Socio-economic status and functioning in patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder and their unaffected siblings - Results from a cross-sectional clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported socio-economic status and functioning in patients newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) and their unaffected siblings (US). METHODS: Socio-economic status and functioning were compared in a cross-sectional clinical study including 382 patients newly diagnosed with BD, 129 of their US, and 200 healthy control individuals (HC). RESULTS: Socio-economic status was lower in patients newly diagnosed with BD compared with HC within educational achievement, employment status, workability and relationship status (p < 0.001, OR between 0.02 and 0.53). Regarding US and HC, US had lower educational achievement (p < 0.001, OR = 0.27 [0.16; 0.46]), as the only affected socio-economic outcome. Functioning was substantially impaired according to the Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST) (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 2.12) and Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 2.76) in patients newly diagnosed with BD compared with HC. US expressed the same pattern with impaired overall functioning. Within patients, the impaired functioning was associated with a longer illness duration. LIMITATIONS: Patients had an illness duration of 10.5 [IQR: 6.1; 16.2] years, even though they were included shortly after a diagnosis of BD (0.3 [IQR: 0.1; 0.7] years), highlighting the obstacles of research in illness onset of BD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients newly diagnosed with BD, and to a lesser degree their US, exhibit lower socio-economic status and impaired overall functioning. These findings emphasise the importance of early diagnosis, treatment and focus on functional recovery and stress that intervention strategies and further research in high-risk individuals are needed.

The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment on the rate and duration of psychiatric readmission in patients with unipolar depressive disorder: The RADMIS randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unipolar depressive disorder are frequently hospitalized, and the period following discharge is a high-risk-period. Smartphone-based treatments are receiving increasing attention among researchers, clinicians, and patients. We aimed to investigate whether a smartphone-based monitoring and treatment system reduces the rate and duration of readmissions, more than standard treatment, in patients with unipolar depressive disorder following hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, investigator-blinded, randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received a smartphone-based monitoring and treatment system in addition to standard treatment. The system allowed patients to self-monitor symptoms and access psycho-educative information and cognitive modules. The patients were allocated a study-nurse who, based on the monitoring data, guided and supported them. The control group received standard treatment. The trial lasted six months, with outcome assessments at 0, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: We included 120 patients with unipolar depressive disorder (ICD-10). Intention-to-treat analyses showed no statistically significant differences in time to readmission (Log-Rank p=0.9) or duration of readmissions (B=-16.41,95%CI:-47.32;25.5,p=0.3) (Primary outcomes). There were no differences in clinically rated depressive symptoms (p=0.6) or functioning (p=0.1) (secondary outcomes). The intervention group had higher levels of recovery (B=7,29, 95%CI:0.82;13,75,p=0.028) and a tendency towards higher quality of life (p=0.07), wellbeing (p=0,09) satisfaction with treatment (p=0.05) and behavioral activation (p=0.08) compared with the control group (tertiary outcomes). LIMITATIONS: Patients and study-nurses were unblinded to allocation. CONCLUSIONS: We found no effect of the intervention on primary or secondary outcomes. In tertiary outcomes, patients in the intervention group reported higher levels of recovery compared to the control group.

Mood, activity, and sleep measured via daily smartphone-based self-monitoring in young patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder, their unaffected relatives and healthy control individuals.

Diagnostic evaluations and early interventions of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) rely on clinical evaluations. Smartphones have been proposed to facilitate continuous and fine-grained self-monitoring of symptoms. The present study aimed to (1) validate daily smartphone-based self-monitored mood, activity, and sleep, against validated questionnaires and clinical ratings in young patients with newly diagnosed BD, unaffected relatives (UR), and healthy controls persons (HC); (2) investigate differences in daily smartphone-based self-monitored mood, activity, and sleep in young patients with newly diagnosed BD, UR, and HC; (3) investigate associations between self-monitored mood and self-monitored activity and sleep, respectively, in young patients with newly diagnosed BD. 105 young patients with newly diagnosed BD, 24 UR and 77 HC self-monitored 2 to 1077 days (median [IQR] = 65 [17.5-112.5]). There was a statistically significantly negative association between the mood item on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and smartphone-based self-monitored mood (B = - 0.76, 95% CI - 0.91; - 0.63, p < 0.001) and between psychomotor item on HAMD and self-monitored activity (B = - 0.44, 95% CI - 0.63; - 0.25, p < 0.001). Smartphone-based self-monitored mood differed between young patients with newly diagnosed BD and HC (p < 0.001), and between UR and HC (p = 0.008) and was positively associated with smartphone-based self-reported activity (p < 0.001) and sleep duration (p < 0.001). The findings support the potential of smartphone-based self-monitoring of mood and activity as part of a biomarker for young patients with BD and UR. Smartphone-based self-monitored mood is better to discriminate between young patients with newly diagnosed BD and HC, and between UR and HC, compared with smartphone-based activity and sleep.Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT0288826.

Aberrant cognition in newly diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder and their unaffected relatives.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) experience persistent impairments in both affective and non-affective cognitive function, which is associated with a worse course of illness and poor functional outcomes. Nevertheless, the temporal progression of cognitive dysfunction in BD remains unclear and the identification of objective endophenotypes can inform the aetiology of BD. METHODS: The present study is a cross-sectional investigation of cognitive baseline data from the longitudinal Bipolar Illness Onset-study. One hundred seventy-two remitted patients newly diagnosed with BD, 52 of their unaffected relatives (UR), and 110 healthy controls (HC) were compared on a large battery of behavioural cognitive tasks tapping into non-affective (i.e. neurocognitive) and affective (i.e. emotion processing and regulation) cognition. RESULTS: Relative to HCs, patients with BD exhibited global neurocognitive deficits (ps < 0.001), as well as aberrant emotion processing and regulation (ps ⩽ 0.011); including decreased emotional reactivity to positive social scenarios, impaired ability to down-regulate positive emotion, as well as a specific deficit in the ability to recognise surprised facial expressions. Their URs also showed a trend towards difficulties identifying surprised faces (p = 0.075). No other differences in cognitive function were found for URs compared to HCs. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive deficits and impairments within emotion processing and regulation may be illness-related deficits of BD that present after illness-onset, whereas processing of emotional faces may represent an early risk marker of BD. However, longitudinal studies are needed to examine the association between cognitive impairments and illness progression in BD.