Barriers and Facilitators to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake Among Men Who have Sex with Men Who Use Stimulants: A Qualitative Study.

The HIV epidemic disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men (MSM), particularly those who use stimulants. We explored barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among this population. From June 2018 through February 2019, we conducted semi-structured interviews in Providence, Rhode Island, and New Haven, Connecticut, with 21 MSM who reported recent (past six months) stimulant use. We identified individual, interpersonal, and structural barriers to PrEP, including: (1) high awareness but mixed knowledge of PrEP, resulting in concerns about side effects and drug interactions; (2) interest that was partly determined by substance use and perceived HIV risk; (3) fragmented and constrained social networks not conducive to disseminating PrEP information; and (4) PrEP access, such as insurance coverage and cost. Our findings suggest potential approaches to increase PrEP uptake in this group, including promotion through mainstream and social media, clarifying misinformation, and facilitating increased access through structural interventions.

RESUMEN: La epidemia del VIH afecta de manera desproporcionada a los hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH), particularmente a aquellos que usan estimulantes. Exploramos las barreras y los facilitadores para la adopción de la profilaxis previa a la exposición (PrEP) en esta población. Desde junio de 2018 hasta febrero de 2019, realizamos entrevistas semiestructuradas en Providence, Rhode Island y New Haven, Connecticut, con 21 HSH que nos informaron de haber usado estimulantes recientemente (en los últimos seis meses). Identificamos barreras individuales, interpersonales, y estructurales para la PrEP, que incluyen: (1) gran conciencia pero conocimiento mixto de la PrEP, lo que produce preocupaciones sobre los efectos secundarios y las interacciones farmacológicas; (2) interés que fue determinado en parte por el uso de sustancias y el riesgo percibido de VIH; (3) redes sociales fragmentadas y restringidas que no conducen a la difusión de información sobre la PrEP; y (4) problemas con el acceso a la PrEP, como la cobertura y el costo del seguro. Nuestros hallazgos sugieren enfoques potenciales para aumentar la aceptación de la PrEP en esta población, incluida la promoción a través de los medios tradicionales y sociales, aclarando la información errónea, y facilitando un mayor acceso a través de intervenciones estructurales.

Substance Use Treatment Engagement among Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Stimulants in the Northeastern United States.

BACKGROUND: Stimulant use is increasing in the United States (U.S.), especially among men who have sex with men (MSM). Objectives: We sought to ascertain barriers and facilitators to substance use treatment utilization among MSM who use stimulants in the northeastern U.S. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with MSM who reported recent stimulant use. Interviews explored perceptions of and experiences with substance use treatment. We used thematic analysis to identify factors that facilitated or impeded substance use treatment engagement. Results: We interviewed 21 MSM in Providence, Rhode Island (n = 15) and New Haven, Connecticut (n = 6). Most participants identified as White (57.1%) and gay (52.4%). Over half (52.4%) screened positive for stimulant use disorder. We identified themes in how participants defined, entered, and engaged in substance use treatment. Participants described treatment to include a variety of modalities, including self-help and peer support groups; they defined treatment as an iterative process. Social networks played both a supportive and obstructive role in treatment entry depending on the relationships and approaches of network members. Meanwhile, social connection during treatment could be both therapeutic (reducing isolation) and counterproductive (precipitating cravings to use). Participants generally expressed a desire for harm reduction approaches to treatment over abstinence-only ones. Finally, participants did not find treatment responsive to their needs as MSM. Conclusion: This study highlights key barriers and facilitators to substance use treatment engagement and underscores the urgent need for culturally-responsive treatment programs that employ harm reduction approaches and are tailored to the unique circumstances of MSM who use stimulants.Supplemental data for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2026965.