Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(19): 435-440, 2024 May 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753567

RESUMO

Clade I monkeypox virus (MPXV), which can cause severe illness in more people than clade II MPXVs, is endemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), but the country has experienced an increase in suspected cases during 2023-2024. In light of the 2022 global outbreak of clade II mpox, the increase in suspected clade I cases in DRC raises concerns that the virus could spread to other countries and underscores the importance of coordinated, urgent global action to support DRC's efforts to contain the virus. To date, no cases of clade I mpox have been detected outside of countries in Central Africa where the virus is endemic. CDC and other partners are working to support DRC's response. In addition, CDC is enhancing U.S. preparedness by raising awareness, strengthening surveillance, expanding diagnostic testing capacity for clade I MPXV, ensuring appropriate specimen handling and waste management, emphasizing the importance of appropriate medical treatment, and communicating guidance on the recommended contact tracing, containment, behavior modification, and vaccination strategies.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Mpox , República Democrática do Congo/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Mpox/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Monkeypox virus/isolamento & purificação
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(20): 547-552, 2023 May 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37200231

RESUMO

Monkeypox (mpox) is a serious viral zoonosis endemic in west and central Africa. An unprecedented global outbreak was first detected in May 2022. CDC activated its emergency outbreak response on May 23, 2022, and the outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on July 23, 2022, by the World Health Organization (WHO),* and a U.S. Public Health Emergency on August 4, 2022, by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.† A U.S. government response was initiated, and CDC coordinated activities with the White House, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and many other federal, state, and local partners. CDC quickly adapted surveillance systems, diagnostic tests, vaccines, therapeutics, grants, and communication systems originally developed for U.S. smallpox preparedness and other infectious diseases to fit the unique needs of the outbreak. In 1 year, more than 30,000 U.S. mpox cases were reported, more than 140,000 specimens were tested, >1.2 million doses of vaccine were administered, and more than 6,900 patients were treated with tecovirimat, an antiviral medication with activity against orthopoxviruses such as Variola virus and Monkeypox virus. Non-Hispanic Black (Black) and Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) persons represented 33% and 31% of mpox cases, respectively; 87% of 42 fatal cases occurred in Black persons. Sexual contact among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) was rapidly identified as the primary risk for infection, resulting in profound changes in our scientific understanding of mpox clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and transmission dynamics. This report provides an overview of the first year of the response to the U.S. mpox outbreak by CDC, reviews lessons learned to improve response and future readiness, and previews continued mpox response and prevention activities as local viral transmission continues in multiple U.S. jurisdictions (Figure).


Assuntos
Mpox , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Mpox/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(45): 1449-1456, 2022 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36355615

RESUMO

On May 17, 2022, the Massachusetts Department of Health announced the first suspected case of monkeypox associated with the global outbreak in a U.S. resident. On May 23, 2022, CDC launched an emergency response (1,2). CDC's emergency response focused on surveillance, laboratory testing, medical countermeasures, and education. Medical countermeasures included rollout of a national JYNNEOS vaccination strategy, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issuance of an emergency use authorization to allow for intradermal administration of JYNNEOS, and use of tecovirimat for patients with, or at risk for, severe monkeypox. During May 17-October 6, 2022, a total of 26,384 probable and confirmed* U.S. monkeypox cases were reported to CDC. Daily case counts peaked during mid-to-late August. Among 25,001 of 25,569 (98%) cases in adults with information on gender identity,† 23,683 (95%) occurred in cisgender men. Among 13,997 cisgender men with information on recent sexual or close intimate contact,§ 10,440 (75%) reported male-to-male sexual contact (MMSC) ≤21 days preceding symptom onset. Among 21,211 (80%) cases in persons with information on race and ethnicity,¶ 6,879 (32%), 6,628 (31%), and 6,330 (30%) occurred in non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black), Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic), and non-Hispanic White (White) persons, respectively. Among 5,017 (20%) cases in adults with information on HIV infection status, 2,876 (57%) had HIV infection. Prevention efforts, including vaccination, should be prioritized among persons at highest risk within groups most affected by the monkeypox outbreak, including gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM); transgender, nonbinary, and gender-diverse persons; racial and ethnic minority groups; and persons who are immunocompromised, including persons with advanced HIV infection or newly diagnosed HIV infection.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Mpox , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Homossexualidade Masculina , Etnicidade , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Mpox/epidemiologia , Grupos Minoritários , Identidade de Gênero , Causas de Morte , Surtos de Doenças
5.
Science ; 378(6619): 560-565, 2022 11 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36264825

RESUMO

Monkeypox is a viral zoonotic disease endemic in Central and West Africa. In May 2022, dozens of non-endemic countries reported hundreds of monkeypox cases, most with no epidemiological link to Africa. We identified two lineages of monkeypox virus (MPXV) among two 2021 and seven 2022 US monkeypox cases: the major 2022 outbreak variant called B.1 and a minor contemporaneously sampled variant called A.2. Analyses of mutations among these two variants revealed an extreme preference for GA-to-AA mutations indicative of human APOBEC3 cytosine deaminase activity among Clade IIb MPXV (previously West African, Nigeria) sampled since 2017. Such mutations were not enriched within other MPXV clades. These findings suggest that APOBEC3 editing may be a recurrent and a dominant driver of MPXV evolution within the current outbreak.


Assuntos
Desaminases APOBEC , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Monkeypox virus , Mpox , Edição de RNA , Humanos , Mpox/enzimologia , Mpox/virologia , Monkeypox virus/genética , Monkeypox virus/isolamento & purificação , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Mutação , Evolução Molecular , Desaminases APOBEC/metabolismo , Adenosina/genética , Citidina/genética
6.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(7)2022 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35891157

RESUMO

Zoonotic diseases represent a heavy global burden, causing important economic losses, impacting animal health and production, and costing millions of human lives. The vaccination of animals and humans to prevent inter-species zoonotic disease transmission is an important intervention. However, efforts to develop and implement vaccine interventions to reduce zoonotic disease impacts are often limited to the veterinary and agricultural sectors and do not reflect the shared burden of disease. Multisectoral collaboration, including co-development opportunities for human and animal vaccines, expanding vaccine use to include animal reservoirs such as wildlife, and strategically using vaccines to interrupt complex transmission cycles is needed. Addressing zoonoses requires a multi-faceted One Health approach, wherein vaccinating people and animals plays a critical role.

7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(23): 764-769, 2022 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35679181

RESUMO

On May 17, 2022, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) Laboratory Response Network (LRN) laboratory confirmed the presence of orthopoxvirus DNA via real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from lesion swabs obtained from a Massachusetts resident. Orthopoxviruses include Monkeypox virus, the causative agent of monkeypox. Subsequent real-time PCR testing at CDC on May 18 confirmed that the patient was infected with the West African clade of Monkeypox virus. Since then, confirmed cases* have been reported by nine states. In addition, 28 countries and territories,† none of which has endemic monkeypox, have reported laboratory-confirmed cases. On May 17, CDC, in coordination with state and local jurisdictions, initiated an emergency response to identify, monitor, and investigate additional monkeypox cases in the United States. This response has included releasing a Health Alert Network (HAN) Health Advisory, developing interim public health and clinical recommendations, releasing guidance for LRN testing, hosting clinician and public health partner outreach calls, disseminating health communication messages to the public, developing protocols for use and release of medical countermeasures, and facilitating delivery of vaccine postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) and antivirals that have been stockpiled by the U.S. government for preparedness and response purposes. On May 19, a call center was established to provide guidance to states for the evaluation of possible cases of monkeypox, including recommendations for clinical diagnosis and orthopoxvirus testing. The call center also gathers information about possible cases to identify interjurisdictional linkages. As of May 31, this investigation has identified 17§ cases in the United States; most cases (16) were diagnosed in persons who identify as gay, bisexual, or men who have sex with men (MSM). Ongoing investigation suggests person-to-person community transmission, and CDC urges health departments, clinicians, and the public to remain vigilant, institute appropriate infection prevention and control measures, and notify public health authorities of suspected cases to reduce disease spread. Public health authorities are identifying cases and conducting investigations to determine possible sources and prevent further spread. This activity was reviewed by CDC and conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.¶.


Assuntos
Malária , Mpox , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Surtos de Doenças , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Malária/diagnóstico , Masculino , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Viagem , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(14): 509-516, 2022 Apr 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35389974

RESUMO

Monkeypox is a rare, sometimes life-threatening zoonotic infection that occurs in west and central Africa. It is caused by Monkeypox virus, an orthopoxvirus similar to Variola virus (the causative agent of smallpox) and Vaccinia virus (the live virus component of orthopoxvirus vaccines) and can spread to humans. After 39 years without detection of human disease in Nigeria, an outbreak involving 118 confirmed cases was identified during 2017-2018 (1); sporadic cases continue to occur. During September 2018-May 2021, six unrelated persons traveling from Nigeria received diagnoses of monkeypox in non-African countries: four in the United Kingdom and one each in Israel and Singapore. In July 2021, a man who traveled from Lagos, Nigeria, to Dallas, Texas, became the seventh traveler to a non-African country with diagnosed monkeypox. Among 194 monitored contacts, 144 (74%) were flight contacts. The patient received tecovirimat, an antiviral for treatment of orthopoxvirus infections, and his home required large-scale decontamination. Whole genome sequencing showed that the virus was consistent with a strain of Monkeypox virus known to circulate in Nigeria, but the specific source of the patient's infection was not identified. No epidemiologically linked cases were reported in Nigeria; no contact received postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) with the orthopoxvirus vaccine ACAM2000.


Assuntos
Mpox , Humanos , Masculino , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/epidemiologia , Mpox/prevenção & controle , Monkeypox virus/genética , Nigéria/epidemiologia , Texas/epidemiologia
9.
J Infect Dis ; 222(8): 1311-1319, 2020 09 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484879

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During 2017, a multistate outbreak investigation occurred after the confirmation of Seoul virus (SEOV) infections in people and pet rats. A total of 147 humans and 897 rats were tested. METHODS: In addition to immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM serology and traditional reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), novel quantitative RT-PCR primers/probe were developed, and whole genome sequencing was performed. RESULTS: Seventeen people had SEOV IgM, indicating recent infection; 7 reported symptoms and 3 were hospitalized. All patients recovered. Thirty-one facilities in 11 US states had SEOV infection, and among those with ≥10 rats tested, rat IgG prevalence ranged 2%-70% and SEOV RT-PCR positivity ranged 0%-70%. Human laboratory-confirmed cases were significantly associated with rat IgG positivity and RT-PCR positivity (P = .03 and P = .006, respectively). Genomic sequencing identified >99.5% homology between SEOV sequences in this outbreak, and these were >99% identical to SEOV associated with previous pet rat infections in England, the Netherlands, and France. Frequent trade of rats between home-based ratteries contributed to transmission of SEOV between facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Pet rat owners, breeders, and the healthcare and public health community should be aware and take steps to prevent SEOV transmission in pet rats and to humans. Biosecurity measures and diagnostic testing can prevent further infections.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Febre Hemorrágica com Síndrome Renal/transmissão , Doenças dos Roedores/transmissão , Vírus Seoul/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Cruzamento , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/veterinária , Surtos de Doenças/veterinária , Genoma Viral/genética , Febre Hemorrágica com Síndrome Renal/diagnóstico , Febre Hemorrágica com Síndrome Renal/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Animais de Estimação/virologia , Filogenia , Prevalência , RNA Viral/genética , Ratos , Doenças dos Roedores/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Roedores/epidemiologia , Vírus Seoul/classificação , Vírus Seoul/genética , Vírus Seoul/imunologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Zoonoses Virais/diagnóstico , Zoonoses Virais/epidemiologia , Zoonoses Virais/transmissão , Adulto Jovem
10.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 13(7): e0007562, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31329598

RESUMO

Chikungunya, a mosquito-borne viral, acute febrile illness (AFI) is associated with polyarthralgia and polyarthritis. Differentiation from other AFI is difficult due to the non-specific presentation and limited availability of diagnostics. This 3-year study identified independent clinical predictors by day post-illness onset (DPO) at presentation and age-group that distinguish chikungunya cases from two groups: other AFI and dengue. Specimens collected from participants with fever ≤7 days were tested for chikungunya, dengue viruses 1-4, and 20 other pathogens. Of 8,996 participants, 18.2% had chikungunya, and 10.8% had dengue. Chikungunya cases were more likely than other groups to be older, report a chronic condition, and present <3 DPO. Regardless of timing of presentation, significant positive predictors for chikungunya versus other AFI were: joint pain, muscle, bone or back pain, skin rash, and red conjunctiva; with dengue as the comparator, red swollen joints (arthritis), joint pain, skin rash, any bleeding, and irritability were predictors. Chikungunya cases were less likely than AFI and dengue to present with thrombocytopenia, signs of poor circulation, diarrhea, headache, and cough. Among participants presenting <3 DPO, predictors for chikungunya versus other AFI included: joint pain, skin rash, and muscle, bone or back pain, and absence of thrombocytopenia, poor circulation and respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms; when the comparator was dengue, joint pain and arthritis, and absence of thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and nausea were early predictors. Among all groups presenting 3-5 DPO, pruritic skin became a predictor for chikungunya, joint, muscle, bone or back pain were no longer predictive, while arthritis became predictive in all age-groups. Absence of thrombocytopenia was a significant predictor regardless of DPO or comparison group. This study identified robust clinical indicators such as joint pain, skin rash and absence of thrombocytopenia that can allow early identification of and accurate differentiation between patients with chikungunya and other common causes of AFI.


Assuntos
Febre de Chikungunya/diagnóstico , Dengue/diagnóstico , Febre/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Porto Rico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Adulto Jovem
11.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 11(9): e0005859, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28902845

RESUMO

Identifying etiologies of acute febrile illnesses (AFI) is challenging due to non-specific presentation and limited availability of diagnostics. Prospective AFI studies provide a methodology to describe the syndrome by age and etiology, findings that can be used to develop case definitions and multiplexed diagnostics to optimize management. We conducted a 3-year prospective AFI study in Puerto Rico. Patients with fever ≤7 days were offered enrollment, and clinical data and specimens were collected at enrollment and upon discharge or follow-up. Blood and oro-nasopharyngeal specimens were tested by RT-PCR and immunodiagnostic methods for infection with dengue viruses (DENV) 1-4, chikungunya virus (CHIKV), influenza A and B viruses (FLU A/B), 12 other respiratory viruses (ORV), enterovirus, Leptospira spp., and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Clinical presentation and laboratory findings of participants infected with DENV were compared to those infected with CHIKV, FLU A/B, and ORV. Clinical predictors of laboratory-positive dengue compared to all other AFI etiologies were determined by age and day post-illness onset (DPO) at presentation. Of 8,996 participants enrolled from May 7, 2012 through May 6, 2015, more than half (54.8%, 4,930) had a pathogen detected. Pathogens most frequently detected were CHIKV (1,635, 18.2%), FLU A/B (1,074, 11.9%), DENV 1-4 (970, 10.8%), and ORV (904, 10.3%). Participants with DENV infection presented later and a higher proportion were hospitalized than those with other diagnoses (46.7% versus 27.3% with ORV, 18.8% with FLU A/B, and 11.2% with CHIKV). Predictors of dengue in participants presenting <3 DPO included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, headache, eye pain, nausea, and dizziness, while negative predictors were irritability and rhinorrhea. Predictors of dengue in participants presenting 3-5 DPO were leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, facial/neck erythema, nausea, eye pain, signs of poor circulation, and diarrhea; presence of rhinorrhea, cough, and red conjunctiva predicted non-dengue AFI. By enrolling febrile patients at clinical presentation, we identified unbiased predictors of laboratory-positive dengue as compared to other common causes of AFI. These findings can be used to assist in early identification of dengue patients, as well as direct anticipatory guidance and timely initiation of correct clinical management.


Assuntos
Febre de Chikungunya/epidemiologia , Dengue/epidemiologia , Febre/epidemiologia , Febre/etiologia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Leucopenia/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Porto Rico/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Sexo , Trombocitopenia/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
MMWR Suppl ; 65(3): 68-74, 2016 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27386834

RESUMO

During the response to the 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease (Ebola) epidemic in West Africa, CDC addressed the disease on two fronts: in the epidemic epicenter of West Africa and at home in the United States. Different needs drove the demand for information in these two regions. The severity of the epidemic was reflected not only in lives lost but also in the amount of fear, misinformation, and stigma that it generated worldwide. CDC helped increase awareness, promoted actions to stop the spread of Ebola, and coordinated CDC communication efforts with multiple international and domestic partners. CDC, with input from partners, vastly increased the number of Ebola communication materials for groups with different needs, levels of health literacy, and cultural preferences. CDC deployed health communicators to West Africa to support ministries of health in developing and disseminating clear, science-based messages and promoting science-based behavioral interventions. Partnerships in West Africa with local radio, television, and cell phone businesses made possible the dissemination of messages appropriate for maximum effect. CDC and its partners communicated evolving science and risk in a culturally appropriate way to motivate persons to adapt their behavior and prevent infection with and spread of Ebola virus. Acknowledging what is and is not known is key to effective risk communication, and CDC worked with partners to integrate health promotion and behavioral and cultural knowledge into the response to increase awareness of the actual risk for Ebola and to promote protective actions and specific steps to stop its spread. The activities summarized in this report would not have been possible without collaboration with many U.S. and international partners (http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/partners.html).


Assuntos
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organização & administração , Comunicação , Epidemias/prevenção & controle , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Risco , África Ocidental/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
13.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 95(2): 452-6, 2016 08 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27352876

RESUMO

In August 2012, laboratory tests confirmed a mixed outbreak of epidemic typhus fever and trench fever in a male youth rehabilitation center in western Rwanda. Seventy-six suspected cases and 118 controls were enrolled into an unmatched case-control study to identify risk factors for symptomatic illness during the outbreak. A suspected case was fever or history of fever, from April 2012, in a resident of the rehabilitation center. In total, 199 suspected cases from a population of 1,910 male youth (attack rate = 10.4%) with seven deaths (case fatality rate = 3.5%) were reported. After multivariate analysis, history of seeing lice in clothing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-5.8), delayed (≥ 2 days) washing of clothing (aOR = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.6-9.6), and delayed (≥ 1 month) washing of beddings (aOR = 4.6, 95% CI = 2.0-11) were associated with illness, whereas having stayed in the rehabilitation camp for ≥ 6 months was protective (aOR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.10-0.40). Stronger surveillance and improvements in hygiene could prevent future outbreaks.


Assuntos
Bartonella quintana/isolamento & purificação , Surtos de Doenças , Ftirápteros/microbiologia , Rickettsia prowazekii/isolamento & purificação , Febre das Trincheiras/epidemiologia , Tifo Epidêmico Transmitido por Piolhos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Bartonella quintana/patogenicidade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Coinfecção , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Centros de Reabilitação , Rickettsia prowazekii/patogenicidade , Fatores de Risco , Ruanda/epidemiologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Febre das Trincheiras/diagnóstico , Febre das Trincheiras/mortalidade , Febre das Trincheiras/transmissão , Tifo Epidêmico Transmitido por Piolhos/diagnóstico , Tifo Epidêmico Transmitido por Piolhos/mortalidade , Tifo Epidêmico Transmitido por Piolhos/transmissão
14.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 93(3): 549-551, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26033020

RESUMO

Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is an emerging public health issue on some American Indian reservations in Arizona. RMSF causes an acute febrile illness that, if untreated, can cause severe illness, permanent sequelae requiring lifelong medical support, and death. We describe costs associated with medical care, loss of productivity, and death among cases of RMSF on two American Indian reservations (estimated population 20,000) between 2002 and 2011. Acute medical costs totaled more than $1.3 million. This study further estimated $181,100 in acute productivity lost due to illness, and $11.6 million in lifetime productivity lost from premature death. Aggregate costs of RMSF cases in Arizona 2002-2011 amounted to $13.2 million. We believe this to be a significant underestimate of the cost of the epidemic, but it underlines the severity of the disease and need for a more comprehensive study.


Assuntos
Epidemias/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Arizona/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Epidemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/epidemiologia , Licença Médica/economia , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Pediatr ; 166(5): 1246-51, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25794784

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether cosmetically relevant dental effects occurred among children who had received doxycycline for treatment of suspected Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF). STUDY DESIGN: Children who lived on an American Indian reservation with high incidence of RMSF were classified as exposed or unexposed to doxycycline, based on medical and pharmacy record abstraction. Licensed, trained dentists examined each child's teeth and evaluated visible staining patterns and enamel hypoplasia. Objective tooth color was evaluated with a spectrophotometer. RESULTS: Fifty-eight children who received an average of 1.8 courses of doxycycline before 8 years of age and who now had exposed permanent teeth erupted were compared with 213 children who had never received doxycycline. No tetracycline-like staining was observed in any of the exposed children's teeth (0/58, 95% CI 0%-5%), and no significant difference in tooth shade (P=.20) or hypoplasia (P=1.0) was found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate dental staining, enamel hypoplasia, or tooth color differences among children who received short-term courses of doxycycline at <8 years of age. Healthcare provider confidence in use of doxycycline for suspected RMSF in children may be improved by modifying the drug's label.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Esmalte Dentário/efeitos dos fármacos , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/tratamento farmacológico , Dente/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Criança , Cor , Doxiciclina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espectrofotometria , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(11): 1650-8, 2015 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25697743

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) has emerged as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality since 2002 on tribal lands in Arizona. The explosive nature of this outbreak and the recognition of an unexpected tick vector, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, prompted an investigation to characterize RMSF in this unique setting and compare RMSF cases to similar illnesses. METHODS: We compared medical records of 205 patients with RMSF and 175 with non-RMSF illnesses that prompted RMSF testing during 2002-2011 from 2 Indian reservations in Arizona. RESULTS: RMSF cases in Arizona occurred year-round and peaked later (July-September) than RMSF cases reported from other US regions. Cases were younger (median age, 11 years) and reported fever and rash less frequently, compared to cases from other US regions. Fever was present in 81% of cases but not significantly different from that in patients with non-RMSF illnesses. Classic laboratory abnormalities such as low sodium and platelet counts had small and subtle differences between cases and patients with non-RMSF illnesses. Imaging studies reflected the variability and complexity of the illness but proved unhelpful in clarifying the early diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: RMSF epidemiology in this region appears different than RMSF elsewhere in the United States. No specific pattern of signs, symptoms, or laboratory findings occurred with enough frequency to consistently differentiate RMSF from other illnesses. Due to the nonspecific and variable nature of RMSF presentations, clinicians in this region should aggressively treat febrile illnesses and sepsis with doxycycline for suspected RMSF.


Assuntos
Doenças Endêmicas , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/epidemiologia , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Arizona/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/diagnóstico , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto Jovem
17.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(11): 1659-66, 2015 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25697742

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is a disease that now causes significant morbidity and mortality on several American Indian reservations in Arizona. Although the disease is treatable, reported RMSF case fatality rates from this region are high (7%) compared to the rest of the nation (<1%), suggesting a need to identify clinical points for intervention. METHODS: The first 205 cases from this region were reviewed and fatal RMSF cases were compared to nonfatal cases to determine clinical risk factors for fatal outcome. RESULTS: Doxycycline was initiated significantly later in fatal cases (median, day 7) than nonfatal cases (median, day 3), although both groups of case patients presented for care early (median, day 2). Multiple factors increased the risk of doxycycline delay and fatal outcome, such as early symptoms of nausea and diarrhea, history of alcoholism or chronic lung disease, and abnormal laboratory results such as elevated liver aminotransferases. Rash, history of tick bite, thrombocytopenia, and hyponatremia were often absent at initial presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier treatment with doxycycline can decrease morbidity and mortality from RMSF in this region. Recognition of risk factors associated with doxycycline delay and fatal outcome, such as early gastrointestinal symptoms and a history of alcoholism or chronic lung disease, may be useful in guiding early treatment decisions. Healthcare providers should have a low threshold for initiating doxycycline whenever treating febrile or potentially septic patients from tribal lands in Arizona, even if an alternative diagnosis seems more likely and classic findings of RMSF are absent.


Assuntos
Doenças Endêmicas , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/epidemiologia , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/patologia , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
18.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 92(2): 244-6, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25404074

RESUMO

Two national surveillance systems capturing reports of fatal Q fever were compared with obtained estimates of Q fever underreporting in the United States using capture-recapture methods. During 2000-2011, a total of 33 unique fatal Q fever cases were reported through case report forms submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and through U.S. death certificate data. A single case matched between both data sets, yielding an estimated 129 fatal cases (95% confidence interval [CI] = 62-1,250) during 2000-2011. Fatal cases of Q fever were underreported through case report forms by an estimated factor of 14 and through death certificates by an estimated factor of 5.2.


Assuntos
Febre Q/epidemiologia , Causas de Morte , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Controle de Formulários e Registros/métodos , Humanos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Febre Q/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
19.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 92(2): 247-55, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25404080

RESUMO

Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis historically associated with exposure to infected livestock. This study summarizes cases of Q fever, a notifiable disease in the United States, reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through two national surveillance systems with onset during 2000-2012. The overall incidence rate during this time was 0.38 cases per million persons per year. The reported case fatality rate was 2.0%, and the reported hospitalization rate was 62%. Most cases (61%) did not report exposure to cattle, goats, or sheep, suggesting that clinicians should consider Q fever even in the absence of livestock exposure. The prevalence of drinking raw milk among reported cases of Q fever (8.4%) was more than twice the national prevalence for the practice. Passive surveillance systems for Q fever are likely impacted by underreporting and underdiagnosis because of the nonspecific presentation of Q fever.


Assuntos
Febre Q/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Bovinos/microbiologia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Cabras/microbiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Leite/microbiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Prevalência , Febre Q/diagnóstico , Febre Q/etiologia , Febre Q/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Ovinos/microbiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Zoonoses/epidemiologia
20.
PLoS One ; 9(12): e112368, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25479289

RESUMO

Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) transmitted by the brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato) has emerged as a significant public health risk on American Indian reservations in eastern Arizona. During 2003-2012, more than 250 RMSF cases and 19 deaths were documented among Arizona's American Indian population. The high case fatality rate makes community-level interventions aimed at rapid and sustained reduction of ticks urgent. Beginning in 2012, a two year pilot integrated tick prevention campaign called the RMSF Rodeo was launched in a ∼ 600-home tribal community with high rates of RMSF. During year one, long-acting tick collars were placed on all dogs in the community, environmental acaricides were applied to yards monthly, and animal care practices such as spay and neuter and proper tethering procedures were encouraged. Tick levels, indicated by visible inspection of dogs, tick traps and homeowner reports were used to monitor tick presence and evaluate the efficacy of interventions throughout the project. By the end of year one, <1% of dogs in the RMSF Rodeo community had visible tick infestations five months after the project was started, compared to 64% of dogs in Non-Rodeo communities, and environmental tick levels were reduced below detectable levels. The second year of the project focused on use of the long-acting collar alone and achieved sustained tick control with fewer than 3% of dogs in the RMSF Rodeo community with visible tick infestations by the end of the second year. Homeowner reports of tick activity in the domestic and peridomestic setting showed similar decreases in tick activity compared to the non-project communities. Expansion of this successful project to other areas with Rhipicephalus-transmitted RMSF has the potential to reduce brown dog tick infestations and save human lives.


Assuntos
Rhipicephalus sanguineus/parasitologia , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/epidemiologia , Infestações por Carrapato/epidemiologia , Animais , Vetores Aracnídeos/patogenicidade , Arizona , Cães , Humanos , Indígenas Norte-Americanos , Características de Residência , Rhipicephalus sanguineus/genética , Rickettsia rickettsii/isolamento & purificação , Rickettsia rickettsii/patogenicidade , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/transmissão , Febre Maculosa das Montanhas Rochosas/virologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...