Three Dimensional Printing as a Tool For Anatomical Training in Lung Surgery.

Objective: Pulmonary anatomy is challenging, due to the high variability and its three-dimensional (3D) shape. While demands in thoracic oncologic surgery are increasing, the transition from open to thoracoscopic surgery is hampering anatomical understanding. This study analyzed the value of a 3D printed lung model in understanding and teaching anatomy. Methods: A 3D pulmonary model was created and tested among different levels of proficiency: 10 experienced surgeons, 10 fellow surgeons and 10 junior residents. They were tested in interpretation of anatomy based on thoracic CT-scans, either using the 3D model or a 2D anatomical atlas. Accuracy of the given answers, time to complete the task and the self-reported level of certainty were scored in each group. Results: In the experienced surgeons group there was no difference in between the 2D-model or 3D-model with a high rate of correct answers in both groups, and no differences in time or certainty. Fellow surgeons highly benefitted from the 3D-model with an improved accuracy from 26.6% to 70.0% (p = 0.001). Time to complete the task was shorter (207 versus 122 s, p < 0.0001) and participants were more secure (median of 4 versus 3, p = 0.007). For junior residents time to complete the task was shorter, the level of certainty was higher, but there was no improvement in accuracy. Conclusions: 3D printing may benefit in understanding anatomical relations in the complex anatomy of the bronchiopulmonary tree, especially for surgeons in training and could benefit in teaching anatomy. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01807-x.

Clinical Response to Procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Delphi Consensus Study.

OBJECTIVE: No dedicated studies have been performed on the optimal management of patients with an acute stroke related to carotid intervention nor is there a solid recommendation given in the European Society for Vascular Surgery guideline. By implementation of an international expert Delphi panel, this study aimed to obtain expert consensus on the optimal management of in hospital stroke occurring during or following CEA and to provide a practical treatment decision tree. METHODS: A four round Delphi consensus study was performed including 31 experts. The aim of the first round was to investigate whether the conceptual model indicating the traditional division between intra- and post-procedural stroke in six phases was appropriate, and to identify relevant clinical responses during these six phases. In rounds 2, 3, and 4, the aim was to obtain consensus on the optimal response to stroke in each predefined setting. Consensus was reached in rounds 1, 3, and 4 when ≥ 70% of experts agreed on the preferred clinical response and in round 2 based on a Likert scale when a median of 7 - 9 (most adequate response) was given, IQR ≤ 2. RESULTS: The experts agreed (> 80%) on the use of the conceptual model. Stroke laterality and type of anaesthesia were included in the treatment algorithm. Consensus was reached in 17 of 21 scenarios (> 80%). Perform diagnostics first for a contralateral stroke in any phase, and for an ipsilateral stroke during cross clamping, or apparent stroke after leaving the operation room. For an ipsilateral stroke during the wake up phase, no formal consensus was achieved, but 65% of the experts would perform diagnostics first. A CT brain combined with a CTA or duplex ultrasound of the carotid arteries should be performed. For an ipsilateral intra-operative stroke after flow restoration, the carotid artery should be re-explored immediately (75%). CONCLUSION: In patients having a stroke following carotid endarterectomy, expedited diagnostics should be performed initially in most phases. In patients who experience an ipsilateral intra-operative stroke following carotid clamp release, immediate re-exploration of the index carotid artery is recommended.

[A boy with an abnormal hallux]. / Een jongen met een afwijkende grote teen.

An eleven-year-old boy was seen by the general practioner due to a painfull hallux. The diagnosis unguis incarnatus was made. Therefore, a partial nail extraction was performed. Unfortunately, the patient still had complaints of a painful hallux and was forwarded to the surgical outpatient clinic. We saw a round, hard and benign tumor on the lateral side of the nail (picture 1). We performed a partial nail extraction as well. Due to persistence complaints and the abnormal course and X-ray was performed. On the X-ray an exostosis was seen (picture 2). This confirmed the diagnosis: subungual exostosis. It is a rare clinical manifestation and has a long delay up until diagnosis. It is a benign bone tumor and often seen on the hallux. A radical excision must be performed.

Long-term Outcome of Axillo-axillary Bypass in Patients with Subclavian or Innominate Artery Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Subclavian or innominate artery stenosis (SAS) may cause upper extremity and cerebral ischemia. In patients with symptomatic subclavian or innominate artery stenosis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is the treatment of first choice. When percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is technically restricted or unsuccessful, an extrathoracic bypass grafting, such as an axillo-axillary bypass can be considered. The patency rate of axillo-axillary bypass is often questioned. The aim of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of patients undergoing axillo-axillary bypass for subclavian or innominate artery stenosis (SAS) and to provide a literature overview. METHODS: In this single-center study, data from patients who underwent axillo-axillary bypass for symptomatic SAS between 2002 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Bypass material was Dacron® (54%) or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (46%). Primary outcome was graft patency and secondary outcome was the occurrence of mortality and stroke. In addition, a systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases including all studies describing patency of axillo-axillary bypass. RESULTS: In total, 28 axillo-axillary bypasses had been performed. Cumulative primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates at one year were 89%, 93%, and 96%, respectively. Cumulative primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates at five years were 76%, 84%, and 87%, respectively. The primary-assisted patency rates at five years for Dacron® and PTFE were 93% and 73%, respectively. A total of four primary axillo-axillary bypass occlusions occurred (14%), with a mean of 12 months (range, 0.4-25) after operation. The 30-day mortality was 7%; one patient died after a stroke and one died of a myocardial infarction. At the first postoperative follow-up control, 22 of the 26 remaining patients (85%) had relief of symptoms. The literature search included 7 studies and described a one-year primary patency range of 93-100% (n = 137) and early postoperative adverse events included death (range, 0-13%) and stroke (range, 0-5%). CONCLUSIONS: Patency rates of axillo-axillary bypasses for patients with a symptomatic SAS are good. However, the procedural complication rate in this series is high and attention should be paid to intervention indication.

Reticulated Platelets as Predictor of Myocardial Injury and 30 Day Mortality After Non-cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: A pre-operative marker for identification of patients at risk of peri-operative adverse events and 30 day mortality might be the percentage of young, reticulated platelets (pRP). This study aimed to determine the predictive value of pre-operative pRP on post-operative myocardial injury (PMI) and 30 day mortality, in patients aged ≥ 60 years undergoing moderate to high risk non-cardiac surgery. METHODS: The incidence of PMI (troponin I > 0.06 µg/L) and 30 day mortality was compared for patients with normal and high pRP (≥2.82%) obtained from The Utrecht Patient Orientated Database. The predictive pRP value was assessed using logistic regression. A prediction model for PMI or 30 day mortality with known risk factors was compared with a model including increased pRP using the area under the receiving operator characteristics curve (AUROC). RESULTS: In total, 26.5% (607/2289) patients showed pre-operative increased pRP. Increased pRP was associated with more PMI and 30 day mortality compared with normal pRP (36.1% vs. 28.3%, p < .001 and 8.6% vs. 3.6%, p < .001). The median pRP was higher in patients suffering PMI and 30 day mortality compared with not (2.21 [IQR: 1.57-3.11] vs. 2.07 [IQR: 1.52-1.78], p = .002, and 2.63 [IQR: 1.76-4.15] vs. 2.09 [IQR: 1.52-3.98], p < .001). pRP was independently related to PMI (OR: 1.28 [95% CI: 1.04-1.59], p = .02) and 30 day mortality (OR: 2.35 [95% CI: 1.56-3.55], p < .001). Adding increased pRP to the predictive model of PMI or 30 day mortality did not increase the AUROC 0.71 vs. 0.72, and 0.80 vs. 0.81. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, increased pre-operative pRP is related to 30 day mortality and PMI.

Factors Associated with Hospital Dependent Delay to Carotid Endarterectomy in the Dutch Audit for Carotid Interventions.

OBJECTIVES: As the risk of a recurrent neurological event in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis requiring carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is highest in the early phase after the first neurological event, guidelines recommend operating on these patients as soon as possible or at least within 14 days of their initial event. However, in real world practice this is often not met. The aim of this study is to identify factors that cause hospital dependent delay to CEA. METHODS: All consecutive patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing CEA registered in the mandatory Dutch Audit for Carotid Interventions from January 2014 up to and including December 2017 were included in the current analysis. Univariable followed by multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with hospital dependent waiting time, defined as time from the first consultation at any hospital to CEA of more than 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 8620 patients were included. The median time to CEA was 11 days (IQR 8-14). Seventy-eight per cent of patients underwent CEA within 14 days of first hospital consultation. Factors associated with a hospital dependent waiting time longer than 14 days were age (OR 0.99 per year, 95% CI 0.98-0.99), any previous CEA (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.32-2.09), ocular symptoms as index event (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.50), and indirect referral (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.34-1.73). Hospital surgical volume was not identified as a factor for delay, except for the delay of indirectly referred patients where high volume hospitals reported the shortest delay. CONCLUSION: This cohort derived from a validated nationwide prospective audit identified younger age, previous CEA, ocular symptoms, and indirect referral as hospital dependent factors for delay. High volume hospitals had a similar hospital dependent waiting time to middle and low volume hospitals. However, high volume hospitals had more indirect referrals, implying that their logistics are more efficiently organised.

Editor's Choice - Predictors of New Ischaemic Brain Lesions on Diffusion Weighted Imaging After Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Peri-procedural ischaemic brain lesions on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) have been related to a higher chance of recurrent cerebrovascular events. This systematic review provides an overview of patient characteristics associated with increased risk of new DWI lesions. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched (update November 2018) for studies reporting post-procedural DWI lesions after CEA or CAS. Data derived from both procedures were analysed separately. Studies reporting predictive features that were present prior to intervention were assigned to 10 categories: age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, symptomatology, plaque vulnerability, atherosclerotic burden, cerebrovascular haemodynamics, carotid/arch anatomy, inflammatory markers, and markers of coagulation. A semi-quantitative analysis was performed by plotting studies that found an association between the investigated features and DWI lesions against those that did not find an association. RESULTS: Forty-six studies (5018 patients) were included: 10 reported only CEA, 33 CAS, and three both interventions. 68.0% of 1873 CEA patients and 55.9% of 3145 CAS patients were symptomatic. The weighted prevalence of DWI lesions was 18.1% (95% CI 14.0-22.7%) in CEA patients compared with 40.5% (95% CI 35.4-45.7%) in CAS patients. Studies reporting on CEA patients predominantly found an increased risk in symptomatic patients (two of seven studies, including 848/1661 patients), those with impaired haemodynamics (five of five studies), and increased inflammatory markers (two of three studies). Studies reporting on CAS patients often found a positive association with age (10/26 studies), high plaque vulnerability (25/34 studies), or complex carotid/arch anatomy (three out of five studies). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing CEA, symptomatic status, impeded cerebral haemodynamics, and increased inflammatory markers are associated with increased susceptibility to peri-operative DWI lesions. In CAS patients, higher age, plaque vulnerability and complex carotid/aortic arch anatomy were identified as risk factors. These clinical predictors may assist with decision making on patient selection for medical treatment, CEA or CAS.

A meta-analysis of the effect of stent design on clinical and radiologic outcomes of carotid artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE: Procedural characteristics, including stent design, may influence the outcome of carotid artery stenting (CAS). A thorough comparison of the effect of stent design on outcome of CAS is thus warranted to allow for optimal evidence-based clinical decision making. This study sought to evaluate the effect of stent design on clinical and radiologic outcomes of CAS. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases in May 2018. Included were articles reporting on the occurrence of clinical short- and intermediate-term major adverse events (MAEs; any stroke or death) or radiologic adverse events (new ischemic lesions on postprocedural magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging [MR-DWI], restenosis, or stent fracture) in different stent designs used to treat carotid artery stenosis. Random effects models were used to calculate combined overall effect sizes. Metaregression was performed to identify the effect of specific stents on MAE rates. RESULTS: From 2654 unique identified articles, two randomized, controlled trials and 66 cohort studies were eligible for analysis (including 46,728 procedures). Short-term clinical MAE rates were similar for patients treated with open cell vs closed cell or hybrid stents. Use of an Acculink stent was associated with a higher risk of short-term MAE compared with a Wallstent (risk ratio [RR], 1.51; P = .03), as was true for use of Precise stent vs Xact stent (RR, 1.55; P < .001). Intermediate-term clinical MAE rates were similar for open vs closed cell stents. Use of open cell stents predisposed to a 25% higher chance (RR, 1.25; P = .03) of developing postprocedural new ischemic lesions on MR-DWI. No differences were observed in the incidence of restenosis, stent fracture, or intraprocedural hemodynamic depression with respect to different stent design. CONCLUSIONS: Stent design is not associated with short- or intermediate-term clinical MAE rates in patients undergoing CAS. Furthermore, the division in open and closed cell stent design might conceal true differences in single stent efficacy. Nevertheless, open cell stenting resulted in a significantly higher number of subclinical postprocedural new ischemic lesions detected on MR-DWI compared with closed cell stenting. An individualized patient data meta-analysis, including future studies with prospective homogenous study design, is required to adequately correct for known risk factors and to provide definite conclusions with respect to carotid stent design for specific subgroups.

Long-Term Outcome of Symptomatic Patients Undergoing Hybrid Revascularisation for Extracranial Carotid Artery Tandem Stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: Carotid tandem lesions are a multilevel significant (>50%) atherosclerotic disease involving both the internal carotid artery (ICA) and either the ipsilateral common carotid artery (CCA) or the innominate artery (IA). These lesions may be challenging to treat. Current guidelines offer no definitive recommendation on the optimal treatment algorithm. The aim of this analysis was to assess the long-term outcome of patients undergoing surgical revascularisation for tandem lesions. METHODS: In two centres, consecutive patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis between 2003 and 2017 were screened retrospectively for the presence of a carotid artery tandem lesion. All eligible patients were treated by a hybrid approach, consisting of retrograde stenting of the proximal CCA or IA followed by CEA. All patients had a yearly clinical check up including duplex ultrasound. The primary outcome was occurrence of any stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were any stroke, death, MI, or TIA and occurrence of restenosis ≥50% during follow up. RESULTS: Sixteen of 2368 symptomatic patients were included. Besides a high grade ICA stenosis, patients had a significant ipsilateral stenosis of the CCA (n = 13) or IA (n = 3). Within 30 days there were no deaths, strokes, or TIAs. Two patients had a clinical MI. During a median follow up of 73 (interquartile range 22-85) months, three patients died. One patient developed a symptomatic restenosis of the ICA (ipsilateral TIA). Two patients (without restenosis) developed an ipsilateral stroke and a MI. CONCLUSIONS: In this small case series, hybrid revascularisation of carotid tandem lesions in symptomatic patients seems feasible and safe. Long-term data show a relatively high number of any adverse events. These surgical outcomes need to be offset against the natural course in patients with a symptomatic carotid tandem lesion.

[When is carotid endarterectomy actually indicated for stenosis?] / Wie moet er eigenlijk nog aan vernauwing in de A. carotis geopereerd worden?

Criteria for carotid endarterectomy are based on the results of clinical trials that were conducted more than two decades ago. In the meantime medical treatment has improved, and surgery can be performed more safely. As such, it is currently unknown which patients should be recommended to undergo carotid surgery. The aim of the currently running European Carotid Surgery Trial 2 is to find better answers to this dilemma.