Limited sampling strategy to predict the area under the curve of tacrolimus in Mexican renal transplant pediatric patients receiving Prograf® or non-innovator formulations.

TDM of tacrolimus is usually performed with trough levels (C0h ). However, in pediatric patients, C0h may not be an adequate marker. The AUC is considered a more suitable indicator of drug exposure. As several blood samples are needed for the estimation of AUC, and LSS for predicting tacrolimus AUC and optimizing the dose adjustment have been proposed. Moreover, in emerging countries such as Mexico, non-innovator formulations, which bioequivalence has not been demonstrated, are frequently used. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop and validate a LSS to predict the tacrolimus AUC0-12h in Mexican pediatric kidney transplant recipients who received either Prograf® or non-innovator tacrolimus formulations. A total of 56 pharmacokinetic profiles were randomized into two groups: model development (n = 28) and model validation (n = 28). The limited sampling equations were obtained after a stepwise multiple regression using AUC as the dependent variable and tacrolimus blood concentrations, quantified by CMIA, at different time points as the independent variables. The final equation included observed concentrations at 1 hour (C1h ) and 4 hours (C4h ) after dose administration. The predictive performance of the model was adequate in terms of both, bias and precision. Results strongly suggest that the clinical use of this LSS could provide an ethical, cost-, and time-effective method in the TDM of tacrolimus in pediatric patients with kidney transplant. The model proved to be adequate with either Prograf® or non-innovator tacrolimus formulations of dubious bioequivalence.

Evidence against the participation of a pharmacokinetic interaction in the protective effect of single-dose curcumin against gastrointestinal damage induced by indomethacin in rats.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of a pharmacokinetic interaction in the protective effect of curcumin against the gastric damage induced by indomethacin administration as such or as its prodrug acemetacin. METHODS: Wistar rats orally received single dose of indomethacin (30 mg/kg) with and without curcumin (30 mg/kg); gastric injury was evaluated by determining the total damaged area. Additional groups of rats received an oral single dose of indomethacin (30 mg/kg) or its prodrug acemetacin (34.86 mg/kg) in the presence or absence of curcumin (30 mg/kg). Indomethacin and acemetacin concentrations in plasma from blood draws were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.Plasma concentration-against-time curves were constructed, and bioavailability parameters, maximal concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve to the last sampling time (AUC0-t) were estimated. RESULTS: Concomitant administration of indomethacin and curcumin resulted in a significantly reduced gastric damage compared to indomethacin alone. However, co-administration of curcumin did not produce any significant alteration in the bioavailability parameters of indomethacin and acemetacin after administration of either the active compound or the prodrug. CONCLUSION: Curcumin exhibits a protective effect against indomethacin-induced gastric damage, but does not produce a reduction of the bioavailability of this nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, indomethacin. Data thus suggest that a pharmacokinetic mechanism of action is not involved in curcumin gastroprotection.