Visits to US emergency departments by 20- to 29-year-olds with toothache during 2001-2010.

BACKGROUND: Visits to emergency departments (EDs) for dental symptoms are on the rise, yet reliance on EDs for dental care is far from ideal. ED toothache visits represent opportunities to improve access to professional dental care. METHODS: This research focuses on 20- to 29-year-olds, who account for more ED toothache visits than do other age groups. The authors analyzed publicly available ED visit data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2001 through 2010. They assessed trends in ED toothache visit rates compared with back pain and all cause ED visits during the past decade. The authors used NHAMCS data for years 2009 and 2010 to characterize the more recent magnitude, relative frequency, and independent risk factors for ED toothache visits. Statistical analyses accounted for the complex sampling design. RESULTS: The average annual increase in ED visit rates among 20- to 29-year-olds during 2001-2010 was 6.1% for toothache, 0.3% for back pain, and 0.8% for all causes of ED visits. In 2009 and 2010, 20- to 29-year-olds made an estimated 1.27 million ED visits for toothaches and accounted for 42% of all ED toothache visits. Toothache was the fifth most common reason for any ED visit and third most common for uninsured ED visits by 20- to 29-year-olds. Independent risk factors for ED toothache visits were being uninsured or Medicaid-insured. CONCLUSIONS: Younger adults increasingly rely on EDs for toothaches-likely because of barriers to accessing professional dental care. Expanding dental coverage and access to affordable dental care could increase options for timely dental care and decrease ED use for dental symptoms. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Though additional research is needed to better understand why younger adults disproportionately use the ED for toothaches, findings from this study suggest the importance of maintaining access to a dental home from childhood through adolescence and subsequently into early adulthood.

Washington state foster care: dental utilization and expenditures.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with dental utilization and expenditures for children enrolled in Washington State (WA) foster care (FC). METHODS: This cross-sectional study used 2008 Medicaid enrollment and claims files for children ages <18 years enrolled in the WA FC program for ≥11 months (N = 10,177). Regression models were used to examine associations between utilization and expenditures and sex, race, age group, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) (i.e., disability), substance abuse, behavior problems, placement setting (Foster Home Care, Kinship Care, Group Care, Other), and urbanicity. RESULTS: Only 43 percent of the children utilized any dental care; the adjusted mean expenditure was $198.35 [95% confidence interval (CI) $181.35, $215.36]. Fewer utilized diagnostic (41 percent), preventive (39 percent), restorative (11 percent), or complex (5 percent) services. Associated with utilization (P ≤ 0.01) were: female [ARR = 1.05, 95% CI(1.01, 1.10)]; 0-2 years [ARR = 0.18, 95% CI(0.15, 0.21)], [3-5 years ARR = 0.78, 95% CI(0.74, 0.83)]; Native American [ARR = 0.85, 95% CI(0.80, 0.91)]; SSI [ARR = 1.10, 95% CI(1.04, 1.17)]; Kinship Care [ARR = 0.94, 95% CI(0.90, 0.98)]; Group Care [ARR = 1.25 95% CI(1.15, 1.37)]; and urban/rural urbanicity with population <20 K [ARR = 1.20 95% CI(1.12, 1.30)]. Associated with expenditures (P < 0.05) were: ages 0-2 years [-$153.66, 95% CI(-$168.33, -$139.00)], 3-5 years [-$98.71, 95% CI(-$116.78, -$80.65)], 6-11 years [-$16.83 95% CI(-$33.52, -$0.14)]; African American [-$32.05 95% CI(-$47.99, -$16.12)]; Kinship Care [$28.57 95% CI($14.00, $43.15)]. CONCLUSIONS: Most children enrolled in WA FC for ≥11 months during 2008 did not receive dental care. Research is needed to determine the level of unmet need among children in FC and interventions to improve access to oral health of the children. Enforcement of existing federal legislation is needed.

The dentist's role in promoting community water fluoridation: a call to action for dentists and educators.

BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: Community water fluoridation is an important public health intervention that reduces oral health disparities and increases the health of the population. Promotion of its safety and effectiveness is critical to maintaining its widespread acceptance and ensuring its continued use. Dentists are a potentially important source of knowledge regarding the oral health benefits and safety of water fluoridation. However, few dentists regularly discuss fluorides, and water fluoridation in particular, with patients. The authors aim to describe and discuss the role and importance of dentists' promotion of public water fluoridation, barriers to dentists' involvement and some approaches that might influence dentists to promote water fluoridation more actively. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Ongoing promotion of fluoridation by dentists is a key factor in ensuring sustained municipal water fluoridation. However, current undergraduate dental curricula do not adequately prepare dentists for this role, and continuing dental education may be insufficient to change clinical practice. Although smoking-cessation literature can shed some light on how to proceed, changing dentists' practice behavior remains a largely unstudied topic. Dental associations are a key resource for dentists, providing information that can assist them in becoming advocates for water fluoridation.