Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 41(14): 2040-59, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16125929

RESUMO

A systematic meta-analysis of observational studies of melanoma and family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors was conducted as part of a comprehensive meta-analysis of all major risk factors for melanoma. Following a systematic literature search, relative risks were extracted from 60 studies published before September 2002. Fixed and random effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates for family history (RR = 1.74, 1.41-2.14), skin type (I vs. IV: RR = 2.09, 1.67-2.58), high density of freckles (RR = 2.10, 1.80-2.45), skin colour (Fair vs. Dark: RR = 2.06, 1.68-2.52), eye colour (Blue vs. Dark: RR = 1.47, 1.28-1.69) and hair colour (Red vs. Dark: RR = 3.64, 2.56-5.37), pre-malignant and skin cancer lesions (RR = 4.28, 2.80-6.55) and actinic damage indicators (RR = 2.02, 1.24-3.29). Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were carried out to explore sources of between-study variation and bias. Sensitivity analyses investigated reliability of results and publication bias. Latitude and adjustment for phenotype were two study characteristics that significantly influenced the estimates.


Assuntos
Melanoma/genética , Neoplasias Cutâneas/genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Linhagem , Fenótipo , Fatores de Risco , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 41(1): 28-44, 2005 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15617989

RESUMO

A systematic meta-analysis of observational studies of melanoma and one of the most important risk factors, the number of naevi, was conducted in order to clarify aspects of the aetiology of this disease. Following a systematic literature search, relative risks (RRs) were extracted from 46 studies published before September 2002. Dose-response random effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates. Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were carried out to explore sources of between-study variation and bias. Sensitivity analyses investigated the reliability of the results and any publication bias. Number of common naevi was confirmed an important risk factor with a substantially increased risk associated with the presence of 101-120 naevi compared with <15 (pooled Relative Risk (RR) = 6.89; 95% Confidential Interval (CI): 4.63, 10.25) as was the number of atypical naevi (RR = 6.36 95%; CI: 3.80, 10.33; for 5 versus 0). The type of study and source of cases and controls were two study characteristics that significantly influenced the estimates. Case-control studies, in particular when the hospital was the source for cases or controls, appeared to present much lower and more precise estimates than cohort studies.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Nevo Displásico/patologia , Melanoma/patologia , Nevo/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Síndrome do Nevo Displásico/etiologia , Humanos , Melanoma/etiologia , Nevo/etiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia
3.
Eur J Cancer ; 41(1): 45-60, 2005 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15617990

RESUMO

A systematic revision of the literature was conducted in order to undertake a comprehensive meta-analysis of all published observational studies on melanoma. An extensive analysis of the inconsistencies and variability in the estimates was performed to provide some clues about its Epidemiology. Following a systematic literature search, relative risks (RRs) for sun exposure were extracted from 57 studies published before September 2002. Intermittent sun exposure and sunburn history were shown to play considerable roles as risk factors for melanoma, whereas a high occupational sun exposure seemed to be inversely associated to melanoma. The country of study and adjustment of the estimates adjuste for phenotype and photo-type were significantly associated with the variability of the intermittent sun exposure estimates (P = 0.024, 0.003 and 0.030, respectively). For chronic sun exposure, inclusion of controls with dermatological diseases and latitude resulted in significantly different data (P = 0.05 and 0.031, respectively). Latitude was also shown to be important (P = 0.031) for a history of sunburn; studies conducted at higher latitudes presented higher risks for a history of sunburns. Role of country, inclusion of controls with dermatological diseases and other study features seemed to suggest that "well conducted" studies supported the intermittent sun exposure hypothesis: a positive association for intermittent sun exposure and an inverse association with a high continuous pattern of sun exposure.


Assuntos
Melanoma/etiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Doença Crônica , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Queimadura Solar/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...