RESUMO
Purpose of the article: The aim of this multicenter observational study is to report data from real world on the use of bimekizumab in patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Elderly patients are poorly represented in clinical trials on bimekizumab for plaque psoriasis, and real-world studies are important to guide clinical choices.Materials and methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 33 dermatological outpatient clinics in Italy. Patients aged ≥ 65 years, with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and treated with bimekizumab were enrolled. No exclusion criteria were applied. Bimekizumab was administered following the Italian Guidelines for the management of plaque psoriasis and according to the summary of product characteristics, in adult patients who were candidates for systemic treatments. Overall, 98 subjects were included, and received bimekizumab up to week 36. Clinical and demographic data were collected before the initiation of treatment with bimekizumab. At baseline and each dermatological examination (4, 16, and 36 weeks), clinical outcomes were measured by the following parameters: (1) PASI score; (2) site-specific (scalp, palmoplantar, genital, nail) Psoriasis Global Assessment (PGA). At each visit, the occurrence of any adverse events (AEs) was recorded, including serious AEs and AEs leading to bimekizumab discontinuation.Results: The mean PASI score was 16.6 ± 9.4 at baseline and significantly decreased to 4.3 ± 5.2 after 4 weeks (p < 0.001), and 1.1 ± 1.7 after 16 week (p < 0.001). This level of improvement was maintained after 36 weeks (p < 0.001). PASI ≤2 was recorded in 36 (36.7%) at week 4, 68% and 69.4% at week 16 and 36, respectively. By week 16, 86/98 (87.8%) patients reached PASI75, 71/98 (72.4%) obtained PASI90, and 52/98 (53.1%) PASI100. Binary logistic regression tests showed a significant association of PASI100 by week 4 with lower PASI at baseline. PASI 100 at 16 or 36 weeks was not associated with baseline PASI, obesity, age, gender, previously naïve state, and presence of psoriatic arthritis. Patients naïve to biologics at baseline had similar response to bimekizumab as non-naïve subjects.Conclusions: Bimekizumab is a suitable option for elder patients as it is effective, tolerated and has a convenient schedule.
Assuntos
Psoríase , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Itália , Resultado do Tratamento , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Confirmatory data on the long-term effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in psoriatic patients from real-world studies are needed. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to evaluate the 3-year drug survival of ixekizumab in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, in a multicenter real-world setting. The secondary aim was to assess the influence of predictive factors on the drug survival of ixekizumab. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a cohort of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, who received at least one dose of ixekizumab before December 2018. The drug survival analysis was performed and descriptively analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were carried out including variables considered to be of clinical importance. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were enrolled. The overall drug survival at 12, 24, and 36 months of treatment with ixekizumab was 92.11%, 83.85%, and 80.19%, respectively. A higher probability (HR 2.34) of drug withdrawal was found among patients who had already received an anti-IL-17 agent compared with bio-naive patients (p 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: We found that ixekizumab is a biological agent characterized by long-term effectiveness, not influenced by several clinical factors and associated with a good safety profile.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Psoríase , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
Background: There are no papers exploring the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the injection-based practice in patients affected by different rheumatic diseases, including osteoarthritis. The aim was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on injection-based practice trough the Italian country. Study design: A survey-based retrospective cross-sectional study. Methods: An Italian-language questionnaire was developed by a group of senior researchers and distributed by e-mail to some Rheumatology, Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Units from different geographic areas of Italy. The survey included information about the number of injections performed during COVID-19 pandemic (stratified by injected agents and injected joint), in comparison to the pre-pandemic period, and the possible reasons behind an eventual reduction. Responses were collected and descriptive analysis calculated. Results: Eleven centers of the National Health Service completed the survey. The activities of the injections services significantly decreased across the country with a percentage of reduction of 60% compared to the pre-pandemic period. A significant reduction of both intra-articular and peri-articular injections was registered. Among intra-articular. treatments, the most affected ones were the hyaluronic acid injections, when compared to corticosteroids. A significant decrease of the total amount of peri-articular injections was observed. The strict government restrictions and the fear of patients to become infected represented the most limiting factors. Conclusions: The reported decrease of the injection-based practice in our country during the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of chronic musculoskeletal diseases with possible negative consequences in terms of disability and quality of life.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Idioma , Pandemias , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis contributes to unemployment, work impairment, missed workdays and substantial indirect costs due to lost productivity. Combination Cal/BD foam is the only topical that is approved for long-term maintenance treatment of plaque psoriasis for 52 weeks. This is the first known investigation of the effect of topical psoriasis therapy on productivity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the change in work productivity and activity impairment after 4 weeks of treatment with fixed-dose combination calcipotriol 50 µg/g/betamethasone dipropionate 0.5 mg/g (Cal/BD) foam and observe long-term changes after 52 weeks of long-term management (proactive or reactive treatment). METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the PSO-LONG trial - a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel group, international multi-centre trial of treatment with combination Cal/BD foam. Work and activity impairment due to psoriasis were assessed by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Psoriasis (WPAI:PSO) questionnaire at baseline, week 4, week 28 and week 56. The improvement in hours of work productivity was translated into monthly and annual indirect cost savings estimates for patients in Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. RESULTS: Using fixed-dose combination Cal/BD foam for four weeks significantly reduced psoriasis-related work presenteeism, total work productivity impairment (TWPI) and total activity impairment (TAI) over 56 weeks, with significant improvements observed as early as 4 weeks after the baseline visit. The proportion of patients reporting impact on work productivity (as measured by presenteeism and TWPI) and activity impairment (as measured by both DLQI-Q7b and TAI) also decreased. CONCLUSION: Fixed-dose combination Cal/BD foam used for long-term management of psoriasis significantly reduces psoriasis-related work productivity and activity impairment which may result in substantial indirect cost savings. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02899962, EudraCT number: 2016-000556-95.
Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos , Psoríase , Aerossóis , Betametasona , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) represent an increasing proportion of patients with psoriasis and 15% of these have moderate to severe disease. Biologics are being used frequently in this group of patients even though safety and efficacy data are limited. In addition, owing to anti-interleukin (IL)-23 therapies being a relatively recent option, no data have been reported about their use in elderly patients with psoriasis. AIM: To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab in real-world practice in elderly patients. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study that enrolled patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, treated with guselkumab, risankizumab or tildrakizumab. The length of the study for each group depended on the drug (44 weeks for risankisumab, 40 weeks for guselkumab and 28 weeks for tildrakizumab, owing to its more recent availability in Italy). RESULTS: In total, 34 patients were enrolled (n = 20 on guselkumab; n = 8 on risankizumab; n = 6 on tildrakizumab). At Week 4, 29.4% reached 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) and 8.8% reached 100% improvement in PASI (PASI100); at Week 28, PASI90 and PASI100 was reached by 58.8% and 29.4%, respectively. At the final follow-up (Week 40 or 44, depending on drug), data were available only for the risankizumab (Week 40) and guselkumab (Week 44) and groups, and showed that 71.4% of patients had reached PASI90 and 53.5% had reached PASI100. Four patients (11.7%) discontinued treatment. No significant differences were found between the three groups. The limitations of the study included its retrospective nature of the study, small sample size, and different numbers of patients and follow-up duration for the different groups (highest for guselkumab, lowest for tildrakizumab). CONCLUSION: The three anti-IL-23 therapies assessed are promising, safe and effective options in elderly patients, and there was no significant difference between them. However, more data are needed to confirm our results and to understand their role in the management of this group of patients.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Subunidade p19 da Interleucina-23/antagonistas & inibidores , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Idade de Início , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psoríase/imunologia , Indução de Remissão , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
COVID-19 , Psoríase , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of psoriasis is increasing among older people. Elderly patients with psoriasis represent a challenge for dermatologists owing to multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy and immune senescence, which lead to an increased possibility of adverse events (AEs), drug interactions and susceptibility to cancers and infections. Therefore, conventional systemic therapies are often contraindicated, with biologics appearing as the mainstay for moderate-to-severe disease. However, the data on efficacy and safety of biologics in older people are scant. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in elderly patients with psoriasis over a 2-year period. METHODS: A real-life retrospective observational study was performed on patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who were treated with secukinumab at the Psoriasis Care Unit of the University of Naples Federico II, Italy from June 2016 to June 2019. RESULTS: Mean Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) reduced from 11.4 ± 6.3 at baseline to 2.1 ± 1.7 at week 24 and 1.7 ± 1.9 at week 96 (P < 0.001 for all follow-up visits), with a final mean PASI reduction of 85.1%. A similar trend was noted for body surface area (BSA), with baseline value of 27.5 ± 15.7 decreasing to 6.8 ± 5.0 at week 24, and to 3.3 ± 2.5 at week 96 (P < 0.001 at all follow-up visits), with a final mean BSA score reduction of 88.0%. Registered AEs did not lead to secukinumab discontinuation, except in one patient (3.4%). CONCLUSION: Secukinumab seems to be a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients with psoriasis, who frequently have multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy and multiple failures with previous systemic treatments including biologics.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Superfície Corporal , Comorbidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Polimedicação , Prevalência , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Psoríase/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Segurança , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Certolizumab, a pegylated tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor, reduced disease activity in randomized trials of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Real-life data are missing. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the effectiveness and safety of certolizumab in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in routine clinical practice. METHODS: In this retrospective study involving 11 Italian sites, patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis received subcutaneous certolizumab (400 mg loading dose at 0, 2 and 4 weeks, followed by 200 mg every 2 weeks) for up to 52 weeks. Primary outcomes included mean change from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) scores, and the proportion of patients achieving a 75%, 90% or 100% reduction in PASI score. Other endpoints included Disease Activity Score computed on 44 joints correlated with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate during the first hour (DAS44-ESR), Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) score], inflammatory markers and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: In the study were enrolled 153 patients (mean age: 55 years). Certolizumab reduced the mean PASI score from baseline by 4.45, 6.30 and 7.58 at weeks 12, 24 and 52, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). At weeks 24 and 52, 69.6% and 83.3% of patients had a PASI score ≤3. DAS44-ESR, TJC, SJC and mNAPSI scores, and pain VAS were also all significantly improved from baseline at each time point. C-reactive protein levels decreased during treatment, being significant at week 24. On multivariate analysis, psoriasis duration, baseline PASI, mNAPSI and pain VAS scores were found to be predictive of the improvement in PASI score at week 12. CONCLUSION: Certolizumab displayed also in the real-life encouraging results in both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients.