Using Virtual Reality to Teach Medical Students Cross-Coverage Skills.

BACKGROUND: Recognizing and attempting management of patients with urgent or emergent conditions is one of the Association of American Medical Colleges Core Entrustable Professional Activities (#10) and a skill desired of new interns. However, given the acuity of these patient conditions, medical students often struggle to gain experience in these situations. Virtual reality could help fill this void while lowering costs and resources compared with high-fidelity simulation. METHODS: We converted a high-fidelity chest pain simulation case to virtual reality format utilizing short video clips filmed with a 360-degree camera and superimposed menus of options at decision points. This virtual reality simulation was offered to fourth-year medical students during their transition to residency course in the spring of 2023. Students were offered a post-survey on the simulation. RESULTS: There were 47 fourth-year students that completed the virtual reality simulation; 41 completed the post-survey (response rate 87.2%). Over 90% of the students agreed or strongly agreed with the following statements: the virtual reality simulation was a valuable part of the transition to residency course, the virtual reality case was similar to what they will face as an intern, and they would like to have more virtual reality simulations earlier in the fourth year; 85.4% agreed or strongly agreed that the virtual reality simulation helped prepare them for the first few days of intern year. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that virtual reality is an acceptable, cost-effective, and feasible modality to teach medical students how to recognize and attempt management of urgent clinical situations (Core Entrustable Professional Activity 10).

Competency-based assessment of procedural skills in resident training.

BACKGROUND: No standardized summative tools exist to assess competency in bedside procedures or provide residents and programs with summative feedback. OBJECTIVE: To provide competency-based procedure training and feedback to residents, we created a procedure competency committee (PCC). Here, we describe the PCC process, its impact on procedure training, and examine residents' attainment of competency in bedside procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The PCC consisted of hospitalists and met twice annually to review resident procedure portfolios for three academic years 2019-2022 at a university-based internal medicine residency program. Residents were designated to one of the five competency levels; being able to participate, perform under supervision with assistance, perform under direct supervision (DS) without assistance, perform independently with indirect supervision (IS), and perform independently with IS and supervise others. We analyzed the probability of advancing competency levels with each additional procedure using multinomial logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 97 residents, 48 (49.5%) were women and 60 (62%) subsequently matched in procedure-oriented fields. More residents achieved IS level for paracentesis than for lumbar puncture (LP) or central venous catheterization (CVC) (62 vs. 25 and 37, respectively; p < .001). Each incremental procedure performed was associated with a higher chance of being advanced to IS group from the DS group; 1.31 times for paracentesis (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07, 1.60; p < .008), 1.83 times for LP (95% CI = 1.35, 2.47; p = .0001), and two times for CVC (95% CI = 1.32, 3.05; p = .001). CONCLUSION: The PCC provided competency-based assessment of a resident's procedural skills and may be used to assess the impact of curriculum changes.