Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Preprint em Inglês | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-21262002

RESUMO

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had substantial impacts on lives across the globe. Job losses have been widespread, and individuals have experienced significant restrictions on their usual activities, including extended isolation from family and friends. While studies suggest population mental health worsened from before the pandemic, not all individuals appear to have experienced poorer mental health. This raises the question of how people managed to cope during the pandemic. MethodsTo understand the coping strategies individuals employed during the COVID-19 pandemic, we used structural topic modelling, a text mining technique, to extract themes from free-text data on coping from over 11,000 UK adults, collected between 14 October and 26 November 2020. ResultsWe identified 16 topics. The most discussed coping strategy was thinking positively and involved themes of gratefulness and positivity. Other strategies included engaging in activities and hobbies (such as doing DIY, exercising, walking and spending time in nature), keeping routines, and focusing on one day at a time. Some participants reported more avoidant coping strategies, such as drinking alcohol and binge eating. Coping strategies varied by respondent characteristics including age, personality traits and sociodemographic characteristics and some coping strategies, such as engaging in creative activities, were associated with more positive lockdown experiences. ConclusionA variety of coping strategies were employed by individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The coping strategy an individual adopted was related to their overall lockdown experiences. This may be useful for helping individuals prepare for future lockdowns or other events resulting in self-isolation. CorrectionDue to an error in the analytical syntax, in an earlier version of this manuscript (posted August 13, 2021), topic labels in Figure 2 were mixed up. This - and the resulting discussion - have now been corrected. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=140 SRC="FIGDIR/small/21262002v2_fig2.gif" ALT="Figure 2"> View larger version (52K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@62f742org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15748b9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1678a2borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a04c58_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 2:C_FLOATNO Association between document topic proportion and participants age (+ 95% confidence intervals). Derived from OLS regression models including adjustment for gender, ethnicity, age, education level, living arrangement, psychiatric diagnosis, long-term physical health conditions, self-isolation status, Big-5 personality traits and keyworker status. C_FIG

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...