Perspectives of key decision makers on out-of-pocket payments for medicines in the Ethiopian healthcare system: a qualitative interview study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of key decision makers on out-of-pocket (OOP) payment for medicines and its implications in the Ethiopian healthcare system. DESIGN: A qualitative design that employed audiorecorded semistructured in-depth interviews was used in this study. The framework thematic analysis approach was followed in the analysis. SETTING: Interviewees came from five federal-level institutions engaged in policymaking (three) and tertiary referral-level healthcare service provision (two) in Ethiopia. PARTICIPANTS: Seven pharmacists, five health officers, one medical doctor and one economist who held key decision-making positions in their respective organisations participated in the study. RESULT: Three major themes were identified in the areas of the current context of OOP payment for medicines, its aggravating factors and a plan to reduce its burden. Under the current context, participants' overall opinions, circumstances of vulnerability and consequences on households were identified. Factors identified as aggravating the burden of OOP payment were deficiencies in the medicine supply chain and limitations in the health insurance system. Suggested mitigation strategies to be implemented by the health providers, the national medicines supplier, the insurance agency and the Ministry of Health were categorised under plans to reduce OOP payment. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that there is widespread OOP payment for medicines in Ethiopia. System level constraints such as weaknesses in the supply system at the national and health facility levels have been identified as critical factors that undermine the protective effects of health insurance in the Ethiopian context. Ensuring steady access to essential medicines requires addressing health system and supply constraints in addition to a well-functioning financial risk protection systems.

The financial burden of out of pocket payments on medicines among households in Ethiopia: analysis of trends and contributing factors.

BACKGROUND: In Ethiopia, out-of-pocket (OOP) payment is the key means of healthcare financing, and expenses on medicines are a crucial component of such payment. This study aims to investigate the financial implications of OOP payments on medicines for Ethiopian households. METHODS: The study involved a secondary data analysis of the national household consumption and expenditure surveys of 2010/11 and 2015/16. The "capacity-to-pay" method was used to calculate catastrophic OOP medicine expenditures. The extent of economic status related to catastrophic medicine payment inequity was calculated using concentration index estimation. The impoverishment consequences of OOP payment on medicine were estimated using poverty headcount and poverty gap analysis methods. Logistic regression models were used to identify the variables that predict catastrophic medicine payments. RESULTS: Medicines accounted for the majority of healthcare spending (> 65%) across the surveys. From 2010 to 2016, the total percentage of households facing catastrophic medicine payments decreased from 1% to 0.73%. However, the actual number of people expected to have experienced catastrophic medicine payments increased from 399,174 to 401,519 people. Payment for medicines pushed 11,132 households into poverty in 2015/16. The majority of disparities were explained by economic status, place of residence, and type of health services. CONCLUSION: OOP payment on medicine accounted for the majority of total health expenses in Ethiopia. A high medicine OOP payment continued to push households into catastrophic payments and impoverishment. Household seeking inpatient care, those with lower economic status and urban residents were among the most affected. Hence, innovative approaches to improve the supply of medicines in public facilities especially those in urban settings and risk protection mechanisms for medicine expenditures particularly for inpatient care are recommended.

Prevalence of hookworm infection and its association with anemia among patients visiting Fenan Medical Center, East Wollega Zone, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Data was obtained from all study subjects and blood and fecal specimen were collected from all subjects who apparently volunteer to take part in the study. OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence of hookworm infection and its association with anemia. METHODS.: A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to April 2007 in Diga District, East Wollega Zone. Hematocrit test was done on all blood samples. All stool specimens were processed with a Kato-thick method and examined for parasites and the density of parasites was determined as eggs per gram of stool (epg). Frequencies and proportions were used for the descriptive analysis of the data and Pearson Chi-square test was used to assess the associations between the demographic characteristics of the study subjects and the findings of the test samples. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of intestinal parasites was 64.9% Hookworm was the predominant (49.7%) intestinal parasite identified among the study participants. The density of hookworm egg ranged from 48 epg to 11,520 epg with mean and median values of 685 and 288 epg respectively. The observed result for hematocrit ranged from 12% to 50% with mean (SD) and median values of 34.6% (4.7) and 36% respectively. The prevalence of anemia is 65.5% among study participants. Among those subjects with hookworm, 83.9% were anemic. On the contrary only 41 (22.5%) study subjects who appeared negative for hookworm on stool examination were anemic. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of hookworm is higher and it is associated with anemia in East Wollega zone. Therefore intervention strategies should consider the concomitance of hookworm and anemia in the implementations of appropriate prevention and control strategies.