Effect of brivaracetam on cardiac repolarisation--a thorough QT study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on cardiac repolarisation of the investigational synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligand brivaracetam. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects received double-blind, multiple bid doses of placebo (n = 53), brivaracetam 75 mg (n = 39) or brivaracetam 400 mg (n = 40), or open-label single-dose moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control, n = 52). Continuous 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at baseline and after last dosing, using a Mortara Holter device. Plasma samples were obtained before and up to 12 h after last dosing for drug determination. Triplicate ECGs were extracted before each sample, and read centrally in a blinded manner. QT was corrected using a centre- and gender-specific correction (QTc(SS) ). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the largest time-matched mean difference of QTc(SS) change from baseline between drug and placebo (maximum DeltaDeltaQTc(SS)). The same approach was adopted using the Fridericia's correction (QTc(F)). The relationships between DeltaQTc(SS) and plasma concentration of brivaracetam and moxifloxacin were fitted to a straight line using linear least-squares regression. RESULTS: Mean maximum DeltaDeltaQTc(SS) for brivaracetam 75 and 400 mg bid, and moxifloxacin 400 mg was 0.2 ms, -1.1 ms and 12.4 ms, respectively. The one-sided 95% upper limit for 75 mg and 400 mg brivaracetam was 4.3 ms and 3.0 ms, respectively; the one-sided 95% lower limit for moxifloxacin was 8.6 ms. After brivaracetam no QTc(SS) intervals > 480 ms or changes from baseline of > 60 ms were observed. DeltaQTc(SS) did not increase with plasma concentration of brivaracetam, whereas there was a statistically significant rise with increasing moxifloxacin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The study was found to be valid in terms of assay sensitivity and the results demonstrated the absence of effects of brivaracetam on cardiac repolarisation. These results suggest that no intensive cardiac monitoring is required during the subsequent stages of brivaracetam development.

A double-blind crossover comparison study of the safety and efficacy of mebeverine with mebeverine sustained release in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.

The safety and efficacy of the sustained release (SR) mebeverine capsule was compared to the standard plain mebeverine capsule in the treatment of 60 patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome. Patients, with a score of at least 44 on the Kruis scale, were randomized into a two-period crossover trial. Each treatment period lasted for 6 weeks during which the patients took mebeverine plain 135 mg, two capsules t.i.d., or mebeverine sustained release 200 mg (SR), two capsules b.i.d. After 6 weeks of each treatment, both treatments were regarded 'effective' or 'very effective' by the patient as well as the investigator in more than 80% of the cases. After 3 weeks of the first treatment, the disease score was rated light in 73% of the patients with both medications. After 6 weeks, nine patients (33%) were symptom-free with mebeverine plain, and five (18%) with mebeverine SR. During the second treatment period the number of symptom-free cases reached about 40% with both formulations. Considering the clinical general improvement, more than 70% of all patients had improved after 3 weeks of the first treatment. An additional improvement was reported in 13 patients with mebeverine plain and in 10 patients with mebeverine SR after the next 3 weeks. Abdominal pain was still present in more than 50% of patients but with lower intensity compared with baseline values. Mean scores of efficacy were very similar for both treatments after 3 and 6 weeks (2.0 for mebeverine plain vs. 1.9 for mebeverine SR). The statistical comparison of all scores between the two formulations did not show a significant difference at any time. Very few adverse events were noted and a causal relationship with the study medications was judged as improbable or definitely unrelated. Compliance was close to 100% for most of the patients. The results of the present study indicate that the mebeverine SR capsule provides equivalent efficacy and tolerance to mebeverine plain in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), while reducing the number of daily doses from three to two.