Negative emotion increases false memory for person/action conjunctions.

Two experiments demonstrate that eyewitnesses often falsely recognise an actor performing an action that had actually been performed by someone else, even if the action involves negative emotions and the actor in question had only appeared in emotionally neutral contexts. Participants viewed videos, each involving an actor performing a neutral (e.g. making oatmeal) or negatively valenced (e.g. killing a roach) action, and were asked to remember the events (Experiment 1) or to rate them for valence and arousal (Experiment 2). In both experiments, participants remembered negative actions better than neutral actions. Participants were also especially likely, however, to falsely recognise a different person performing a negative action. Experiment 2 revealed that this effect was modulated by the prior emotional contexts in which an actor had appeared. Participants were still just as likely, however, to falsely recognise an actor who had only appeared in neutral contexts now performing a negative action as they were to falsely recognise this actor performing a different neutral action. These results suggest that even individuals seen only in benign contexts can be falsely remembered as having participated in emotionally charged events (e.g. crimes).

Influences of executive and memory functioning on memory for the sources of actions.

This research provides evidence for similarities and differences between the results of traditional source memory paradigms and results from the Person-Action Conjunction (PAC) test. In the PAC test, participants view actions performed by different actors and are later tested on their memory for which actor performed each action. The PAC test can be construed as a source memory test, with actions serving as target information and actors representing the sources of those actions. Unlike traditional source memory tests, which involve a many-to-few relation of targets to sources, the PAC test involves a many-to-many relation, typically with equal numbers of actors and actions. To test whether the relation of targets to sources influences the cognitive mechanisms underlying memory for the sources of actions, young and older participants in two experiments (N = 217) took part in the PAC test, either in the context of many actors or just two actors. Participants also received Glisky and Kong's (2008) battery of tests of executive and memory functioning. Executive functioning predicted source memory performance in older adults tested in the context of just two actors, whereas memory functioning predicted young adult performance in this context. Moreover, memory functioning predicted the performance of both age groups when tested in the context of many actors, even after controlling for memory for those actors in isolation. Both young and older adults may thus rely on basic associative mechanisms to remember the sources of actions when each actor is only encountered once in the context of performing an individual action. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).