Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Headache ; 61(10): 1467-1474, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34806767

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Millions of patients present to US emergency departments (ED) annually for the treatment of migraine. First-line treatments, including metoclopramide, prochlorperazine, and sumatriptan, fail to provide sufficient relief in up to one-third of treated patients. In this narrative review, we discuss the evidence supporting the use of injectable (intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous) medications for patients in the ED who fail to improve sufficiently after treatment with first-line medication. METHODS: We used the American Headache Society's guideline, "Management of Adults with Acute Migraine in the Emergency Department: The American Headache Society Evidence Assessment of Parenteral Pharmacotherapies," published in 2016, to identify first-line medications for migraine. We then conducted a PubMed search to determine whether any evidence supported the use of these medications as second-line therapy and whether any evidence existed to support the use of injectable therapies not discussed in the guideline as second-line therapy. RESULTS: We identified only scant high-quality randomized data of second-line therapy. Therefore, we based our recommendations on medications that have reliably demonstrated efficacy as first-line treatment of migraine. These medications include injectable non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen. Dihydroergotamine and valproic acid have some data supporting efficacy. More recently, greater occipital nerve blocks (GONBs) have been shown to be efficacious. With the exception of meperidine, opioids have been shown to be not efficacious. Most data published to date demonstrate no role for propofol and ketamine. CONCLUSIONS: There are no evidence-based second-line treatments of migraine in the ED setting. For patients with migraine, who fail to improve after treatment with a first-line medication, it is reasonable to use an intravenous NSAID or intravenous acetaminophen. Alternatively, clinicians adept at performing a GONB may offer this treatment.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intravenosa , Humanos , Metoclopramida/uso terapêutico
2.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 37(4): 811-819, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563209

RESUMO

Emergency medicine providers may encounter serious GU conditions that need rapid diagnosis and early intervention to avoid severe life- and limb-threatening complications. A fundamental knowledge of several key procedural interventions is incredibly important to optimal patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/diagnóstico , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/patologia , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/patologia , Doenças dos Genitais Masculinos/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Urológicas/patologia , Doenças Urológicas/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...