Assessing ROSE for adequacy of EBUS-TBNA compared with a direct-to-cell block approach as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has been used during the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure as standard practice. Because of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, our institute had had to discontinue ROSE and adopt a direct-to-cell block approach. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether this change has had significant effects on the cytopathology quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1903 EBUS-TBNA cases from 734 patients were collected (1097 cases with ROSE for 452 patients; 806 cases without ROSE but with direct-to-cell block for 282 patients). The clinical and cytology data were analyzed using SAS, version 9.4, software to render calculated standardized residuals and a fitted multivariate generalized linear model. RESULTS: On average, a biopsy from a patient with ROSE was 0.936 (=exp -0.066) times less likely to be reported as satisfactory compared with a biopsy from a patient without ROSE, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.785). The inadequacy rate of EBUS-TBNA was 6.4% higher on average for cases with ROSE compared with a direct-to-cell block approach. However, this difference was also not statistically significant. The proportions of biopsies reported as diagnostic for malignancy and other were significantly different between the ROSE and no-ROSE groups with a standardized residual of 1.80 (P = 0.036) and -2.27 (P = 0.012), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuing ROSE and using a direct-to-cell block approach had no negative effects on cytopathology quality. This practice can be considered acceptable during the COVID-19 pandemic when social distancing and the shortage of staff and supplies have resulted in challenges to delivering quality care to cancer patients whose treatment cannot be postponed.

Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: cytologic characterization with histologic, immunohistologic, molecular, and clinical correlation of 8 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF) is an uncommon malignant fibroblastic neoplasm. The diagnosis is typically made on core needle biopsy or resection specimens. Cytomorphologic characterization of SEF has been limited to rare case reports in the literature. The goal of this study was to review a series of cases of SEF and to determine the feasibility of cytologic diagnosis of this rare tumor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight SEF cases from 2009 to 2019 were identified in a retrospective review of 3 participating institutions. Cytomorphologic and corresponding histologic, immunophenotypic, molecular, and clinical data were examined and described. RESULTS: Patients were of median age 41 years old at diagnosis with a median follow-up of 35.5 months. These tumors, with a median greatest dimension of 13.4 cm, were located in the lower extremities, abdomen, retroperitoneum, head, groin, sacrum, and lung. The tumor cells ranged from small round, medium-sized ovoid/short spindle, to epithelioid/plasmacytoid cells. A sclerotic, fibrous to myxoid stroma was seen. Most samples revealed low-grade cytology. Two cases showed tumor necrosis. Only 3 cases with cell block/positive MUC4 immunostain were diagnostic. Corresponding molecular testing for EWSR1 gene rearrangement and/or EWSR1-CREB3L1 fusion were positive in 5 of 8 cases on biopsy or surgical samples. An additional case was positive for FUS-CREB3L2 fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of SEF based solely upon cytologic features remains challenging. Epithelioid or plasmacytoid morphology mimics common malignancies. A supportive clinical history, MUC4 immunohistochemistry, and characteristic molecular result should be used to aid the diagnosis.