Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Med Care ; 58(12): 1069-1074, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding differences between patients referred to hospice from different care locations. OBJECTIVE: The objective this study was to describe the associations between hospice referral locations and hospice patient and admission characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of hospice administrative data. SUBJECTS: Adult (age older than 18 y) decedents of a national, for-profit, hospice chain across 19 US states who died between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. MEASURES: Patients' primary hospice diagnosis, hospice length stay, and hospice care site. We also determined the frequency of opioid prescriptions with and without a bowel regimen on hospice admission. RESULTS: Among 78,647 adult decedents, the mean age was 79.2 (SD=13.5) years, 56.4% were female, and 69.9% were a non-Hispanic White race. Most hospice referrals were from the hospital (51.9%), followed by the community (21.9%), nursing homes (17.4%), and assisted living (8.8%). Cancer (33.6%) was the most prevalent primary hospice diagnosis; however, this varied significantly between referral locations (P<0.001). Similarly, home hospice (32.8%) was the most prevalent site; however, this also varied significantly between referral locations (P<0.001). More hospital-referred patients (55.6%) had a hospice length of stay <7 days compared with patients referred from nursing homes (30.3%), the community (28.9%), or assisted living (18.7%), P<0.001. Hospital-referred patients also had the lowest frequency (58.4%) of coprescribed opioids and bowel regimen on hospice admission compared with other referral locations. CONCLUSION: We observed significant differences in hospice patient and admission characteristics by referral location.


Assuntos
Hospitais para Doentes Terminais/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Constipação Induzida por Opioides/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 33(7): 638-43, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26261375

RESUMO

PURPOSE: End-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presents health care providers with challenges of providing optimal palliative care for patients who follow a less predictable trajectory. The objectives of this study were to evaluate medications being prescribed to patients with end-stage COPD, compared to recommendations made by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, and to determine which medications were provided by the hospice organization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database for medications pertaining to COPD management as stated in the GOLD criteria or those used for symptoms associated with end of life. RESULTS: A total of 745 patients met inclusion criteria, and approximately 63% were prescribed opioids. Prescribing rates for oxygen, short-acting ß2-agonists, and short-acting anticholinergics were 37%, 33%, and 31%, respectively. Systemic and inhaled corticosteroids were prescribed at higher rates of 20% and 18% compared to long-acting bronchodilators. DISCUSSION: Medications used for COPD exacerbation management were prescribed at higher rate than those used for maintenance treatment.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Masculino , Oxigenoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 7(2): 203-9, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24524594

RESUMO

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is difficult to treat, partially because the underlying mechanism of pain is not fully understood. Various treatment guidelines recommend first-line agents, such as α2-δ ligands, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants but combination therapy of alternative agents including opiates is often warranted. Tapentadol extended-release has a novel dual mechanism of action; it is both a mu-opioid receptor agonist and a norephinephrine reuptake inhibitor. It has been in the spotlight since it was FDA-approved specifically for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in 2012. Previous reviews of tapentadol have focused on chronic pain. The purpose of this review article is to assess the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended-release in adult populations with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy and provide guidance for formulary decisions.


Assuntos
Neuropatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Fenóis/uso terapêutico , Receptores Opioides mu/agonistas , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/farmacologia , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Tomada de Decisões , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Neuropatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Formulários Farmacêuticos como Assunto , Humanos , Fenóis/administração & dosagem , Fenóis/farmacologia , Tapentadol
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...