Patient status and time to intubation in the assessment of prehospital intubation performance.

UNLABELLED: Assessment of paramedic endotracheal intubation (ETI) performance often does not account for varied clinical conditions or the time required to complete the procedure. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the utility of patient status and time to intubation (TTI) for evaluating prehospital ETI performance. METHODS: Paramedic charts were reviewed for the period January-December 1998. Patient clinical status was defined as cardiac arrest (absence of perfusing rhythm) or non-cardiac arrest (presence of perfusing rhythm). Method, route, and success of ETI were noted. The TTI was determined as the elapsed time from on-scene arrival to securing of the endotracheal tube. Time elapsed from on-scene arrival to emergency department arrival was noted for instances of failed ETI. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimator). RESULTS: Computer records were available for 26,026 patient contacts. Of 893 documented ETI attempts, 771 (86%) were successful. The ETI success rate was significantly higher (p<0.001) for cardiac arrests (551 of 591, 93.2%) than for non-cardiac arrests (220 of 302, 72.9%). Median TTIs were 5 minutes (95% CI: 5, 5) for cardiac arrests and 17 minutes (95% CI: 14, 20) for non-cardiac arrests; this difference was significant (p<0.001). For non-cardiac arrests, ETI success was significantly (p = 0.002) higher for orotracheal intubation (OTI) (168 of 214, 78.5%) than for nasotracheal intubation (NTI) (52 of 88, 59.1%). Median TTIs were 15 minutes (95% CI: 13, 17) for OTI and 25 minutes (95% CI: 23, 27) for NTI; this difference was significant (p = 0.002). For non-cardiac arrests, the difference i

The use of diltiazem for treating rapid atrial fibrillation in the out-of-hospital setting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the use of intravenous diltiazem for treatment of rapid atrial fibrillation or flutter (RAF) in the out-of-hospital setting. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of data with historical control subjects. Data were drawn from out-of-hospital patients reported to a statewide paramedic system who presented with atrial fibrillation or flutter and a ventricular response rate (VRR) of 150 beats/min or greater. The intervention (diltiazem) group included patients who received diltiazem during a 9-month period in 1999. The control group included patients from 1998 who did not receive diltiazem. Patients who were intubated or underwent cardioversion were omitted. Therapeutic response was defined as the occurrence of change to sinus rhythm, reduction of VRR to 100 beats/min or less, or reduction of baseline VRR by 20% or greater. Data were analyzed by using the chi(2) test, the Student's t test, and odds ratios (ORs). A Bonferroni adjusted P value of.005 was used to define statistical significance. RESULTS: Forty-three patients receiving diltiazem and 27 control subjects were included in the study. The mean total diltiazem dose was 19.8 mg (95% confidence interval 17.8 to 21.8). The diltiazem and control groups did not significantly differ with respect to age; sex; history of atrial fibrillation; prior use of digitalis, beta-blockers, or calcium channel blockers; concurrent out-of-hospital therapies; or baseline VRR or systolic blood pressure (P =.09 to 1.00). The difference in VRR reduction between the diltiazem and control groups was 38 beats/min (95% confidence interval 24 to 52); this difference was statistically significant (P <.001). The mean percentage reduction of VRR in the diltiazem group was -33.1%. The difference in systolic blood pressure change between the diltiazem and control groups was not statistically significant (P =.17). The diltiazem group had a higher prevalence of achieving VRR reduction to 100 beats/min or less than did the control group (OR 22.6; P <.001), of achieving a VRR reduction of 20% or greater (OR 19.3; P <.001), and of achieving overall therapeutic response (OR 19.3; P <.001). Few changed to sinus rhythm in either group (estimated OR 6.3; P =.15). No patients in the diltiazem group required treatment for hypotension, endotracheal intubation, resuscitation from cardiac arrest, or emergency treatment of unstable dysrhythmias. CONCLUSION: The effects of diltiazem on RAF can be appreciated within the constraints of the out-of-hospital environment. Diltiazem should be considered as a viable field therapy for rate control of RAF.

Paramedic success rate for blind nasotracheal intubation is improved with the use of an endotracheal tube with directional tip control.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Blind nasotracheal intubation (BNTI) is used to secure the airway in patients who are spontaneously breathing. The success rate for BNTI is often lower than for orotracheal intubation. We conducted this study to determine whether the use of an endotracheal tube (ETT) capable of directional tip control can improve the BNTI success rate. METHODS: This prospective, experimental study was conducted by a state emergency medical services agency during 1997, 1998, and 1999. Consecutive patients undergoing attempted BNTI or orotracheal intubation were included. Five paramedic units were trained to use an ETT with triggeractivated distal tip directional control for BNTIs (intervention group). Ten units used conventional ETTs for BNTIs and served as concurrent controls (control group). Subjects in the 2 groups were enrolled concurrently with nonrandomized allocation based on the agency providing service. An intubation attempt was defined by tube passage, and success was defined as confirmed endotracheal placement. RESULTS: A total of 219 BNTIs were studied (141 in the control group and 78 in the intervention group). BNTI was successful in 82 (58%) of 141 cases using conventional ETTs, and in 56 (72%) of 78 cases using directional tip control (P =.04). The overall success rate was 63%. CONCLUSION: Use of ETTs with distal directional control is associated with a higher success rate for BNTI than conventional ETTs. Use of ETTs with directional tip control significantly improves the success rates for BNTIs.

The utilization of midazolam as a pharmacologic adjunct to endotracheal intubation by paramedics.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacologic agents have been used in the prehospital setting for facilitating endotracheal intubation (ETI). The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of intravenous midazolam for prehospital patients who require pharmacologic relaxation to facilitate ETI. METHODS: Data were reviewed retrospectively using paramedic charts from an eight-month period for a three-county state EMS system. RESULTS: There were 26,133 paramedic dispatches during the study period. Six hundred eighty-three ETIs were attempted, including 72 midazolam-facilitated intubations (MFIs). The most common indications for MFI were "clenched teeth," "gag," and "combativeness." Successful MFI was achieved in 45 of 72 cases (62.5%). Midazolam-facilitated intubation was less successful for trauma patients (41.2%) than for medical patients (69.1 %) (p = 0.04). Of the 58 failed conventional ETIs that occurred during the study period, 25 (43.1%) were identified as having one or more indications for the use of MFI. Although the use of intravenous midazolam was effective in facilitating ETI, a high MFI failure rate (37.5%) was noted. CONCLUSION: Although it is of limited efficacy, MFI is underutilized and should be considered by medical direction as a pharmacologic adjunct to ETI in selected field patients.

Reducing the rate of paramedic needlesticks in emergency medical services: the role of self-capping intravenous catheters.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the frequency of unintentional needlesticks can be reduced by replacing conventional i.v. catheters with self-capping ones. METHODS: Retrospective cohort, historically controlled study, conducted in an emergency medical services advanced life support (ALS) service. The ALS service annually transports 12,000 patients, for whom i.v. therapy is attempted in about 65% of cases. The needlestick rate per 1,000 patients receiving attempts at i.v. access was examined during the 2 10-month periods, before and after introduction of a self-capping i.v. catheter. RESULTS: For the 2 periods, the percentage of patients for whom i.v. access was attempted remained constant at 65%. The success rate for i.v. access was statistically unchanged from 88% to 90% (p > 0.5, power = 0.995). During the period prior to use of the new catheter, 44 injuries were reported overall. Of these, 15 were due to unintentional needlesticks, 11 associated with contaminated needles. Following the system-wide introduction of the new catheter, only 1 of 31 reported injuries was due to needlestick (uncontaminated). The extrapolated annual incidence of contaminated needlesticks decreased from 169 (95% CI; 85, 253) to 0 (95% CI; 0, 46) per 100,000 i.v.attempts. The extrapolated incidence for all needlesticks decreased from 231 (95% CI; 132, 330) to 15 (95% CI; 0, 40) per 100,000 i.v. attempts. The absolute number of needlesticks and the proportion of injuries due to needlesticks decreased significantly (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The use of i.v. catheters with self-capping needles was associated with a significant reduction in the absolute number of inadvertent needlesticks as well as the proportion of injuries due to needlesticks among ALS providers. The use of self-capping i.v. catheters was feasible and did not appear to be a deterrent to initiating i.v. therapy in the out-of-hospital environment.

The effect of a quality improvement feedback loop on paramedic skills, charting, and behavior.

OBJECTIVE: A mechanism was initiated for conveying quality improvement (QI) results to paramedics as a means of improving chart documentation in difficult-to-correct areas. This study examines the impact of this QI feedback loop on charting, resuscitation rates from cardiac arrest, endotracheal intubation (ETI) success rates, and trauma scene times. DESIGN: Paramedic trip sheets were reviewed before and after the institution of the QI feedback loop in this interrupted time series design. SETTING: The New Castle County, Delaware, Paramedic Program. PARTICIPANTS: All New Castle County paramedics participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: In January 1990, the medical director began to circulate a QI summary among the paramedics in an effort to improve performance and chart documentation. The summary focused on the management of respiratory distress or arrest, cardiac arrest, and major trauma. The success rate for ETI was compared with the rate of field resuscitation from cardiac arrest, the percentage of unjustified prolonged trauma scene times (longer than 10 minutes), and the percent compliance with minimum endotracheal intubation documentation (ETID) requirements from a six-month period before institution of the QI feedback mechanism with data obtained from a six-month period after the program had been operational for one year. RESULTS: Comparing results from before with after the initiation of the QI program, the ETI success rate was 273 of 295 (92.5%) before and 300 of 340 (88.2%) after (chi 2 = 3.04, p < .1, ns); field resuscitations totaled 26 of 187 (13.9%) before and 44 of 237 (18.6) after (chi 2 = 1.40, p < .25, ns); ETID rate was 249 of 295 (84.4%) before and 336 of 340 (98.8%) after (chi 2 = 44.24, p < .001), and unjustified prolonged trauma scene times were 69 of 278 (24.8%) before and seven of 501 (1.4%) after (chi 2 = 320.5, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The use of QI feedback had little effect on psychomotor skills as the ETI success rate or resuscitation rate, but had a dramatic effect on chart documentation, as evidenced by ETID rate, and behavior, as evidenced by the reduction in prolonged trauma scene times. The use of QI feedback is recommended as a means of correcting charting deficiencies or modifying behavior.

Delaware Emergency Medical Services System: cardiac resuscitation.

The Delaware EMS system has been in existence for 20 years. Initially begun as one paramedic unit serving New Castle County, it now comprises 15 units in a statewide system. The goal of this report is to detail the EMS system's impact on prehospital cardiac resuscitation and airway management. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) encompass all aspects of managing a sick or injured patient prior to arrival to the hospital. From the time a patient dials 911 until they arrive in the care of a doctor in an emergency room, the EMS system provides initial medical evaluation and care as well as transportation to the hospital. The components of Delaware's EMS system include: 1. Bystanders--the public is often called upon to perform CPR until trained rescuers arrive. 2. Medical Dispatchers--they receive incoming 911 calls and determine the personnel needed. 3. First responders--ambulance crews trained in basic life support (BLS). 4. Second responders--ambulance crews trained in advanced life support (ALS), paramedics. 5. Medical Control--doctors who are in radio contact with paramedics to provide medical advice.