Getting the Message: The Declining Trend in Opioid Prescribing for Minor Orthopaedic Injuries in Children and Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Opioids constitute the fastest-growing drug problem among children and adolescents in the United States. Recent heavy media coverage on the opioid prescription epidemic has garnered increased attention from prescribers and policymakers. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in opioid prescribing for nonoperatively managed pediatric fractures and dislocations in order to examine changes in opioid-prescribing patterns across various U.S. regions. METHODS: A retrospective review of the national Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database comprising 42 pediatric hospitals was performed to identify pediatric fractures and dislocations presenting to the emergency department (ED) or outpatient clinics from 2004 to 2017. We included patients with the 10 most frequently encountered diagnoses who were nonoperatively managed and were discharged home the same day. To account for hospital variation, we utilized a mixed-effects logistic regression model. RESULTS: The final cohort included 134,931 patients, with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 12.57 ± 2.00 years (range, 10 to 18 years); 69.23% of patients were male. Overall, 51.69% of patients were prescribed at least 1 opioid dose during their ED or clinic visits. Of the patients receiving opioids, 72.04% were male and 54.10% were insured through a private insurance plan. When prescription trends were compared according to regions, children were more likely to be prescribed opioids in the South (71.37% more likely) and the Midwest (26.17% more likely) than in the Northeast. CONCLUSIONS: Although the opioid prescription rates in all 4 regions have decreased dramatically over the years, some regions were quicker than others in responding to the opioid epidemic. A significant interregional variability in opioid-prescribing practices still exists, but an overall downward trend in opioid prescription rates for acute pain management in conservatively treated pediatric fractures and dislocations is evidence of progress in tackling the opioid crisis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Opioid-related misuse is a national epidemic and reducing the use of opioids in pediatric orthopaedic procedures is critical. Although regional variability in opioid-prescribing practices still exists, an overall downward trend in opioid prescription rates for acute pain management in conservatively treated pediatric fractures and dislocations is evidence of progress in tackling the opioid crisis.

Reliability and Validity of an MRI-Based Knee Sagittal Alignment Measure in a Pediatric Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sagittal alignment is a measure that has been described and validated in the adult population as a means of distinguishing normal knees from those with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, but this measure has not been formally assessed among pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the reliability of this MRI-based measure in a pediatric cohort, and (2) validate its ability to distinguish between ACL and non-ACL-injured knees in this population. METHODS: A consecutive series of knee MRI examinations performed at our center were reviewed to identify studies of pediatric patients (1) with ACL injury, and (2) without significant pathology. Patient age, sex, physeal status (open, closing, or closed), knee laterality, and magnet strength (1.5 or 3-Tesla) were collected. The sagittal alignment was measured in both medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments using a previously described method. Mean anterior tibial translation was then calculated for each study. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability testing was performed on a subset of randomly-selected patients from each cohort by three raters by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. Sagittal alignment measurements of all patients were then completed by a single author after reliability was confirmed. The medial and lateral compartment translation and mean anterior tibial translation measurements of normal and ACL-injured knees were compared. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 131 studies: 86 from uninjured knees (normal cohort) and 45 knees with ACL injury (ACL cohort). Studies were performed at a mean age of 13.4 with a near equivalent sex distribution. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability were good to excellent for all measures for patients in both normal and ACL cohorts. Normal and ACL-injured knees demonstrated a significant difference in anterior tibial translation in all measured regions. The mean anterior tibia translation for ACL-injured knees was 2.01 mm (95% confidence interval: 1.03-2.98) versus -0.44 mm (95% confidence interval: -0.89-0.014). CONCLUSION: This study identified good to excellent inter-rater and intrarater reliability of knee sagittal alignment measurements among pediatric patients. It also demonstrated a significant difference in medial compartment, lateral compartment, and mean tibial translation in patients with and without ACL injury, validating previous findings demonstrated in adult cohorts. These findings may be useful in assisting providers in the confirmation of suspected ACL injury and insufficiency and guide operative management in cases of clinical uncertainty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected multi-center database. PURPOSE: UPROR (Unplanned Return to the Operating Room) is an inclusive metric for unexpected surgery after the index procedure. Given the many quality and safety improvements in AIS surgery over the past 20 years, it is useful for spine deformity surgeons to understand the current rate of UPROR, the etiologies, and trends over time. A report from a very large data set, including multiple surgeons and centers, with longer follow-up, would provide the clearest picture. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective multi-center database of patients who had AIS deformity correction surgery to analyze all cases of UPROR, using linear regression models, survival analysis, and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Among 3464 patients who had surgery (ASF, PSF, or ASF + PSF) for AIS from 1995 to 2017, 4.8% had an UPROR event in one of the following categories: surgical-site-related (43.3%), instrument failures (34.3%), revisions (8.4%), neurologic (5.1%), pulmonary (5.1%), medical (0.6%), and other (3.4%). The average time from initial surgery to UPROR was 734.4 days. 45.5% of UPRORs occurred within 1 year, 12.4% between 1 and 2 years, 30.9% between 2 and 5 years, and 11.2% between 5 and 10 years. In patients with at least 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year follow-up, the UPROR rates were 6.6, 7.3, and 9.2%, respectively. Between 1997 and 2013, the UPROR rate decreased by 0.46% per year (95% CI 0.25-0.68, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: UPROR has decreased significantly over time but as expected, increases with increased follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Incidence in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries among adolescent athletes is steadily increasing. Identification of the highest risk sports for ACL injuries by sex and competitive setting (ie, practice vs match) is important for targeting injury prevention programs. PURPOSE: To identify the risk of ACL injuries in adolescent athletes by sport, sex, and setting across a variety of common US and international sports. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHODS: Essentially, 3 online databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for all studies of ACL injuries per athlete-exposure (AE) or hours of exposure in adolescent athletes. Injuries were then pooled and incidence rates (IRs) reported per 1000 AEs or hours of exposure, with the relative risk (RR) of injuries calculated for sex-comparable sports. IRs per competitive setting (match vs practice) were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 1235 ACL injuries over 17,824,251 AEs were identified (IR, 0.069 [95% CI, 0.065-0.074]), with 586 of these injuries in girls across 6,986,683 AEs (IR, 0.084 [95% CI, 0.077-0.091]) versus 649 injuries in boys over 10,837,568 AEs (IR, 0.060 [95% CI, 0.055-0.065]). Girls had a higher overall rate of ACL injuries (RR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.25-1.57]), with the most disproportionate risk observed in basketball (RR, 4.14 [95% CI, 2.98-5.76]). The risk of ACL injuries by sex was highest in girls' soccer (IR, 0.166 [95% CI, 0.146-0.189]) and boys' football (IR, 0.101 [95% CI, 0.092-0.111]). ACL injuries were over 8 (RR, 8.54 [95% CI, 6.46-11.30]) and 6 (RR, 6.85 [95% CI, 5.52-8.49]) times more likely to occur in a match versus a practice setting for female and male athletes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The risk of ACL injuries overall approached nearly 1 per 10,000 AEs for female athletes, who were almost 1.5 times as likely as male athletes to suffer an ACL injury across all adolescent sports. A multisport female athlete was estimated to have a nearly 10% risk of ACL injuries over her entire high school or secondary school career. Specifically, male and female adolescents playing soccer, basketball, lacrosse, and football appeared at particular risk of injuries, a finding that can be used to target an injury intervention.

Where Have All the Fractures Gone? The Epidemiology of Pediatric Fractures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health measures to encourage social distancing have been implemented, including cancellation of school and organized sports. A resulting change in pediatric fracture epidemiology is expected. This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fracture incidence and characteristics. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study comparing acute fractures presenting to a single level I pediatric trauma hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic with fractures during a prepandemic period at the same institution. The "pandemic" cohort was gathered from March 15 to April 15, 2020 and compared with a "prepandemic" cohort from the same time window in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: In total, 1745 patients presenting with acute fractures were included. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of fractures presenting to our practice during the pandemic (22.5±9.1/d vs. 9.6±5.1/d, P<0.001). The presenting age for all fractures decreased during the pandemic (7.5±4.3 vs. 9.4±4.4 y, P<0.001) because of decreased fracture burden among adolescents. There were also a decrease in the number of fractures requiring surgery (2.2±1.8/d vs. 0.8±0.8/d, P<0.001). During the pandemic, there was an increase in the proportion of injuries occurring at home (57.8% vs. 32.5%, P<0.001) or on bicycles (18.3% vs. 8.2%, P<0.001), but a decrease in those related to sports (7.2% vs. 26.0%, P<0.001) or playgrounds (5.2% vs. 9.0%, P<0.001). There was no increase in time-to-presentation. Patients with distal radius torus fractures were more likely to receive a velcro splint during the pandemic (44.2% vs. 25.9%, P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric fracture volume has decreased 2.5-fold during the COVID-19 pandemic, partially because of cessation of organized sports and decreased playground use. In endemic regions, lower trauma volume may allow redeployment of orthopaedic surgeons and staff to other clinical arenas. Given the rising proportion of bicycling injuries, an emphasis on basic safety precautions could improve public health. An observed increase in the prescription of velcro splints for distal radius fractures highlights an opportunity for simplified patient care during the pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.