Elevation of C-reactive protein in adolescent bipolar disorder vs. anxiety disorders.

Bipolar disorder (BD) largely begins in adolescence, but diagnosis lags for years, causing significant morbidity and mortality, and demonstrating the need for better diagnostic tools. Suggesting an association between BD and immune activity, elevated levels of peripheral inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), have been found in adults with BD. As similar data are extremely limited in adolescents, this study examined CRP levels in adolescents with BD (n = 37) compared to those with anxiety disorders (ADs, n = 157) and healthy controls with no psychiatric diagnoses (HCs, n = 2760). CRP blood levels for patients aged 12-17 years were retrieved from a nationwide repository of deidentified clinical data. After excluding patients with inflammatory conditions, differences in CRP were examined using multivariate and weighted regressions (covariates: demographics and BMI). Mean CRP levels were significantly elevated in adolescents with BD relative to those with ADs and HCs. Mean CRP levels were lower in the ADs cohort versus HCs. Although CRP levels were significantly higher in males and younger patients, the significant between-cohort differences in CRP remained after controlling for multiple confounders. To our knowledge, our study is the first to compare CRP levels between adolescent BD, ADs, and HCs, comprising a novel and essential contribution. Our results suggest the presence of a unique immune process in adolescents with BD and indicate that CRP may represent a biomarker with a crucial role in the diagnostic assessment of adolescent BD.

Primary care pediatrician perceptions towards mental health within the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Mental health (MH) conditions are highly prevalent, yet only marginal portions of children receive adequate services. Access to specialized mental healthcare is limited and, consequently, pediatricians remain the source of management and care of children with MH disorders. Despite this, research suggests that pediatricians report lack of access to training and support regarding MH care of youth, leading to discomfort with managing the population they are asked to treat. An additional barrier to care that has less research is perceptions regarding MH disorders among pediatricians. This scoping review aims to describe the state of science regarding perceptions and possible stigma towards MH in pediatric primary care. METHODS: PsychInfo, PubMed Medline, Ovid Medline, CINAHL, and Embase were searched with terms related to stigma, pediatricians, and MH disorders. New research articles were included after review, which addressed stigma in pediatricians treating youth with MH disorders. RESULTS: Our initial search produced 457 titles, with 23 selected for full-text review, and 8 meeting inclusion criteria, N = 1571 pediatricians. CONCLUSIONS: While a limited number of studies focus on physician-based perceptions/stigma, and even less data on pediatrician stigma towards MH, more studies are needed to explore how this impacts patient care. IMPACT: In this scoping review, we sought to shed light on the limitations regarding MH care access, especially with the increasing need for care and not enough MH specialists, adding to an already tremendous burden pediatric primary care providers face daily. We also reviewed barriers to said care within pediatric primary care, including the potential for physician stigma towards MH diagnosis, treatment, and management. This review adds a concise summary of the current limited studies on stigma towards MH within primary care pediatricians and the importance of continued research into how perception and stigma affect patient care. This material is an original project and has not been previously published. This work is not submitted for publication or consideration elsewhere.

Understanding Chronic Aggression and Its Treatment in Children and Adolescents.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Youth aggression is common and has a significant burden on individuals, families, and society. However, its treatment is often a challenge for clinicians. Thus, this review will examine the current understanding of youth aggression, conceptualize aggression as a symptom rather than its own disorder, and provide an overview of treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Youth aggression is associated with complex genetic, neurobiological, and environmental risks. Prevention strategies are of the utmost importance for at-risk families and youth. Psychosocial interventions are the first line treatment. But if not fully effective, then pharmacologic interventions-including psychostimulants, alpha-2 agonists, atomoxetine, and risperidone-have shown benefits. Other medications, such as SSRIs, can be useful in certain scenarios. It is important to conceptualize youth aggression as being a trans-diagnostic symptom in psychopathology. Determining the underlying cause of aggression will help to guide treatment.