Mortality and guideline-directed medical therapy in real-world heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in commercially insured US patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and examine the effect of GDMT on all-cause mortality. GDMT for HFrEF includes pharmacologic therapies such as ß-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin (ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors to reduce morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Patients in the Optum Integrated File from 2007 to 2019Q3, ≥18 years, with history of HFrEF, were identified. Patients prescribed both a BB and either an ACE-I, ARB, or ARNI during 6-month post-diagnosis were assigned to the GDMT cohort. All others were assigned to the not on GDMT cohort. The GDMT cohort was further classified by those patients with a record of prescription fills for both classes of medications concurrently (GDMT concurrent medication fills). Mortality at 2 years was assessed with a Cox regression model accounting for baseline demographics, comorbidities, and diuretic use. RESULTS: This study identified 14 880 HFrEF patients, of which 70% had a record of GDMT, and 57% had a record of concurrent prescriptions. Patients in the not on GDMT cohort had 29% increased risk of mortality versus GDMT (hazard ratio 1.29; 95% CI (1.19-1.40); p < .0001). As a sensitivity analysis, the effect of patients not on GDMT compared to GDMT with concurrent medication fills was more pronounced, with a 37% increased mortality risk. CONCLUSION: In a real-world population of HFrEF patients, inadequate GDMT confers a 29% excess mortality risk over the 2-year follow-up.

Healthcare utilization and guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

Aim: This study examines the effect of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on healthcare utilization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from Optum® Integrated File from 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2020. Materials & methods: Patients with both a beta blocker and either an ACE inhibitor (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor were assigned to the GDMT cohort. All others were not on GDMT. Results: Estimated annual all cause hospitalizations and emergency department visits per 100 patients was 29% (80 vs 62 patients) and 26% higher (54 vs 43 patients; p < 0.0001) and annualized hospital days were longer (1.88 vs 1.64; p = 0.0020) for patients not on GDMT. Conclusion: In a real-world population, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, patients not optimally managed on GDMT had higher annualized healthcare utilization when compared with patients on GDMT.

Comparison of Survival in Patients With Clinically Significant Tricuspid Regurgitation With and Without Heart Failure (From the Optum Integrated File).

This study aimed to quantify survival rates for patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR) using real-world data. Several clinical conditions are associated with TR, including heart failure (HF), other valve disease (OVD), right-sided heart disease (RSHD), and others that impact mortality. Optum data from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2018 included patients age ≥18 years with TR and 12 months of continuous health plan enrollment before TR. Exclusion criteria were end-stage renal disease or known/primary organ pathology. Cohorts were created hierarchically: (1) TR with HF; (2) TR with OVD (no HF); (3) TR with RSHD only (no OVD or HF); (4) TR only. Survival was estimated using a Cox hazard model with an interaction term for TR severity and adjusted for patient demographics and Elixhauser co-morbidities. A total of 33,686 met study inclusion (1) TR with HF (26.6%); (2) TR with OVD (36.7%); (3) TR with RSHD only (17.1%); (4) TR only (19.6%). TR patients (regardless of severity) with HF, OVD or RSHD had an increased risk of mortality compared with patients with TR alone. TR severity was also significantly associated (hazard ratio = 1.33; p = 0.0002) with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. In conclusion, TR severity is significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, independent of associated conditions including HF, OVD, or RSHD. In patients with severe TR, the mortality risk is most pronounced for patients who had RSHD without HF or OVD before their TR diagnosis.

Healthcare utilization in clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation patients with and without heart failure.

Aim: This study evaluated how the presence of right-sided heart disease (RSHD), other valve disease (OVD) and heart failure (HF) impacts healthcare utilization in patients with tricuspid valve disease (tricuspid regurgitation [TR]). Materials & methods: Of the 33,686 patients with TR: 6618 (19.6%) had TR-only; 8952 (26.6%) had TR with HF; 12,367 (36.7%) had TR with OVD but no HF; and 5749 (17.1%) had TR with RSHD only. Results: The presence of RSHD, OVD or HF in patients with TR was independently associated with increased annualized hospitalizations, hospital days and costs relative to patients with TR alone. Conclusion: All three co-morbidities were associated with increased healthcare utilization, with HF showing the greatest impact across all measures.

Pulmonary Hypertension: A Brief Guide for Clinicians.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is classified into 5 clinical subgroups: pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), PH due to left-sided heart disease, PH due to chronic lung disease, chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), and PH with an unclear and/or multifactorial mechanisms. A range of underlying conditions can lead to these disorders. Overall, PH affects approximately 1% of the global population, and over half of patients with heart failure may be affected. Cardiologists are therefore likely to encounter PH in their practice. Routine tests in patients with symptoms and physical findings suggestive of PH include electrocardiography, chest radiography, and pulmonary function tests. Transthoracic echocardiography is used to estimate the probability of PH. All patients with suspected or confirmed PH, without confirmed left-sided heart or lung diseases, should have a ventilation-perfusion scan to exclude CTEPH. Right-sided heart catheterization is essential for accurate diagnosis and classification. All patients with PAH or CTEPH must be referred to a specialist center. Surgical pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for eligible patients with CTEPH. Targeted treatments (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogues, and prostacyclin receptor agonists) are licensed for patients with PAH. The soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat is the only licensed targeted therapy for patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH. Management of PH resulting from left-sided heart disease primarily involves treatment of the underlying condition.

Impact of mitral regurgitation on cardiovascular hospitalization and death in newly diagnosed heart failure patients.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) carries a poor prognosis, and the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) is not well understood. This analysis aimed to estimate the incremental effect of MR in patients newly diagnosed with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases were analysed. Included patients had at least one inpatient or two outpatient HF claims. A 6 month post-period after HF index was used to capture MR diagnosis and severity. HF patients were separated into three cohorts: without MR (no MR), not clinically significant MR (nsMR), and significant MR (sMR). Time-to-event analyses were modelled to estimate the clinical burden of disease. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or cardiovascular (CV)-related admission. Secondary outcomes were death and CV hospitalization alone. All models controlled for baseline demographics and co-morbidities. Patients with sMR were at significantly higher risk of either death or CV admission compared with patients with no MR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.39]. When evaluating death alone, patients with sMR had significantly higher risk of death (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.43) compared with patients with no MR. When evaluating CV admission alone, patients with MR were at higher risk of hospital admission vs. patients with no MR, and the magnitude was dependent upon the MR severity: sMR (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.38-1.74) and nsMR (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.08-1.40). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of MR in retrospective claims significantly increases the clinical burden of incident HF patients. Time to death and CV hospitalizations are increased when MR is clinically significant.

The economic impact of clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation in a large, administrative claims database.

Aim: This study aimed to quantify the healthcare burden of clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with and without heart failure (HF).Materials and Methods: Data were from the IBM MarketScan Research Databases from October 2011 to September 2016. Eligible patients met the following inclusion criteria: age ≥18 with a TR diagnosis, 12 months pre (baseline), and 6 months post (landmark) medical enrollment. The landmark period was used to categorize TR severity, defined as a record of pulmonary hypertension with ascites, lower extremity edema or hepatic insufficiency, or tricuspid valve surgery. Cohorts were defined based on TR etiology and severity: (1) no HF and no clinically significant TR; (2) HF with no clinically significant TR; (3) no HF with clinically significant TR; and (4) HF with clinically significant TR. Outcomes of interest were all-cause hospitalizations, hospital days, and expenditures. Multivariable models were fit for each of the annualized outcomes and adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and other concomitant valve diseases.Results: There were 92,994 patients eligible for analysis. Patients with no HF and no clinically significant TR had the annualized healthcare burden of 0.20 all-cause hospitalizations (approximately one inpatient hospitalization every 5 years), 1.07 hospital days, and $17,478 in expenditures. The presence of clinically significant TR, alone or with HF, significantly increased healthcare utilization and expenditures. For patients with no HF with clinically significant TR, the annualized economic burden increased to 0.41 all-cause hospitalizations, 3.13 hospital days, and $29,985 in expenditures. For patients with HF and clinically significant TR, the annualized economic burden was even greater with 0.59 all-cause hospitalizations, 4.31 hospital days, and $42,255 in expenditures.Conclusion: The presence of clinically significant TR is associated with an increase in healthcare utilization and expenditures, irrespective of the presence of HF.

Twelve-month healthcare utilization and expenditures in Medicare fee-for-service patients with clinically significant mitral regurgitation.

Aim: This study sought to quantify the healthcare burden of Medicare patients with clinically significant mitral regurgitation (sMR). Materials & methods: Proxy definitions were used for sMR, including MR surgery, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension or >2 echocardiograms. Results: In this study, 11,173 patients had significant degenerative MR (sDMR); 25,402 had significant functional MR (sFMR); and 12,232 had significant uncharacterized MR (sUMR). Patients with sFMR (18,880) were more likely to be hospitalized and present to the emergency department compared with patients with sDMR (9,795) or sUMR (10,587). Annual healthcare expenditures for sMR patients were: US$29,328 for sFMR; US$17,112 for sUMR; and US$12,870 for sDMR. Conclusion: Novel therapeutic interventions merit further evaluation to reduce the substantial healthcare burden of sMR in the Medicare population.

The Economic Impact of Mitral Regurgitation on Patients With Medically Managed Heart Failure.

The objective of this study was to quantify the financial healthcare burden of mitral regurgitation (MR) on medically managed heart failure (HF) patients. Data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental Databases were analyzed. Included patients had a minimum of 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims for HF with a 6-month preperiod (baseline). A 6-month postperiod (landmark) after HF index was used to capture MR diagnosis and severity. Following the landmark period, patients had to have 12 months of continuous medical and prescription drug plan enrollment with at least 2 records of HF medication refills. A therapeutic intensity score was calculated based on HF medication usage. Medically managed HF patients were separated into 3 cohorts: without MR (no MR), insignificant MR (iMR), and significant MR (sMR). Healthcare utilization and all-cause expenditures were modeled to quantify the burden of MR. All models controlled for baseline demographics, co-morbid conditions, and HF therapeutic intensity. Medically managed incident HF patients with sMR had significantly more hospital days (1.91 vs 1.72 days; p = 0.0096) and annual expenditures ($23,988 vs $21,530; p < 0.0001) compared with no MR patients. No differences were identified when comparing iMR and no MR. When evaluating HF admissions, sMR patients had an estimated 50% greater HF admissions rate (0.036 vs 0.024; p < 0.0001) compared with no MR patients. Additionally, HF admits for iMR were 23% more than those with no MR (0.029 vs 0.024; p = 0.0064). In conclusion, evidence of MR in retrospective claims significantly increases the healthcare impact of medically managed HF patients. Both utilization and financial burden is more pronounced when MR is clinically significant.

The healthcare burden of disease progression in medicare patients with functional mitral regurgitation.

Objective: This retrospective database analysis estimated the incremental effect that disease progression from non-clinically significant functional mitral regurgitation (nsFMR) to clinically significant FMR (sFMR) has on clinical outcomes and costs. Methods: Medicare Fee for Service beneficiaries with nsFMR were examined, defined as those with a heart failure diagnosis prior to MR. Patients were classified as ischemic if there was a history of: CAD, AMI, PCI, or CABG. The primary outcome was time to sFMR, defined as pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, mitral valve surgery, serial echocardiography, or death, using a Cox hazard regression model. Annualized hospitalizations, inpatient hospital days, and healthcare expenditures were also modeled. Results: Patients with IHD had higher risk (Hazard Ratio = 1.22 [1.14-1.30]) for disease progression compared to patients without. The progression cohort had significantly more annual inpatient hospitalizations (non-IHD = 1.32; IHD = 1.40) than the non-progression cohort (non-IHD = 0.36; IHD = 0.34), and significantly more annual inpatient hospital days (non-IHD = 13.07; IHD = 13.52) than the non-progression cohort (non-IHD = 2.29; with IHD = 2.08). The progression cohort had over 3.5-times higher costs vs the non-progression cohort, independent of IHD (non-IHD = $12,798 vs $46,784; IHD = $12,582 vs $49,348). Conclusion: Treating FMR patients earlier in their clinical trajectory may prevent disease progression and reduce high rates of healthcare utilization and expenditures.

Can hospital rounds with pocket ultrasound by cardiologists reduce standard echocardiography?

BACKGROUND: Frequently, hospitalized patients are referred for transthoracic echocardiograms. The availability of a pocket mobile echocardiography device that can be incorporated on bedside rounds by cardiologists may be a useful and frugal alternative. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study designed to compare the accuracy of pocket mobile echocardiography images with those acquired by transthoracic echocardiography in a sample of hospitalized patients. Each patient referred for echocardiography underwent pocket mobile echocardiography acquisition and interpretation by a senior cardiology fellow with level II training in echocardiography. Subsequently, transthoracic echocardiography was performed by skilled ultrasonographers and interpreted by experienced echocardiographers. Both groups were blinded to the results of the alternative imaging modality. Visualizability and accuracy for all key echocardiographic parameters (ejection fraction, wall motion abnormalities, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, inferior vena cava size, aortic and mitral valve pathology, and pericardial effusion) were determined and compared between imaging modalities. RESULTS: A total of 240 hospitalized patients underwent echocardiography with pocket mobile echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography. The mean age was 71 ± 17 years. Pocket mobile echocardiography imaging time was 6.3 ± 1.5 minutes. Sensitivity of pocket mobile echocardiography varied by parameter and was highest for aortic stenosis (97%) and lowest for aortic insufficiency (76%). Specificity also varied by parameter and was highest for mitral regurgitation (100%) and lowest for left ventricular ejection fraction (92%). Equivalence testing revealed the pocket mobile echocardiography outcomes to be significantly equivalent to the transthoracic echocardiography outcomes with no discernible differences in image quality between pocket mobile echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography (P = 7.22 × 10(-7)). All outcomes remain significant after correcting for multiple testing using the false discovery rate. CONCLUSIONS: The results from rapid bedside pocket mobile echocardiography examinations performed by experienced cardiology fellows compared favorably with those from formal transthoracic echocardiography studies. For hospitalized patients, this finding could shift the burden of performing and interpreting the echocardiogram to the examining physician and reduce the number and cost associated with formal echocardiography studies.

A novel technique for ultra-low contrast administration during angiography or intervention.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after coronary angiography or intervention is associated with substantial morbidity. The data supporting various prophylactic measures and adjunctive therapies to prevent this complication are conflicting. However, contrast volume is clearly related to CIN after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and the risk of CIN has been shown to be directly related to contrast dose. Therefore, minimizing contrast exposure is a primary method to reduce the risk of CIN, especially in at-risk patients. We report a novel technique designed to deliver ultra-low (<15 cm(3)) volume contrast to patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography and PCI.