Recommendations for Vaccination in Adult Patients with Systemic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases from the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology.

BACKGROUND: Serious infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease (SIRD) patients. Although vaccination may prevent numerous infections, vaccination uptake rates are low in this group of patients. OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations for vaccination in SIRD patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (until 31 October 2014) and EMBASE (until 14 December 2014) databases, as well as the ACR and EULAR congress abstracts (2011-2014). Patients with any systemic inflammatory rheumatic disease were included and all vaccines were considered. Any safety and efficacy outcomes were admitted. Search results were submitted to title and abstract selection, followed by detailed review of suitable studies. Data were subsequently pooled according to the type of vaccine and the SIRD considered. Results were presented and discussed by a multidisciplinary panel and systematic literature review (SLR)-derived recommendations were voted according to the Delphi method. The level of agreement among rheumatologists was assessed using an online survey. RESULTS: Eight general and seven vaccine-specific recommendations were formulated. Briefly, immunization status should routinely be assessed in all SIRD patients. The National Vaccination Program should be followed and some additional vaccines are recommended. To maximize the efficacy of vaccination, vaccines should preferably be administered 4 weeks before starting immunosuppression or, if possible when disease activity is controlled. Non-live vaccines are safe in SIRD, including immunosuppressed patients. The safety of live attenuated vaccines in immunosuppressed patients deserves further ascertainment, but might be considered in particular situations. DISCUSSION: The present recommendations combine scientific evidence with the multidisciplinary expertise of our taskforce panel and attained desirable agreement among Portuguese rheumatologists. Vaccination recommendations need to be updated on a regular basis, as more scientific data regarding vaccination efficacy and safety, emergent infectious threats, new vaccines as well as new immunomodulatory therapies become available.

Effect of Comedication With Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs on Retention of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Spondyloarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether use of comedication with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) influences the retention of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Patients with SpA from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register who started treatment with their first TNFi between 2001 and 2014 were included in this study. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of comedication with csDMARDs on TNFi retention in 2 types of models: a model in which baseline (time-fixed) variables were included, and a second model incorporating time-varying variables, including sociodemographic features, measures of disease activity, measures of physical function, and cotreatment with other drugs (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and oral steroids). To control for possible confounding by indication, the effect of csDMARD comedication on TNFi retention was also tested after adjustment for the treatment propensity score. RESULTS: In total, 954 patients were included in the study, of whom 289 (30.3%) discontinued treatment with their first TNFi after a median follow-up time of 2.5 years (range 0.08-13 years). Inefficacy was the most common reason for TNFi discontinuation (55.7% of patients). In the multivariable analyses, comedication with csDMARDs had no measurable effect on TNFi retention, neither in the baseline model (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.59-1.16) nor during follow-up in the model adjusted for time-varying covariates (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.68-1.68). The effect of csDMARD comedication remained nonsignificant after propensity score adjustment. CONCLUSION: Comedication with csDMARDs does not prolong TNFi retention in patients with SpA in clinical practice, suggesting that there is no benefit conferred by the concomitant use of these drugs.

SARCOSPA - Sarcopenia in spondyloarthritis patients.

INTRODUCTION: The loss of muscle mass (MM) is a serious problem which has been demonstrated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. There are few studies about the loss of MM in patients with spondyloarthritis (Spa). OBJECTIVE: To assess muscle mass index (MMI) in a cohort of patients with Spa and compare it with a control group of healthy individuals; to verify if a higher risk of sarcopenia is related with disease activity, functional impairment, duration of the illness and radiological damage. METHODS: Case control study. Muscle mass index (MMI) was determined, from the value of MM, using Lee's equation, in a cohort of patients with spondyloarthritis and in a control group. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity and Function Indexes (BASDAI and BASFI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) and Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) were assessed in a cohort of patients with axial Spa, as well as Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) in patients with peripheral disease. Data were treated using SPSS version 17.0. Values of p<0,05 were considered with statistical significance. RESULTS: 60 patients were enrolled; 48.2% were males, mean age 45.5±13.4 years, mean disease duration 10.9±11.6 years; 36 had ankylosing spondylitis and 24 had psoriatic arthritis. 62% of patients had sarcopenia and there was a significant difference in mean MMI between patients and controls (7.65±0.98 vs 8.25±0.92; p=0.001, OR =5.23. In male patients, there was a statistically significant moderate negative correlation between MMI and BASDAI and BASFI (p=-0.536 and p=-0.445). No other significant correlations were identified. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the hypothesis of a greater prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with Spa compared to healthy controls. Some limitations included the sample size, potential confounding factor such the bias of measurement and the use of a non-validated equation to Portuguese population to calculate MM.