Risk factors for the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in a large animal model.

A high incidence of a post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is observed in miniature swine conditioned for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using a protocol involving T-cell depletion and cyclosporine therapy. This study was designed to assess contributing factors to disease development. Forty-six animals were studied including 12 (26%) that developed PTLD. A number of risk factors for PTLD were examined, including degree of immunosuppression, degree of MHC mismatch and infection by a porcine lymphotrophic herpesvirus (PLHV-1). Flow cytometry was used to measure host and donor T- and B-cell levels in the peripheral blood. Porcine lymphotrophic herpesvirus viral load was determined by quantitative PCR. Animals developing PTLD had significantly lower levels of T cells on the day of transplant. Cyclosporine levels did not differ significantly between animals with and without PTLD. Animals receiving transplants across a two-haplotype mismatch barrier showed an increased incidence of PTLD. All animals with PTLD had significant increases in PLHV-1 viral loads. Porcine lymphotrophic herpesvirus viral copy numbers remained at low levels in the absence of disease. The availability of a preclinical large-animal model with similarities to PTLD of humans may allow studies of the pathogenesis and treatment of that disorder.

Tolerance to composite tissue allografts across a major histocompatibility barrier in miniature swine.

BACKGROUND: Tolerance to composite tissue allografts might allow the widespread clinical use of reconstructive allotransplantation if protocols to achieve this could be rendered sufficiently nontoxic. The authors investigated whether tolerance could be generated in miniature swine to composite tissue allografts across a major histocompatibility (MHC) barrier. A clinically relevant tolerance protocol involving hematopoietic cell transplantation without the need for irradiation or myelosuppressive drugs was tested. METHODS: Seven recipient animals were transiently T-cell depleted and a short course of cyclosporine was initiated. Twenty-four hours later, a donor hematopoietic cell transplant consisting of cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells or bone marrow cells and a heterotopic limb transplant were performed. In vitro anti-donor responsiveness was assessed by mixed-lymphocyte reaction and cell-mediated lympholysis assays. Acceptance of the limb allografts was determined by gross and histologic appearance. Chimerism in the peripheral blood and lymphohematopoietic organs was assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: All seven experimental animals accepted the musculoskeletal elements but rejected the skin of the allografts. All but one of the animals displayed donor-specific unresponsiveness in vitro. The animals that received cytokine mobilized-peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed chimerism but had clinical evidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). None of the animals that received bone marrow cells showed stable chimerism and none developed GVHD. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol can achieve tolerance to the musculoskeletal elements of composite tissue allografts across an MHC barrier in miniature swine. Stable chimerism does not appear to be necessary for tolerance and may not be desirable because of the risk of GVHD.

Variable relationship between chimerism and tolerance after hematopoietic cell transplantation without myelosuppressive conditioning.

BACKGROUND: We have previously described a mixed chimerism protocol that avoids myelosuppressive conditioning and permits hematopoietic cell transplantation across MHC barriers without the need for whole body irradiation in miniature swine. Here, we report our current experience including animals conditioned without thymic irradiation, and we attempt to define the relationship between long-term chimerism and stable tolerance in these animals. METHODS: Recipient swine received in vivo T-cell depletion, with or without thymic irradiation on day -2. Cyclosporine was administered for 30 to 60 days beginning on day -1. A total of 1 to 2 x 10(10) /kg cytokine-mobilized donor hematopoietic cells were infused during 3 days. Chimerism was determined by flow cytometry. In vitro tolerance assays and donor-matched kidney transplantation were performed after cessation of cyclosporine. RESULTS: Most recipients maintained stable chimerism (26 of 35) and were specifically tolerant to donor-matched cells in vitro regardless of whether they received thymic irradiation. Donor-matched kidney transplantations performed in chimeric animals without in vitro antidonor immune responses were accepted without immunosuppression. Some animals developed in vitro evidence of antidonor MHC responsiveness despite the persistence of donor cells in the peripheral blood. Donor-matched kidney transplantations performed in the face of these responses were rejected. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that this nonmyelosuppressive protocol can induce stable chimerism and robust tolerance even in animals conditioned without thymic irradiation. However, the data also demonstrate that macrochimerism does not always correlate with tolerance. Lack of in vitro antidonor immune responses in chimeric animals is an important predictor of renal allograft acceptance in this model.

Persistent chimerism despite antidonor MHC in vitro responses in miniature swine following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: T-cell chimerism predominates in miniature swine receiving hematopoietic-cell transplantation without myelosuppressive conditioning. Several chimeric recipients have become hyporesponsive to donor-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in vitro and accepted donor-matched renal transplants without immunosuppression. However, some retained antidonor in vitro responses and subsequently rejected donor renal allografts despite the persistence of peripheral blood chimerism. In this study, we characterize the donor cells in both "tolerant" and "nontolerant" chimeric miniature swine. METHODS: Peripheral blood chimerism was determined by flow cytometry. In vitro antidonor responsiveness was determined by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and cell-mediated lymphocytotoxicity (CML). Donor cells were separated from chimeras by immunomagnetic bead separation and used as stimulators or targets in CML assays. Phenotypic analysis of donor cells in chimeras was performed using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Peripheral blood chimerism stabilized beyond 100 days and was made up almost entirely of T cells. PBMC from nontolerant chimeras could be stimulated in vitro to kill donor cells isolated from the mixed chimera itself. In contrast, PBMC from tolerant chimeras hyporesponsive to donor-type cells could not be stimulated in vitro to kill their own sorted donor cells. CONCLUSIONS: The in vivo persistence of donor T cells in mixed chimeric animals with in vitro antidonor responsiveness is not caused by an inability of these cells to be killed but rather by the poor stimulating capacity of these donor T cells. The nature of donor T cells that persist in the face of in vitro antidonor responses, has important implications for the induction of transplant tolerance by way of the generation of mixed chimerism.