Measurement of Sarcopenia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients and Its Association With Frailty.

In head and neck cancer (HNC) there is a need for more personalized treatment based on risk assessment for treatment related adverse events (i.e. toxicities and complications), expected survival and quality of life. Sarcopenia, defined as a condition characterized by loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, can predict adverse outcomes in HNC patients. A review of the literature on the measurement of sarcopenia in head and neck cancer patients and its association with frailty was performed. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measurement only is often used to determine if sarcopenia is present or not. SMM is most often assessed by measuring skeletal muscle cross-sectional area on CT or MRI at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. As abdominal scans are not always available in HNC patients, measurement of SMM at the third cervical vertebra has been developed and is frequently used. Frailty is often defined as an age-related cumulative decline across multiple physiologic systems, with impaired homeostatic reserve and a reduced capacity of the organism to withstand stress, leading to increased risk of adverse health outcomes. There is no international standard measure of frailty and there are multiple measures of frailty. Both sarcopenia and frailty can predict adverse outcomes and can be used to identify vulnerable patients, select treatment options, adjust treatments, improve patient counselling, improve preoperative nutritional status and anticipate early on complications, length of hospital stay and discharge. Depending on the definitions used for sarcopenia and frailty, there is more or less overlap between both conditions. However, it has yet to be determined if sarcopenia and frailty can be used interchangeably or that they have additional value and should be used in combination to optimize individualized treatment in HNC patients.

Feasibility of Photo-Optical Transcutaneous Oxygen Tension Measurement During Revascularization of the Lower Extremity.

OBJECTIVES: A novel approach in the evaluation of peripheral arterial disease is the photo-optical oxygen tension measurement (pTCpO2). This modality is suggested to be more practical in use in comparison to standard electro-chemical oxygen tension measurement. Hence, pTCpO2 might be of added value to evaluate revascularization of the lower extremities peri-procedural. We conducted a preliminary feasibility study to analyze the potential of pTCpO2 during revascularization. METHODS: Ten patients scheduled for revascularization of the lower extremities were enrolled. pTCpO2 values of the affected lower extremity were measured pre-operatively, during revascularization and after revascularization. Results were compared to the pre- and postoperative ankle-brachial index (ABI) and to perioperative angiography. Primary endpoint was the feasibility of perioperative pTCpO2 measurement. Secondary endpoints were concordance between pTCpO2, ABI, angiography and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Two out of twelve measurements were unsuccessful. Eight out of ten patients experienced significant clinical improvement and pTCpO2 increase. Two patients that did not experience clinical improvement corresponded with no changes in intraoperative angiography and without increase in ABI or pTCpO2. A significant and strong correlation was found between prior and after revascularization ABI and pTCpO2 measurements (r = 0.82 P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Photo-optical transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement may serve as an intraoperative tool to evaluate the success of revascularization. pTCpO2 could be an alternative for the ABI to determine the success of lower extremity revascularization.

Sarcopenia measured with handgrip strength and skeletal muscle mass to assess frailty in older patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) have a risk of sarcopenia which is associated with adverse health outcomes. Frailty is also associated with adverse outcomes and is diagnosed by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Because a CGA is time-consuming and not all patients benefit from it, frailty screening questionnaires are used to select patients for CGA. Sarcopenia measurement may be a biomarker for frailty. Our objective was to examine the association between sarcopenia and a frailty screening questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, 150 patients (≥ 60-years old) with HNC were reviewed. Sarcopenia was defined as the combination of reduced handgrip strength and loss of skeletal muscle mass, calculated as skeletal muscle index (SMI), according to the EWGSOP-criteria. Frailty screening was performed using the Geriatrics 8 (G8) questionnaire. RESULTS: The 150 patients included 101 men and 49 women. Frail patients were more likely to be sarcopenic at diagnosis. G8 frailty score showed a significant though weak correlation with SMI. Univariate regression analysis with frailty as a dependent variable distinguished comorbidity score, handgrip strength, SMI, and sarcopenia as significant. These variables were subjected to a multivariate analysis in which comorbidity score and SMI remained significant. CONCLUSION: There is an association between sarcopenia and the G8 frailty screening questionnaire. Therefore, sarcopenia measurement could be interchangeable with the G8 frailty screening questionnaire. Further research should compare the gold standard for frailty, i.e. CGA, with sarcopenia.