Sequential ADP-stimulated light transmission and multiple electrode aggregometry in patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel after non ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Fast platelet function tests can identify weak clopidogrel responders, but data on variability over time in clopidogrel responsiveness in several clinical settings are lacking. We wanted to explore long-term variability of multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) measurements and the agreement between MEA and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. METHODS: Parallel MEA and LTA were performed at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks in 31 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention after NSTEMI. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) concentrations 2 µM, 6.5 µM and 10 µM were used. Parallel testings in both arterial and venous blood were performed at baseline. MEA and LTA cut-off levels were applied to discriminate aggregation values suggesting presence or absence of high platelet reactivity (HPR). RESULTS: Arterial and venous MEA and LTA aggregation were similar. Within-subject variability in both MEA and LTA aggregation throughout the study was moderate. According to MEA, eight patients had HPR at baseline (MEA aggregation > 47 U). Defining > 47% as the LTA aggregation HPR cut-off level, the same number of patients (eight) had HPR according to LTA. Of the 93 MEA/LTA observations 81 (87.1%) gave the same HPR classification. MEA vs. LTA agreement at baseline was slightly inferior to that obtained after 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: MEA and LTA aggregation in arterial and venous blood seem similar. Within-subject variability over time was moderate, and the agreement between LTA and MEA was good, and stable in most patients.

Variability in aggregometry response before and after initiation of clopidogrel therapy.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of clopidogrel therapy by in vitro methods has limitations which may be of clinical importance. We wanted to explore the variability in aggregometry response in aspirin sensitive patients before and after initiation of clopidogrel therapy. METHODS: ADP 9.37 microM, AA 1.2mM and TRAP 25 mM stimulated light transmissions aggregometry (LTA) were performed twice before (Exams 1 and 2; 3 weeks apart)-and within one year after-initiation of clopidogrel therapy (Exam 3) in 79 patients treated with PCI. Repeated ADP aggregometry was also performed in 16 healthy volunteers in order to estimate LTA measurement error. RESULT: Inter-individual differences in ADP aggregation e.g. at Exam 1 were substantial (range 17-77%, SD 15.8%). Intra-individual changes between Exams 1 and 2 were significant (-27 to +36%, SD 14.6%, p<0.05). Inter-individual differences at Exam 3 (on clopidogrel treatment) were larger than expected from Exams 1 and 2 (p<0.01). AA aggregation was the same before and during clopidogrel treatment. In controls, inter-individual differences were smaller at ADP 10 than at ADP 5 microM. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-individual differences in ADP aggregation were significant both before and during clopidogrel therapy, and there were significant intra-individual variations over time. Therefore, prediction of aggregometry response before or during clopidogrel therapy based on single tests may be unreliable. Inter-individual differences in healthy controls are smaller at high concentrations of ADP, and comparisons of aggregometry response should be performed with caution unless ADP concentrations are standardized.