Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Viral Hepat ; 25(9): 1066-1077, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29624813

RESUMO

New drugs for treating hepatitis C have considerably increased the probability of being cured. Treatment uptake, however, is still low. The objectives of this study were to analyse the impact of initiatives that may increase the proportion of infected people on treatment and interventions aimed at reducing the incidence of new infection among people who inject drugs. A compartmental model for Norway was used to simulate hepatitis C and related complications. We analysed 2 different screening initiatives aimed to increase the proportion of infected people on treatment. Interventions aiming at reducing the hepatitis C incidence analysed were opioid substitution therapy (OST), a clean needle and syringe programme and a combination of both. The most cost-effective strategy for increasing hepatitis C treatment uptake was screening by general practitioners while simultaneously allowing for all infected people to be treated. We estimated that this intervention reduces the incidence of hepatitis C by 2030 by 63% compared with the current incidence. The 2 harm reduction strategies both reduced the incidence of hepatitis C by about 70%. Combining an increase in the current clean needles and syringe programme with OST was clearly the most cost-effective option. This strategy would reduce the incidence of hepatitis C by 80% compared with the current incidence by 2030. Thus, interventions to reduce the burden and spread of hepatitis C are cost-effective. Reaching the WHO target of a 90% reduction in hepatitis C incidence by 2030 may be difficult without combining different initiatives.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Antivirais/economia , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Troca de Agulhas/economia , Programas de Troca de Agulhas/métodos , Noruega/epidemiologia , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/economia , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
2.
Knee ; 17(3): 204-9, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19864145

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to investigate anteroposterior instability in the CKS and the PFC total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs. Physical examinations, including VAS, IKS and WOMAC were performed in combination with a detailed fluoroscopic measurement technique for three-dimensional kinematic assessment of TKA design function. Anteroposterior instability rated with the IKS was not significantly different (p=0.34), but patients with a CKS design showed more limitations according to the WOMAC joint stiffness total score, and for items regarding higher flexion activities in the WOMAC score for knee disability. Kinematic analyses showed that the CKS design tended to have more anterior sliding of the femur on the tibia during mid- and deep flexion activities. The sliding distance was larger at the medial than at the lateral side. This phenomenon has also been described for posterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. Furthermore, the CKS design showed a significantly lower range of tibial rotation (p<0.05) from maximum extension to maximum flexion during deep knee bend activities. Kinematic differences can be ascribed to posterior cruciate ligament deficiency/laxity or differences in TKA designs.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Prótese do Joelho , Desenho de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior
3.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 124(5): 331-3, 2004 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15083311

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We performed a clinical follow-up study to investigate whether three orthopaedic surgeons were equally satisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients (39 TKAs, mean follow-up 12 months) were reviewed, using the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSCRS). For the assessment of satisfaction a visual analogue scale (VAS) was used. RESULTS: We did not find a significant difference in satisfaction between the surgeons. However, there was a significant difference in the knee score and function score of the KSCRS as evaluated by the orthopaedic surgeons (p=0.006 and p=0.04, respectively). The correlation between the knee score and the surgeons' satisfaction was high, which indicates that pain, range of motion and deformity are important success criteria for surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, surgeons scored differently in the KSCRS but were equally satisfied after TKA.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Médicos/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Amplitude de Movimento Articular
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...