[Routine electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy: performance in Black Africans]. / Indices électrocardiographiques de routine pour le diagnostic de l'hypertrophie ventriculaire gauche: performances chez le sujet noir africain.

OBJECTIVE: To determine, in Black Africans, the performance of routine electrocardiographic criteria in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHODS: Thirty voluntary healthy subjects and 154 patients were explored at echocardiography (according to Pen convention) and 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). The performance of Lewis, Sokolow and Cornell (Cornell S1 for a threshold of 28 mm in men, and Cornell S2, for a threshold of 24 mm) criteria were defined by their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: The prevalence of LVH in the 154 patients ranged from 15.6% to 35.7%, according to the ECG criteria. Sensitivities were of 0.19, 0.43, 0.30 and 0.76 for the Lewis, Sokolow, Cornell S1 respectively, and the specificities were of 0.89, 0.73, 0.91 and 0.54. Positive predictive value ranged from 0.16 (Cornell S2) to 0.91 (Cornell S2), and the negative predictive value, from 0.48 (Lewis) to 0.86 (Cornell S2). CONCLUSION: Routine ECG criteria for the diagnosis LVH have low performance in Black African. There is a need of new ECG criteria with better performance.

[The European Evaluation of Vertigo (EEV) scale: a clinical validation study]. / Validation clinique d'une échelle du vertige: EEV (European Evaluation of Vertigo).

Up until now, the questionnaires used to evaluate vertigo have been self-administered questionnaires that rate either symptoms and/or their consequences. In contrast, the European Evaluation of Vertigo scale (EEV) is a physician-administered questionnaire that only assesses symptoms of the vestibular syndrome: illusion of movement, duration of illusion, motion intolerance, neurovegetative signs, and instability. Twenty-six ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialists participated in this validation study conducted among 123 patients suffering from different types of vertigo. The reliability, responsiveness and construct, convergent and discriminant validity of the EEV scale were assessed. Construct, convergent and discriminant validity was determined by comparing the scores on the EEV scale with those obtained using the following validated scales: patient diary and conventional scale designed by the DPHM, functional scale of the AAO-HNS, and SF-36 scale, a generic quality of life scale. With the exception of the "neurovegetative signs" item, the reliability of the EEV scale is good, particularly in terms of interrater reliability (r = 0.93 for the global score), and responsiveness is high (p < 0.01). EEV scale has good correlations with the items of patient diary, DPHM scale and "physical" dimensions of SF-36, from the first evaluation, whereas this scale has poor correlation at Day 0, with the items of AAO scale and the "psychological" dimensions of SF-36. These results confirm that EEV scale is exclusively a symptomatic scale and does not interfere with the psychism. The EEV scale is therefore a validated physician-administered questionnaire capable of monitoring the course of vertigo and of assessing the efficacy of anti-vertigo treatments.