Relevance of procalcitonin levels in comparison to other markers of inflammation in hemodialysis patients.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) in hemodialysis (HD) patients and its correlation to other traditional inflammatory markers. METHODS: We measured plasma PCT levels in 120 patients on maintenance HD. PCT levels were compared with C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), prealbumin, and albumin. We also examined the above parameters subgroups, especially in diabetics and the elderly. Relations between parameters were studied by Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: PCT concentrations were higher than the upper normal limit of 0.5 ng/ mL in 38% of the patients. All patients with increased CRP had PCT concentrations higher than the upper normal limit. Plasma CRP concentrations were positively correlated to IL-6 (r = 0.304). Prealbumin was negatively correlated with CRP (r = 0.259) and with IL-6 (r = 0.388). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of elevated IL-6 and CRP levels was associated with an altered nutritional status. The concomitant elevations in PCT, CRP, and IL-6 could be more sensitive in the evaluation of inflammation.

Cellular immunity and levels of parathyroid hormone in uremic patients receiving hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical relevance of altered lymphocyte function and the possible relation with uremic toxins, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) is not well understood. We studied the changes in cellular immunity in patients in hemodialysis (HD) therapy and examined the relationship between T-lymphocyte function and plasma levels of PTH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (14 male) were enrolled in this study (mean age: 63.20 +/- 10.01 years, M +/- SD, 12 h/week HD). Our study population was divided into two groups: 18 patients with increased levels of PTH and 16 patients with normal levels of PTH. Lymphocyte subsets (CD2+, CD3+, CD3+/4+, CD3+/8+, CD19+, CD3-/16+56+, CD4/CD8 ratio) were quantitated in both groups using monoclonal antibodies (Immunotech, Coulter) and flow cytometric analysis. Following analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing was performed to test differences between groups (SPSS version 10). RESULTS: A significant increase of CD2 was noticed in patients with increased levels of PTH (84.8 +/- 5.5 vs. 79.8 +/- 4, p<0.05). The CD3 population was also increased in patients with elevated PTH (72 +/- 8.6 vs. 68 +/- 9.2, p=NS). This group of patients had also significantly increased levels of CD3/8 (44.8 +/- 9.8 vs. 37.1 +/- 5.8, p<0.05). The CD4/CD8 ratio levels were higher in patients with elevated PTH compared with those who had normal PTH (2.2 +/- 1.5 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.8, p=NS). CONCLUSIONS: The elevated level of PTH seems to affect the lymphocyte function and is associated with changes in cellular immunity in the hemodialysis population. Our study is in progress in order to enlarge our study population and collect more data, which will lead us to more solid conclusions.

Lymphocytes subsets in the course of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

BACKGROUND: We studied lymphocyte subset counts in comparison with normal subjects in order to clarify the abnormalities of cellular immune responses in uremic patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). METHODS: The study included 37 CAPD patients and 45 normal individuals, as the control group. For the study, CAPD patients were divided into four groups depending on duration of replacement therapy. Group I consisted of patients treated for 0-6 months (n=6), group II for 6-12 months (n=6), group III for 13-24 months (n=16), and group IV for more than 25 months (n=9). Flow cytometry was used for estimation of lymphocyte subsets (determination of CD2, CD3, CD3+/CD4+, CD3+/CD8+, CD3-/16+56+, CD19, CD4/CD8). RESULTS: Our patients started CAPD with decreased lymphocyte subset counts, slightly above the normal range (excluding CD3 -/16+56+, CD2). After 6 months of CAPD therapy, an increase in CD4/CD8 ratio was observed and all examined lymphocyte subset counts decreased (excluding CD2). In patients on CAPD for more than 25 months, CD3+/CD4+, CD19 counts were below the normal range, CD3 -/16+56+ exceeded the upper limit of normal range and at the same time mean total lymphocyte count (TLC) was maintained in the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend lymphocyte subset determinations for detection of immune abnormalities in the course of CAPD treatment.

Glomerular filtration rate estimation in renal transplant patients based on serum cystatin-C levels: comparison with other markers of glomerular filtration rate.

PURPOSE: The assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most commonly used test of renal function. Cystatin-C, a cysteine protease inhibitor, which can be measured by light-scattering immunoassay, possesses many of the attributes required of the ideal GFR marker. Conversely, many endogenous markers that are widely used for the estimation of GFR such as serum creatinine (SCr) are not ideal. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical application of serum cystatin-C (CysC) as a new marker of GFR in renal transplant patients. METHODS: Eighteen patients (9 men) were enrolled in the study (mean age: 46.35, range: 31-67 years) to measure serum CysC levels and compare them, with SCr, creatinine clearance (CCr), as well as the Cockcroft-Gault equation (CG) or the MDRD as indicator of GFR. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between CysC and other markers. RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between serum CysC and CCr (r = -0.768). Moreover, the CysC level was negatively correlated with CG (r = -0.854), positively correlated with SCr (r = 0.629), and negatively correlated with MDRD (r = -0.604). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that measurement of serum cystatin-C was useful and accurate to estimate GFR in renal transplant patients. The recent literature confirms our data although there are concerns about nonrenal influence on this test. Although serum CysC can generally be recommended as a marker for GFR, our study is still in progress seeking to validate the conclusions in a larger number of patients.