Validation of the Lithuanian Version of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Background and Objectives: The Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) is a short and simple tool to measure walking impairment for patients with peripheral arterial disease requiring no special equipment or trained staff. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the culturally adapted Lithuanian WIQ version in patients with intermittent claudication. Materials and Methods: In total, 40 patients with intermittent claudication and ankle-brachial index < 0.90 participated in this study. Reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaire were assessed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha (α), respectively. Validity was determined by correlations between the WIQ scores and a subjective test (Quality of Life 5 Dimension Questionnaire 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L)) and objective tests (6 min walk test (6MWT), treadmill test, and ankle-brachial index). Results: The test-retest reliability was assessed as excellent with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90. The values of Cronbach's alpha were 0.957 (I time) and 0.948 (II time) and indicated an excellent internal consistency. Statistically significant Spearman correlations were detected between the WIQ and walking distances on the 6MWT (rho 0.514, p < 0.001) and treadmill test (rho 0.515, p < 0.001). Higher WIQ scores were associated with longer walking distances and duration. Moderate negative and low negative correlations were found between the WIQ and EQ-5D-3L scores. Conclusions: The Lithuanian version of culturally adapted WIQ demonstrates reliability and validity for patients with intermittent claudication, supported by two different walking tests showing statistically significant moderate Spearman correlations.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameter versus Volume: A Systematic Review.

Recently, AAA volume measurement has been proposed as a potentially valuable surveillance method in situations when diameter measurement might fail. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the results of previous studies comparing AAA diameter and volume measurements. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases was performed to identify studies investigating the use of diameter and volume measurements in AAA diagnosis and prognosis in English, German, and Russian, published until December 2022. The manuscripts were reviewed by three researchers and scored on the quality of the research using MINORS criteria. RESULTS: After screening 752 manuscripts, 19 studies (n = 1690) were included. The majority (n = 17) of the manuscripts appeared to favor volume. It is, however, important to highlight the heterogeneity of methodologies and lack of standardized protocol for measuring both volume and diameter in the included studies, which hindered the interpretation of the results. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical relevance of abdominal aortic aneurysm volume measurement is still unclear, although studies show favorable and promising results for volumetric changes in AAA, especially in follow-up after EVAR.