertebral fracture and total hip BMD T score between -2.5 and -1 were defined as having low bone mass. The primary outcome for these posthoc analyses was the incidence of adjudicated fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, women with osteoporosis had a 3.9-fold (95% CI, 2.0-7.7; p < 0.001) increased risk for cardiovascular events compared with women with low bone mass. Under the same boundaries, a total hip BMD T score < or = -2.5 versus a T score between -2.5 and -1 was associated with a 2.1-fold (95% CI, 1.2-3.6; p < 0.01) increase in risk, whereas presence of at least one vertebral fracture versus no vertebral fracture at baseline was associated with a 3.0-fold (95% CI, 1.8-5.1; p < 0.001) increase in risk. The risk of cardiovascular events increased incrementally with the number and increasing severity of baseline vertebral fractures (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis are at an increased risk for cardiovascular events that is proportional to the severity of osteoporosis at the time of the diagnosis. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis should include consideration of measures to prevent cardiovascular outcomes.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Pós-Menopausa , Idoso , Densidade Óssea , Doença das Coronárias/complicações , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...