RESUMO
Background: Applying a single anti-Xa assay, calibrated to unfractionated heparin to measure rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban would simplify laboratory procedures and save healthcare costs. Aim: We hypothesized that a heparin-calibrated anti-Xa assay would accurately measure rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban drug concentrations and correctly predict clinically relevant drug levels. Methods: This analysis is part of the Simple-Xa study, a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in clinical practice. Patients treated with rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban were included. Anti-Xa activity was measured using the Siemens INNOVANCE® Heparin assay. Drug concentrations were determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Cut-off levels were determined in a derivation dataset (50% of patients) and sensitivities and specificities were calculated in a verification dataset (50% of patients). Results: Overall, 845 patients were available for analysis. Correlation coefficients (r s ) between the heparin-calibrated anti-Xa assay and drug concentrations were 0.97 (95% CI 0.97, 0.98) for rivaroxaban, 0.96 (0.96, 0.97) for apixaban, and 0.96 (0.94, 0.99) for edoxaban. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was 0.99 for all clinically relevant drug concentrations. In the verification dataset, the sensitivity was 94.2% (95% CI 90.8-96.6) for 30 µg L-1, 95.8% (92.4-98.0) for 50 µg L-1, and 98.7% (95.5-99.9) for 100 µg L-1. Specificities were 86.3% (79.2-91.7), 89.8% (84.5-93.7), and 88.7% (84.2-92.2), respectively. Conclusion: In a large prospective study in clinical practice, a strong correlation of heparin-calibrated anti-Xa measurements with LC-MS/MS results was observed and clinically relevant drug concentrations were predicted correctly.
RESUMO
Background: The thrombin generation assay (TG) is a promising approach to measure the degree of anticoagulation in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). A strong association with plasma drug concentrations would be a meaningful argument for the potential use to monitor DOAC. Objectives: We aimed to study the correlation of TG with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban drug concentrations in a large, prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Methods: Five-hundred and fifty-nine patients were included in nine tertiary hospitals. The Technothrombin® TG was conducted in addition to an anti-Xa assay; LC-MS/MS was performed as the reference standard. Results: Correlation (rs) between thrombin generation measurements and drug concentrations was -0.72 for peak thrombin generation (95% confidence interval, CI, -0.77, -0.66), -0.55 for area under the curve (AUC; 95% CI -0.61, -0.48), and 0.80 for lag time (95% CI 0.75, 0.84). In contrast, rs was 0.96 with results of the anti-Xa activity (95% CI 0.95-0.97). Sensitivity with regard to the clinically relevant cut-off value of 50 µgL-1 was 49% in case of peak thrombin generation (95% CI, 44, 55), 29% in case of AUC (95% CI, 24, 34), and 64% in case of lag time (95% CI, 58, 69). Sensitivity of the anti-Xa assay was 95% (95% CI, 92, 97). Conclusions: The correlation of thrombin generation measurements with DOAC drug concentrations was weak, and clinically relevant drug levels were not predicted correctly. Our results do not support an application of TG in the monitoring of DOAC.
