Effectiveness of interventions to support the early detection of skin cancer through skin self-examination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: As skin cancer incidence rises, there is a need to evaluate early detection interventions by the public using skin self-examination (SSE); however, the literature focuses on primary prevention. No systematic reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of such SSE interventions. OBJECTIVES: To systematically examine, map, appraise and synthesize, qualitatively and quantitatively, studies evaluating the early detection of skin cancer, using SSE interventions. METHODS: This is a systematic review (narrative synthesis and meta-analysis) examining randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasiexperimental, observational and qualitative studies, published in English, using PRISMA and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. The MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO databases were searched through to April 2015 (updated in April 2018 using MEDLINE). Risk-of-bias assessment was conducted. RESULTS: Included studies (n = 18), totalling 6836 participants, were derived from 22 papers; these included 12 RCTs and five quasiexperiments and one complex-intervention development. More studies (n = 10) focused on targeting high-risk groups (surveillance) than those at no higher risk (screening) (n = 8). Ten (45%) study interventions were theoretically underpinned. All of the study outcomes were self-reported, behaviour related and nonclinical in nature. Meta-analysis demonstrated the impact of the intervention on the degree of SSE activity from five studies, especially in the short term (up to 4 months) (odds ratio 2·31, 95% confidence interval 1·90-2·82), but with small effect sizes. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated that 61% of the studies (n = 11) were of weak quality. CONCLUSIONS: Four RCTs and a quasiexperimental study indicate that some interventions can enhance SSE activity and so are more likely to aid early detection of skin cancer. However, the actual clinical impact remains unclear, and this is based on overall weak study (evidence) quality.

The Management of Chronic Back Pain in Primary Care Settings: Exploring Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to the Development of Patient-Professional Partnerships.

Supporting patients in forming partnerships with health professionals is the key of effective self-management. This study aimed to explore the nature of patient-professional partnerships and its related factors that create facilitators and barriers to patients' self-management ability. A constructivist grounded theory approach was undertaken. Three main themes emerged: interaction and communication, integrated care, and service and system. A theoretical model was generated that posits effective communication, individualized integrated care, and high-quality service as key influences on the successful development of patient-professional partnerships and patients' ability to self-manage. Giving attention to these factors helps understand the development, implementation, mechanisms, and evaluation of building a patient-professional partnership and maximizes the opportunities for patient self-management of chronic pain. Future research and practice are needed to move beyond a simplistic focus on health outcomes to address the complex links between partnerships and treatment delivery processes, and interventions, effects, and patients' context.

The association between patient-professional partnerships and self-management of chronic back pain: A mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Self-management is recommended for patients with chronic back pain. Health professionals' support for self-management can be more effective when working in partnership with patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between patient-professional partnerships and the self-management of chronic back pain. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study was undertaken. Adults with chronic back pain referred to pain management clinics participated at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Their pain severity, partnerships with health professionals and self-management ability were measured. Hierarchical linear regression was undertaken to examine the strength of the associations between partnerships and self-management. A subsample was interviewed about experiences of the impact of patient-professional partnerships on their self-management ability, using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were recruited and 103 (70%) patients completed the follow-up. A strong association (p < 0.001) was detected between patient-professional partnerships and all dimensions of self-management ability. This was validated by interviews with a subsample of 26 patients. Four themes emerged as follows: connecting with health professionals, being supported through partnerships, feeling positive and making progress towards self-management, and acknowledging the impact but feeling no difference. CONCLUSIONS: Developing a partnership in care may improve patients' ability to gain knowledge, manage side effects and symptoms and adhere to treatment. It helped strengthen health professionals' support and produce a sense of safety for patients. Guiding health professionals in building partnerships where expectations are acknowledged and tailored information and support are provided could be considered as part of the standard education and training. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identified and validated strong associations between patient-professional partnerships and self-management. Support for self-management alone may not be sufficient, and building partnerships where patients and professionals work together towards agreed goals make an essential contribution to helping increase patients' ability to self-manage chronic back pain.

A qualitative study utilizing a focus group to explore the role and concept of the nurse practitioner.

This paper describes the first part of a two-stage study exploring the concept of the nurse practitioner role. By utilization of a focus group methodology, data were collated from a cohort of eight RCN trained nurse practitioners. The transcript from their discussion was subjected to a qualitative-based content analysis. Eight categories emerged from the data and this paper explores four of them. These are: role recognition, feature of the nurse practitioner role, nurse/patient relationship and doctor/patient relationship. As a whole the focus group discussion highlighted the diversity in application of the nurse practitioner title. This in part, reflects the rapidly evolving role and the ongoing debate regarding the terms advanced and specialist practitioner.

Can a mental health nurse be a nurse practitioner?

This paper is part of a larger study examining the role of the nurse practitioner and its potential utility in mental health nursing. Two methods were employed for data collection: a focus group interview with eight RCN qualified nurse practitioners, the result of which informed the development of a postal questionnaire which was distributed to the remaining RCN qualified nurse practitioners (n = 130). Forty seven respondents did not feel adequately equipped to assess a mental health problem, despite nearly a third identifying mental health issues as a primary problem with which their patients presented. Just over 40 per cent of respondents stated that mental health needs were not met within their community and 78.7 per cent of respondents supported the development of a mental health nurse practitioner. In light of these findings the concept of a mental health nurse practitioner is discussed, alongside the need to clarify other advanced nursing roles.