Calcaneogenesis: the use of tibial bone transport for treatment of massively infected hindfoot defects.

Massive hindfoot defects which result after se- questrectomy of chronic osteomyelitis (COM) or Trauma or after tumors resection is a real challenge to the treating surgeons with either amputation or other reconstructive plastic procedures as the only available options, Calcaneal osteomyelitis is a major cause with classical surgical management to cure the infection has limited success in preservation of the hindfoot shape, function, and mechanical stability. The surgical procedure reported with the use of the Ilizarov apparatus for partial or total calcaneal OM is aimed to preserve the Hindfoot. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 10 patients which were treated by radical debridement of the infected area, Ilizarov frame application and arthrodesis with bone reconstruction by the Ilizarov apparatus using tibial transport for Hindfoot salvage. The mean age at presentation was 33.5 years (range; 24-57) and the mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range; 2-12).Patients clinical and radiographic data were assessed according to the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle- Hindfoot score. Results: The mean preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score was 48.3(range; 38-86) while the mean postoperative (AOFAS) was 58.5 (range; 45-73) , p value < 0.01 . Clinically all patients had anatomically stable feet with deformity correction and no signs of infection recurrence. Conclusion: The use of Ilizarov distal tibial bone transport to fill massive hindfoot defects proved to be a reliable method for elimination of infection and reconstruction of large defects without the need for bony or soft tissue plastic procedures. The technique also has the ability to produce a rigid limb fixation following debridement and to fill in massive hindfoot defects due to other etiologies as well.

Treatment of postoperative tibial chronic osteomyelitis using bone transport techniques; an observational study.

PURPOSE: Postoperative Tibial chronic osteomyelitis is one of the most challenging orthopaedic conditions especially when extensive, the anatomy of subcutaneous anteromedial part of the tibia with less soft tissue coverage complicates the situation. The extent of infected tibial part varies in size and duration from one patient to another. We report our experience using Bifocal and Monofocal bone transport techniques with regard to clinical outcome, recurrence of infection and re-fracture rate. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational review of 49 patients with postoperative Tibial chronic osteomyelitis which were treated using either Bifocal distraction compression BFDCO technique group I (31 patients) or Monofocal compression osteosynthesis MFCO technique Group II (18 patients). The average age of the patients was (41.6 ± 13.1 years), (range: 17-67 years). Leg length discrepancy was measured in 33 (58.9%) patients with an average of (1.4 ± 1.7 cm). Contracture of the ankle joint and equinus deformity were detected in 36 (64.3%) patients. Pre and Post-operative radiography together with Modified Irzhansky A.A et al. leg functional assessment system were used to assess the functional outcome. RESULTS: The time spent in the Ilizarov fixator (External Fixation Index) in the first group was (142 ± 72 days) and in the second group was (75 ± 54 days). The infection recurred in 2 patients (6%) in group I and in 5 patients (28%) in group II. Lack of consolidation or re-fracture within 6 months after the dismantling of the apparatus was detected in 6 patients (19.5%) in group I and in 5 patients (27.8%) in group II. Lack of consolidation or re-fracture within 6 months after dismantling of the apparatus in group I was detected in 6 patients (19.5%) in group I and in 5 patients (27.8%) in Group II. The average functional state score (AFSS) in the first group was (12.45 ± 2.41) on admission and increased to (16.16 ± 2.99) on the final follow-up which corresponded to a "good" result. In the second group II the AFSS was (12.11 ± 2.22) on admission and increased to (15.06 ± 2.88) at the final follow-up which corresponded to a "satisfactory" result. CONCLUSION: Treatment of Tibial chronic osteomyelitis using either Bifocal or Monofocal bone transport is an effective method. However our results have demonstrated better functional outcome and less infection recurrence and re-fracture rates when using the Bifocal distraction compression technique (BFDCO).