Comparative efficacy of clearing-dose and single high-dose ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine against Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaremia.

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of various combinations of low- and high-dose ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine (DEC), 59 persons with Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaremia were enrolled in a double-blinded six-arm clinical trial in Leogane, Haiti. On day 1, study participants were treated with low clearing doses of ivermectin, DEC, or placebo; on day 5 they received 200-400 micrograms/kg of ivermectin or 6 mg/kg of DEC. Adverse reactions, which were generally mild, occurred more frequently with ivermectin than with DEC. One year after treatment, the geometric mean microfilarial density returned to 0.9% of pretreatment levels for persons who received a total of 420 micrograms/kg of ivermectin. This rate was significantly lower than 5.6% for persons who were treated with 220 micrograms/kg of ivermectin (P = 0.02) and 9.3% for those receiving 6 or 7 mg/kg of DEC (P = 0.006). Persons treated with a clearing dose of ivermectin followed by 6 mg/kg of DEC also had low microfilarial densities (1.7% of pretreatment levels), suggesting an additive or synergistic effect of the two drugs. The addition of a clearing dose neither reduced the severity of adverse reactions nor improved the efficacy of high-dose ivermectin. Community-based intervention trials are now warranted to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of mass chemotherapy with single high-dose ivermectin for the prevention and control of lymphatic filariasis.

Alterations in filarial antigen-specific immunologic reactivity following treatment with ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine.

The presence of circulating microfilariae has been associated with alterations in B and T cell functions. In this study, we compared the influence of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and ivermectin on filarial antigen-specific immune responses in a Haitian population. Both drugs were effective at reducing microfilaremia levels to less than 10% of pretreatment levels for up to one year. This reduction in microfilaremia was associated with two phases of altered cellular responsiveness monitored with in vitro assays. Five days post-treatment, cellular proliferation in response to both filarial and nonfilarial antigens was significantly increased, as was the background response in the absence of any antigen. At both nine months and one year post-treatment, the filarial antigen-specific reactivity of both DEC- and ivermectin-treated patients was significantly increased over baseline levels. No differences were observed between the two treatment groups in terms of humoral or cellular reactivity to filarial antigens, despite evidence suggesting a role for DEC in adult worm killing. These results provide additional evidence that microfilariae modulate antifilarial immune reactivity.

Comparison of high dose ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine for activity against bancroftian filariasis in Haiti.

This three-phase study was designed to compare high dose ivermectin with a standard diethylcarbamazine (DEC) regimen for patient tolerability, potential to kill adult filaria, and duration of microfilarial suppression in 30 Haitian subjects with Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaremia. All were first given a 1-mg oral dose of ivermectin (phase 1) to reduce microfilaria densities. Participants were randomized into three groups: Group 1 received DEC (6mg/kg per day for 12 days), Group 2 received 200 mcg/kg of ivermectin, and Group 3 received 400 mcg/kg of ivermectin (200 mcg/kg per day for 2 days). All drug regimens were well tolerated with few adverse reactions. Most reactions occurred during phase I and consisted primarily of headache, fever, and myalgia. At the end of phase 1, 27 of 30 (90%) patients were microfilaria negative. During phase 2, four of the six men receiving DEC developed scrotal reactions suggesting killing adult worms; no such reactions were noted in 10 men receiving ivermectin (p less than 0.05). At one-year follow up (phase 3), all treatment groups had less than 10% return to pretreatment microfilaria levels. The mean percent of baseline microfilaria counts were for Group 1, 0.9% (range 0-5%); Group 2, 8.2% (range 0-31%); and Group 3, 3.8% (range 0-25%). Seven individuals in Group 1 were microfilaria-negative, while only one and three individuals were microfilaria-negative in Groups 2 and 3, respectively. These results suggest that DEC causes more damage to the adult worms and greater reduction in microfilaria densities than ivermectin, but that high doses of ivermectin may suppress microfilaremia in lymphatic filariasis for periods much longer than previously reported.