Cancer patients as 'experts' in defining quality of life domains. A multicentre survey by the Italian Group for the Evaluation of Outcomes in Oncology (IGEO).

Although the subjective nature of quality of life is generally accepted, less attention has been paid to the procedure of selecting domains to be explored with questionnaires. To explore what contributes to cancer patients' quality of life, a survey was conducted with the aim of identifying contents of quality of life using cancer patients as 'experts'. A questionnaire with open-ended items aimed at exploring the meaning of quality of life and at determining the contents of health and not health related quality of life, was submitted to a sample of cancer patients stratified by residence, cancer site and stage of disease. The 248 questionnaires received were transcribed and broken down into phrases to allow coding. A content analysis was performed, using as a conceptual framework, the domains identified by the Italian Society of Psycho-Oncology. Overall, 43 domains and a list of symptoms were identified. The two most frequently reported symptoms were pain (21.4% patients) and fatigue (14.1% patients). Social relationships and psychological domains were heavily represented. Twenty sub-domains related to the domain 'psychological well-being'. This study suggests that information on the content of quality of life questionnaires to be submitted to people affected by a specific disease, should be derived by studying people suffering the specific disease. These results reinforce the criticism that available quality of life instruments are more likely to reflect the perspective of health professionals than patients.

[Evaluation of quality of life in oncology. Rationale and objectives of the first phase of the Quality of Life in Oncology project]. / La valutazione della qualità di vita in oncologia. Razionale ed obiettivi della prima fase del progetto QvOnc.

Although the subjective nature of quality of life perception is generally accepted, less attention has been paid to the procedure of selecting domains to be explored with questionnaires. In most cases domains are selected by panel of experts. It is not known whether these domains are relevant for the patients. Moreover, questionnaires developed in 'foreign' countries may not be culturally sound or relevant for patients living in different cultural background. In order to explore what really contributes to quality of life of Italian patients, a survey was conducted with the aim of identifying any dimension of quality of life, positively or negatively impacted on from the illness and therapies. A sample of two hundred and eighty eight cancer patients with previously specified characteristics (primary tumor, stage of disease and place of residence) were identified. After consenting to partecipate to the study, a staff member (a physician, a nurse or a psychologist) asked the patient to complete an open-ended questionnaire in the out-patient clinic or at home. This questionnaire, partially derived from a study by Padilla et al. made up of 5 questions: 'What does the term quality of life mean to you?', 'What contributes to a good quality of life?', 'What contributes to a poor or bad quality of life?', 'Which either physical or psychological symptom interferes with your quality of life?', 'State any positive or negative change in your quality of life, due to illness or treatments'. The first question was asked to explore the meaning of quality of life for the patient; the second and third question were asked to determine the contents of quality of life not health related; the fourth question and the diary provided information about quality of life contents related to his own experience of disease. Two hundred and forty eight questionnaires (86.1%) were obtained from 7 Cancer Centres participating to the study (Genova, Milano, Roma, Perugia, Napoli, Cagliari, Palermo). All the questionnaires were transcribed and subsequently broken down in phrases on a form that allowed coding. Three raters (a research nurse, an oncologist and a clinical psychologist) made the content analysis using as conceptual framework the list of domains identified by the Italian Society of Psycho-Oncology. The present study shows the possibility to define the content domain of quality of life attributes for cancer patients, using patients as experts.

Psychosocial adaptation after liver transplantation with particular reference to recipients aware of their cancer.

This study investigated the Psychosocial adjustment in 40 patients who received orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for several endstage liver diseases. Twenty patients were grafted because they suffered from liver Cancer as well as cirrhosis. Particular attention was paid to evaluating whether cancer could affect recipients' coping with transplant. Each patient underwent a semi-structured interview to obtain information on their psychosocial life, relationship with the donor, organ acceptance and life expectancy. Interview was performed I year after transplantation. A psychodiagnostic evaluation was also performed using a Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and a Human Figure Test. Psychosocial adaptation in everyday life following liver transplantation seemed good in most of the patients, whatever the indication for transplantation might be. It can he seen that by replacing the diseased organ a high percentage of oncological patients overcame their fear of cancer.

A therapy impact questionnaire for quality-of-life assessment in advanced cancer research.

The first part of the validation procedure used for a Therapy Impact Questionnaire (TIQ) on quality-of-life assessment in advanced cancer patients is described. The TIQ is composed of 36 items which assess both disease and therapy impact according to four dimensions that operationally define quality of life: physical symptoms (24 items), functional status (3 items), concomitant emotional and cognitive factors (6 items) and social interaction (2 items). A global judgement expressed as "have you been feeling ill" further completes the TIQ. Patients answered each question using a 4-point verbal Likert scale: not at all, slight, a lot and very much. The TIQ was given to 1,000 consecutive patients who were no longer responsive to cancer treatment and presented symptoms due to disease progression. The compliance rate was quite high (87%). Results of confirmatory factor analysis were consistent with the operational dimensions identified during questionnaire construction. In particular, the dichotomized answers to 3 functional status items could be used as a Guttman scale. In a sub-sample of 50 patients, the reproducibility of functional status items was assessed using a 7-item parallel form. The intraclass correlation coefficient obtained indicated a reasonably high reproducibility. On the basis of the analyses conducted, the TIQ appears to be a reliable and concise instrument for studies aimed to assess the effectiveness of therapies in advanced cancer patients.