Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 17(11 Pt 1): 1781-9, 2006 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17142708

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report on the feasibility and safety of retrieval of the Günther Tulip optional vena cava filter 30 days after initial implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2004 to September 2005, a single-center prospective study was undertaken in 35 patients who required inferior vena cava (IVC) filtration. All the Günther Tulip filters (GTFs) were implanted with the intention to be removed 30 days after initial implantation. A modified commercial dynamometer was used to measure the force required to remove the device. The degree of difficulty to remove the GTF was classified into four levels: N (no difficulty, force of 0-4.41 N), M (medium difficulty, force of 4.41-5.88 N), G (great difficulty, force of 5.88-9.8 N), and U (unable to remove). Clinical follow-up was performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after filter retrieval by review of medical records and imaging. RESULTS: Two of the 35 patients experienced extensive thrombosis in the IVC as revealed by abdominal computed tomography, and their filters were left in place on a permanent basis. One patient died of respiratory and cardiac failure during follow-up within the first 30 days after GTF insertion. Filter retrieval was attempted in the remaining 32 patients, and 31 of these attempts were successful (98%). The force necessary to disengage the GTF from the caval wall was less than 9.8 N (N, 79%; M, 13%; G, 6%). Attempts to remove the GTF failed in only one patient (2%). On follow-up times ranging between 14 and 640 days (mean, 342.5 d), no complications or cases of recurrent pulmonary embolism were observed in this patient population. CONCLUSION: The Günther Tulip optional IVC filter can be safely placed and retrieved percutaneously 30 days after initial implantation.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Desenho de Prótese , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Filtros de Veia Cava , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Prospectivos , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Radiografia Intervencionista , Segurança , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Semin Intervent Radiol ; 21(3): 205-16, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21331130

RESUMO

Up to 85% of patients who present with colonic obstruction have a colorectal cancer. Between 7% and 29% of these patients present with total or partial intestinal obstruction. Only 20% of these patients presenting with acute colonic obstruction due to malignancy survive 5 years. Emergent surgical intervention in patients with colonic obstruction is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Only 40% of patients with obstructive carcinoma of the left colon can be treated with surgical resection without the need for a colostomy. The use of a temporary or permanent colostomy has a significant impact on quality of life. The decompressive effect seen with colonic stenting is a durable, simple, and effective palliative treatment of patients with advanced disease. Stent deployment provides an effective solution to acute colonic obstruction and allows surgical treatment of the patient in an elective and more favorable condition. In addition, colonic stenting reduces costs and avoids the need for a colostomy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...