Drainage of anorectal abscesses in the operating room is associated with a decreased risk of abscess recurrence and fistula formation.

BACKGROUND: Timely incision and drainage (I&D) is first line management for anorectal abscesses. We aimed to define current practices in anorectal abscess management and identify factors associated with abscess recurrence and fistula formation. METHODS: Index episodes of anorectal abscesses treated with I&D in 2014-2018 at a multi-hospital healthcare system were included. Association with one-year abscess recurrence or fistula formation was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard regression. Fistulae were captured only among patients without fistulae at the index operation. RESULTS: A total of 458 patients met study criteria. One-year rate of abscess recurrence or fistula formation was 20.3%. When compared to bedside procedures, drainage in the operating room was associated with a reduced risk of either recurrence or fistula formation (aHR 0.20 [95%CI 0.114-0.367]). CONCLUSIONS: Improved exposure and patient comfort in the operating room may allow more complete drainage contributing to decreased rates of abscess recurrence or fistula formation.

Readmission After Surgical Resection for Colon and Rectal Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, often requiring patients to undergo anatomy-altering surgical interventions leading to increased postoperative readmission. Hospital readmission rates have been correlated with increased mortality. Therefore, it is important to understand the association between 30-day readmission rates and mortality as well as the factors associated with increased readmission rates. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective review utilizing data from the National Cancer Database. Our primary outcomes of interest were 30- and 90-day mortality rates. Our primary independent variable of interest was 30-day readmission. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2016, 207 299 patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer and 754 895 for colon cancer. The readmission rates within 30 days of discharge were 5.4% and 5.5% for patients after surgery for rectal or colon cancer, respectively. 30-day readmission was not associated with 30-day mortality, but it was independently associated with increased 90-day mortality and inferior long-term survival for both cohorts (P = .001). Independent risk factors significantly associated with increased readmission included race, non-private insurance, and low income. CONCLUSION: This study provides a large, up-to-date, and comprehensive analysis of readmission rates for colon and rectal cancers. We demonstrate that socioeconomic factors are associated with increased 30-day readmission. 30-day readmission is also independently associated with increased 90-day mortality as well as lower overall survival rates. Our study supports the need for implementation of programs that support patients of lower socioeconomic status undergoing surgery to further decrease readmission rates and mortality.

Transanal excision with adjuvant therapy for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features offers equivalent survival to radical resection: A National Cancer Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines favor transabdominal radical resection (RR) over transanal local excision (TAX) followed by adjuvant therapy (TAXa) for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features. Comparison of oncologic outcomes between these approaches is limited, although the former is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. We hypothesize that such treatment strategies result in equivalent long-term survival. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Cancer Database (2010-2016) to identify patients with pT1N0 rectal adenocarcinoma with high-risk features who underwent TAX or RR for curative intent. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), evaluated with log-rank and Cox-proportional hazards testing. RESULTS: A total of 1159 patients (age 67.4 ± 12.9 years; 56.6% male; 83.3% White) met study criteria, of which 1009 (87.1%) underwent RR and 150 (12.9%) underwent TAXa. Patients undergoing TAXa had shorter lengths of stay (RR = 6.5 days, TAXa = 2.7 days, p < 0.001). The 5-year OS was equivalent between groups. TAX without adjuvant therapy was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.78, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to demonstrate equivalent 5-year OS between TAXa and RR for T1N0 rectal cancer with high-risk features. These findings may guide the development of prospective, randomized trials and influence changes in practice recommendations for early-stage rectal cancer.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Right Hemicolectomy for Non-metastatic Mucinous and Nonmucinous Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) represents a heterogenous group of neoplasms with distinct histologic features. The role and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in non-metastatic disease remain controversial. The aim of this study was to ascertain the role of AC in non-metastatic AA in a national cohort of patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients diagnosed with stage I-III mucinous and nonmucinous AA who underwent right hemicolectomy between 2006 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of AC on overall survival (OS) stratified by each pathologic stage. RESULTS: A total of 1433 mucinous and 1954 nonmucinous AA were identified; 578 (40%) and 722 (40%) received AC respectively. In both AC groups, there was a higher proportion of T4 disease, lymph node metastasis, pathologic stage III, and poorly/undifferentiated grade (all P<0.05). On unadjusted analysis, there was no significant association between AC and OS for stage I-III mucinous AA. For nonmucinous AA, AC significantly improved OS only for stage II and III disease. On adjusted analysis, AC was independently associated with an improved OS for stage III nonmucinous AA (HR: 0.61, 95%CI 0.45-0.84, P=0.002), while for mucinous AA, AC was associated with worse outcomes for stage I/II disease (HR: 1.4, 95%CI 1.02-1.91, P=0.038) and had no significant association with OS for stage III disease. CONCLUSION: This current analysis of a national cohort of patients suggests a beneficial role for AC in stage III nonmucinous AA and demonstrates no identifiable benefit for stage I-III mucinous AA.

Developing Opioid Prescription Guidelines After Anorectal Surgery: Do Patient-Reported Outcomes and Risk Factors Influence Consumption?

BACKGROUND: Opioids prescribed to address postoperative pain drive opioid-related deaths in the United States. Prescribing guidelines have been developed for many general surgical procedures, which have decreased opioid prescription and consumption. The literature on opioids after anorectal surgery is lacking. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed our data on opioid prescription and consumption to create opioid-prescribing guidelines for anorectal procedures. DESIGN: We designed a prospectively collected postoperative survey given to consecutive patients undergoing anorectal surgery by colorectal surgeons. SETTINGS: Patients had surgery at 2 academic, university-affiliated hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing anorectal surgery from May 3, 2018, to December 18, 2019, were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years of age, had a concurrent abdominopelvic surgery, consumed opioids in the week before their operation, or were without follow-up at 3 months postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was the number of opioid pills needed to fulfill consumption of 80% of patients. Secondary outcome measures were patient, operative, and postoperative factors associated with increasing pill consumption. RESULTS: Eighteen 5-mg oxycodone tablets were needed to fulfill the needs of 80% of patients. An overall median of 8 pills was consumed. Pill prescription was independently predictive of increased consumption. The only patient factor associated with increased consumption was race; no other patient or operative factors were predictive of consumption. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include its partially retrospective nature, use of self-reported data, and lack of racial diversity among our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Without any clinical factors predictive of increased consumption, prescription guidelines can be standardized to ≤18 5-mg oxycodone tablets across anorectal surgery patients. As prescription is correlated with consumption, further work is needed to determine whether lesser quantities of opioids prescribed offer similar postoperative pain relief for patients undergoing anorectal surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B821 .DESARROLLO DE PAUTAS PARA LA PRESCRIPCIÓN DE OPIOIDES DESPUÉS DE CIRUGÍA ANORRECTAL: ¿INFLUYEN EN EL CONSUMO LOS RESULTADOS INFORMADOS POR EL PACIENTE Y LOS FACTORES DE RIESGO? ANTECEDENTES: Los opioides recetados para tratar el dolor posoperatorio provocan muertes relacionadas con los opioides en los Estados Unidos. Se han desarrollado pautas de prescripción para muchos procedimientos quirúrgicos generales y estas han conducido a una disminución de la prescripción y el consumo de opioides. Hay una carencia de literatura sobre el uso de opioides después de cirugía anorrectal. OBJETIVO: Analizamos nuestros datos sobre prescripción y consumo de opioides para crear pautas de prescripción de opioides para procedimientos anorrectales. DISEO: Diseñamos una encuesta postoperatoria recopilada prospectivamente que se administró a pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cirugía anorrectal por cirujanos colorrectales. AJUSTES: Los pacientes fueron operados en dos hospitales académicos afiliados a la universidad. PACIENTES: Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes sometidos a cirugía anorrectal desde el 3/05/2018 hasta el 18/12/2019. Se excluyó a los pacientes que tenían menos de 18 años, a los que se sometieron a cirugía abdominopélvica concurrente, a los que consumieron opioides en la semana anterior a la operación, o si no tenían seguimiento a los 3 meses del postoperatorio. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE DESENLACE: El desenlace principal de este estudio fue el número de píldoras de opioides necesarias para satisfacer el consumo del 80% de los pacientes. Las medidas de desenlace secundarias fueron los factores del paciente, operatorios y posoperatorios asociados con el aumento del consumo de píldoras. RESULTADOS: Fueron necesarios dieciocho comprimidos de oxicodona de 5 mg para cubrir las necesidades del 80% de los pacientes. Se consumió una mediana general de 8 píldoras. La prescripción de la píldora fue un predictor independiente de un mayor consumo. El único factor del paciente asociado con un mayor consumo fue la raza; ningún otro paciente o factores operativos fueron predictivos del consumo. LIMITACIONES: Las limitaciones de este estudio incluyen su naturaleza parcialmente retrospectiva, el uso de datos autoinformados y la falta de diversidad racial entre nuestra cohorte. CONCLUSIONES: Sin ningún factor clínico que prediga un aumento del consumo, las pautas de prescripción se pueden estandarizar a dieciocho o menos comprimidos de oxicodona de 5 mg en pacientes sometidos a cirugía anorrectal. Como la prescripción se correlaciona con el consumo, se necesita más trabajo para determinar si cantidades menores de opioides prescritos ofrecen un alivio del dolor posoperatorio similar para los pacientes sometidos a cirugía anorrectal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B821 . (Traducción-Juan Carlos Reyes ).

Patient Factors Limit Colon Cancer Survival at Safety-Net Hospitals: A National Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Safety-net hospitals serve a vital role in society by providing care for vulnerable populations. Existing data regarding oncologic outcomes of patients with colon cancer treated at safety-net hospitals are limited and variable. The objective of this study was to delineate disparities in treatment and outcomes for patients with colon cancer treated at safety-net hospitals. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified 802,304 adult patients with colon adenocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database between 2004-2016. Patients were stratified according to safety-net burden of the treating hospital as previously described. Patient, tumor, facility, and treatment characteristics were compared between groups as were operative and short-term outcomes. Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized to compare overall survival between patients treated at high, medium, and low burden hospitals. RESULTS: Patients treated at safety-net hospitals were demographically distinct and presented with more advanced disease. They were also less likely to receive surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, negative resection margins, adequate lymphadenectomy, or a minimally invasive operative approach. On multivariate analysis adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, survival was inferior for patients at safety-net hospitals, even for those with stage 0 (in situ) disease. CONCLUSION: This analysis revealed inferior survival for patients with colon cancer treated at safety-net hospitals, including those without invasive cancer. These findings suggest that unmeasured population differences may confound analyses and affect survival more than provider or treatment disparities.

Time to Surgery and Colon Cancer Survival in the United States.

PURPOSE: Time to surgery (TTS) is of concern to patients diagnosed with cancer and their physicians. Controversy surrounds the impact of TTS on colon cancer survival. There are limited national data evaluating the association; thus, our aim was to estimate the overall survival (OS) impact from increasing TTS for patients with colon cancer. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we assessed OS as a function of time between diagnosis and surgery by evaluating intervals encompassing <7, 7 to 30, 31 to 60, 61 to 90, 91 to 120, and 121 to 180 days in length. All patients were diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon cancer and underwent surgery as initial treatment. Our main outcome was OS as a function of time between diagnosis and surgery, after adjusting for patient, demographic, and tumor-related factors using Cox regression models and propensity score-based weighting. RESULTS: A total of 514,103 patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2012 were included. Individuals having <7, 7 to 30, 31 to 60, 61 to 90, 91 to 120, and 121 to 180 days between diagnosis and surgery comprised 35.4%, 45%, 15.1%, 2.9%, 1%, and 0.6% of the patients, respectively. There was a steady increase in median TTS across the years. On multivariable analysis, TTS >30 days or within the first week independently increased mortality risk. There was a significant increase in mortality with TTS 31 to 60 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.13], 61 to 90 (HR 1.49), <7 (HR 1.56), 91 to 120 (HR 2.28), and 121 to 180 (HR 2.46) compared to surgery performed 7 to 30 days after diagnosis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TTS is independently associated with OS and this represents a public health issue that should be addressed at a national level. Although time is required for evaluation before surgery, efforts to reduce TTS should be pursued.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery Pathways and early urinary catheter removal on post-operative urinary retention.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after colorectal surgery. Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) typically include early catheter removal but may place patients at risk for POUR. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing colorectal surgery at a single institution between April 2014 and November 2017. Patients were stratified into non-ERP and ERP cohorts and post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 284 patients studied, ERP was applied to 161 (57%) while the remaining 123 (43%) recovered under standard care. Median duration of indwelling Foleys was 1 day for ERP and 2 days for non-ERP patients (p < 0.001). ERP patients experienced higher rates of straight catheterization (22% vs 12%,p = 0.036), Foley reinsertion (14% vs 7%,p = 0.07), and initiation of alpha antagonists (12% vs 5%,p = 0.04). Significant independent predictors of POUR were age (OR 1.03, p = 0.002), male gender (OR 2.79, p = 0.001), surgery duration (OR 1.27, p = 0.027), and ERP (OR 1.96, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: ERP following colorectal surgery that include routine early Foley catheter removal on post-operative day one is associated with increased rates of POUR; however, this did not lead to increased rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections during the index admission in the population studied.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing colorectal surgery within an institutional enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: comparison of two prophylactic antiemetic regimens.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) provide optimal perioperative care for surgical patients. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common after colorectal surgery (CRS). We aim to compare the efficacy of aprepitant to a cost-effective alternative, perphenazine, as components of triple antiemetic prophylaxis in ERP patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent ERP CRS at a single institution from July 2015 to July 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Only subjects who received aprepitant (Group 1) or perphenazine (Group 2) preoperatively for PONV prophylaxis were included. Patient characteristics, simplified Apfel PONV scores, perioperative medications, and PONV incidence were compared between the groups. PONV was defined as the need for rescue antiemetics on postoperative days (POD) 0-5. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-seven patients underwent CRS of which 498 met the inclusion criteria. Two hundred thirty-one (46.4%) received aprepitant and 267 (53.6%) received perphenazine. The incidence of early PONV (POD 0-1) was comparable between the two groups: 44.2% in Group 1 and 44.6% in Group 2 (P = 0.926). Late PONV (POD 2-5) occurred less often in Group 1 than Group 2, respectively (35.9% vs. 45.7%, P = 0.027). After matching the groups for preoperative, procedural, and anesthesia characteristics (164 pairs), no difference in early or late PONV could be demonstrated between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PONV remains high despite most patients receiving three prophylactic antiemetic medications. Perphenazine can be considered a cost-effective alternative to oral aprepitant for prophylaxis of PONV in patients undergoing CRS within an ERP.

Obesity Does Not Impact Perioperative or Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: While the prevalence of obesity in IBD patients is rapidly increasing, it is unclear if obesity impacts surgical outcomes in this population. We aim to investigate the effects of BMI on perioperative and postoperative outcomes in IBD patients by stratifying patients into BMI groups and comparing outcomes between these groups. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study where IBD patients who underwent intestinal surgeries between the years of 2000 to 2014 were identified. The patients were divided into groups based on BMI: underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI 25-29.9), and obese (BMI ≥30). Preoperative patient demographics, operative variables, and postoperative complications were collected and compared between BMI groups. RESULTS: A total of 391 surgeries were reviewed (34 underweight, 187 normal weight, 105 overweight, and 65 obese) from 325 patients. No differences were observed in preoperative patient demographics, type of IBD, preoperative steroid or biologic mediator use, or mean laboratory values. No differences were observed in percent operative procedures with anastomosis, surgeries converted to open, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, and median operative time. Thirty-day postoperative complication rates including total complications, wound infection, or anastomotic leak were similar between groups. There was a statistically significant increased postoperative bleeding risk (p = 0.029) in underweight patients. The relative percent for increased postoperative bleeding risk between BMI groups was as follows: 2.9% in underweight, zero in normal weight, 2.9% in overweight, and zero in obese. CONCLUSION: Obesity does not appear to impact intraoperative variables nor does obesity appear to worsen postoperative complication rates in IBD patients.

Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Local excision is an organ-preserving treatment alternative to transabdominal resection for patients with stage I rectal cancer. However, local excision alone is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and inferior survival compared with transabdominal rectal resection. We investigated the oncological and functional outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision for patients with stage T2N0 rectal cancer. METHODS: We did a multi-institutional, single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 trial of patients with clinically staged T2N0 distal rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy at 26 American College of Surgeons Oncology Group institutions. Patients with clinical T2N0 rectal adenocarcinoma staged by endorectal ultrasound or endorectal coil MRI, measuring less than 4 cm in greatest diameter, involving less than 40% of the circumference of the rectum, located within 8 cm of the anal verge, and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of at least 2 were included in the study. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of capecitabine (original dose 825 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and 22-35), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5), and radiation (5 days a week at 1·8 Gy per day for 5 weeks to a dose of 45 Gy, followed by a boost of 9 Gy, for a total dose of 54 Gy) followed by local excision. Because of adverse events during chemoradiotherapy, the dose of capecitabine was reduced to 725 mg/m(2) twice-daily, 5 days per week, for 5 weeks, and the boost of radiation was reduced to 5·4 Gy, for a total dose of 50·4 Gy. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival for all eligible patients (intention-to-treat population) and for patients who completed chemotherapy and radiation, and had ypT0, ypT1, or ypT2 tumours, and negative resection margins (per-protocol group). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00114231. FINDINGS: Between May 25, 2006, and Oct 22, 2009, 79 eligible patients were recruited to the trial and started neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Two patients had no surgery and one had a total mesorectal excision. Four additional patients completed protocol treatment, but one had a positive margin and three had ypT3 tumours. Thus, the per-protocol population consisted of 72 patients. Median follow-up was 56 months (IQR 46-63) for all patients. The estimated 3-year disease-free survival for the intention-to-treat group was 88·2% (95% CI 81·3-95·8), and for the per-protocol group was 86·9% (79·3-95·3). Of 79 eligible patients, 23 (29%) had grade 3 gastrointestinal adverse events, 12 (15%) had grade 3-4 pain, and 12 (15%) had grade 3-4 haematological adverse events during chemoradiation. Of the 77 patients who had surgery, six (8%) had grade 3 pain, three (4%) had grade 3-4 haemorrhage, and three (4%) had gastrointestinal adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Although the observed 3-year disease free survival was not as high as anticipated, our data suggest that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision might be considered as an organ-preserving alternative in carefully selected patients with clinically staged T2N0 tumours who refuse, or are not candidates for, transabdominal resection. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute and Sanofi-Aventis.

Colectomy for fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis: predictors of mortality.

The purpose of this study was to define clinical and radiographic variables associated with postoperative mortality after urgent colectomy for fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis. Data were obtained regarding patients undergoing colectomy for fulminant C. difficile colitis at two institutions (1997-2005). Univariate analysis of factors predicting 30-day mortality was performed using chi2 and Student's t tests. Multivariable logistic regression was done to include all variables whose P value was < 0.20. Clinical variables analyzed included: age, gender, recent operation, comorbidities, preoperative multisystem organ failure, vasopressors, symptom duration, time to surgery, serum albumin, change in serum albumin, serum creatinine, white blood cell count, and extent of colectomy. Computed tomography variables included: ascites, megacolon, and extent of colitis. Thirty-five patients (mean age 70 years, 46% male) underwent urgent colectomy for C. difficile colitis. The 30-day mortality rate was 45.7 per cent (16/35). The only clinical variable associated with mortality was preoperative multisystem organ failure (nonsurvivors 9/16 vs survivors: 4/19; P = 0.037). None of the three patients undergoing partial colectomy survived, although the difference in survival versus those undergoing subtotal colectomy was not significant. Patients with fulminant C. difficile colitis undergoing colectomy have a high mortality rate. Preoperative presence of multisystem organ failure was independently predictive of mortality.

Multidisciplinary treatment of synchronous primary rectal and prostate cancers.

BACKGROUND: A 58-year-old Caucasian man with a history of irritable bowel syndrome and occasional rectal bleeding presented with a 4-week history of progressive, bright red blood per rectum. A digital rectal examination revealed a 3 cm distal, midrectal mass. Laboratory tests showed an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen of 32 ng/ml but other physical and medical examinations were unremarkable. INVESTIGATIONS: Digital rectal examination, colonoscopy, rectal mass biopsy, endorectal ultrasound, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, CT scan and MRI. DIAGNOSIS: Clinical stage III (T3N1M0), moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the rectum and clinical stage II (T1cN0M0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate. MANAGEMENT: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, chemoradiation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy and surgery.

Efficacy of manual dissection of lymph nodes in colon cancer resections.

The adequacy of lymph node dissection of colonic resection specimens influences the clinical and pathologic staging, leading to important postsurgical treatment decisions. Although manual lymph node dissection is the current standard at most institutions, recent statistical studies indicate that all lymph nodes, including those measuring 1-2 mm, should be recovered to be assured of lymph node negative status. Thus, we tested the efficacy of gross dissection by submitting the entire residual mesenteric fat. We analyzed 15 randomly chosen colonic resections (2 pT1, 1 pT2, 11 pT3, 1 pT4). After standard gross dissection of lymph nodes and submission of colonic material for diagnosis, the entire remaining mesenteric material was dehydrated over several days by serial washing in alcohol and acetone. All of the mesenteric tissue was submitted for histology. The average number of nodes found by original gross inspection was 20.8, while the average number of additional nodes found after clearing was 68.6. In all, 83% of the additional nodes were 2.0 mm or less in size. There were seven pN0 cases; one was upstaged by additional findings that may have been artifactual. There were four pN1 cases; three were upstaged to pN2 after submission of the mesenteric material. All four pN2 tumors had additional metastases identified. In all, 75% of all positive nodes were under 2.0 mm in size. In this limited sample, standard gross dissection proved sufficient for most pN0 tumors to remain node negative. However, our findings within the pN1 group show that examination of all of the mesenteric material may be necessary to be assured of correct pN status.

Rectal ulceration as a result of prostatic brachytherapy: a new clinical problem: report of three cases.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer of males in the United States. One treatment modality for localized prostate cancer is brachytherapy, the implantation of radioactive seeds directly into the prostate. Although this is an effective treatment option, significant complications can result. More commonly these complications involve the genitourinary tract, but radiation proctitis is a well-recognized, less common complication. A specific complication of brachytherapy, the development of a rectal ulcer is not well recognized. The clinical course of this complication and results of treatment options are unknown. METHODS: Three cases of rectal ulceration as a consequence of prostatic brachyradiotherapy are presented, and the presumed course of disease and treatment options is discussed. RESULTS: Two patients were initially treated with local advancement flaps that both failed. These patients developed rectourethral fistulas. One patient was treated with diverting colostomy and suprapubic urinary diversion. The second underwent proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis. This also failed after multiple attempts to treat perianastomotic fistulas. The third patient was treated endoscopically for bleeding and has had no further interventions. CONCLUSION: In the small percentage of patients who develop rectal ulcerations from prostatic brachyradiotherapy, local medical or surgical treatments will often result in failure. They also may contribute to the eventual development of rectourethral fistulas, the likely natural progression of this disease. These fistulas should be treated with both urinary and fecal diversion. Earlier stages of ulceration may be treated with rectal resection and reconstruction, but selection criteria for these procedures have yet to be determined.