New N-Adducts of Thiadiazole and Thiazoline with Levoglucosenone and Evaluation of Their Significant Cytotoxic (Anti-Cancer) Activity.

The conjugate N-adducts of thio-1,3,4-diazole and 2-thiazoline with levoglucosenone were synthesized via a stereoselective, base-catalyzed conjugate N-Michael addition to levoglucosenone at C-4. Structural assignments were established using 1H and 13C NMR analysis, and X-ray single-crystal analysis for one of the compounds. The biological properties of the novel compounds were tested on a cell model. Cytotoxicity was analyzed via colorimetric assay. Two distinct types of cell death, apoptosis and necrosis, were analyzed by determining the phosphatidylserine levels from the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, caspase activation, and lactate dehydrogenase release. We also evaluated DNA damage using an alkaline comet assay. The level of oxidative stress was measured with a modified comet assay and an H2DCFDA probe. The thio-1,3,4-diazole adduct (FCP23) and the 2-thiazoline adduct (FCP26) exhibit similar cytotoxicity values for cancer cells (ovarian (A2780), breast (MCF-7), cervix (HeLa), colon (LoVo), and brain (MO59J and MO59K)), but their mechanism of action is drastically different. While FCP23 induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and necrosis, FCP26 induces apoptosis through caspase activation.

New syntheses of thiosaccharides utilizing substitution reactions.

Novel synthetic methods published since 2005 affording carbohydrates containing sulfur atom(s) are reviewed. The review is divided to subchapters based on the position of sulfur atom(s) in the sugar molecule. Only those methods that take advantage of substitution are discussed.

Analytical Methods for Oxalate Quantification: The Ubiquitous Organic Anion.

Oxalate is a divalent organic anion that affects many biological and commercial processes. It is derived from plant sources, such as spinach, rhubarb, tea, cacao, nuts, and beans, and therefore is commonly found in raw or processed food products. Oxalate can also be made endogenously by humans and other mammals as a byproduct of hepatic enzymatic reactions. It is theorized that plants use oxalate to store calcium and protect against herbivory. Clinically, oxalate is best known to be a major component of kidney stones, which commonly contain calcium oxalate crystals. Oxalate can induce an inflammatory response that decreases the immune system's ability to remove renal crystals. When formulated with platinum as oxaliplatin (an anticancer drug), oxalate has been proposed to cause neurotoxicity and nerve pain. There are many sectors of industry that are hampered by oxalate, and others that depend on it. For example, calcium oxalate is troublesome in the pulp industry and the alumina industry as it deposits on machinery. On the other hand, oxalate is a common active component of rust removal and cleaning products. Due to its ubiquity, there is interest in developing efficient methods to quantify oxalate. Over the past four decades, many diverse methods have been reported. These approaches include electrochemical detection, liquid chromatography or gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, enzymatic degradation of oxalate with oxalate oxidase and detection of hydrogen peroxide produced, and indicator displacement-based methods employing fluorescent or UV light-absorbing compounds. Enhancements in sensitivity have been reported for both electrochemical and mass-spectrometry-based methods as recently as this year. Indicator-based methods have realized a surge in interest that continues to date. The diversity of these approaches, in terms of instrumentation, sample preparation, and sensitivity, has made it clear that no single method will work best for every purpose. This review describes the strengths and limitations of each method, and may serve as a reference for investigators to decide which approach is most suitable for their work.

A Copper(II) Macrocycle Complex for Sensing Biologically Relevant Organic Anions in a Competitive Fluorescence Assay: Oxalate Sensor or Urate Sensor?

Fluorescence sensing of oxalate has garnered some attention in the past two decades as a result of this anion's prominence and impact on society. Previous work on oxalate sensors and other divalent anion sensors has led to the conclusion that the sensors are selective for the anion under investigation. However, sensor selectivity is often determined by testing against a relatively small array of "guest" molecules or analytes and studies often exclude potentially interfering compounds. For example, studies on oxalate sensors have excluded compounds such as citrate and urate, which are anions in the biological matrices where oxalate is measured (e.g., urine, blood, and bacterial lysate). In the present study, we reassessed the selectivity of a dinuclear copper(II) macrocycle (Cu2L) in an eosin Y displacement assay using biologically relevant anions. Although previously reported as selective for oxalate, we found greater indicator displacement (fluorescence response) for urate and oxaloacetate and a significant response to citrate. These anions are larger than oxalate and do not appear to fit into the putative binding pocket of Cu2L. Consistent with previous reports, Cu2L did not release eosin Y in the presence of several other dicarboxylates, including adipate, glutarate, malate (except at 10 mM), fumarate, succinate, or malonate (except at 10 mM), and the monocarboxylate acetate. This was demonstrated by the failure of the anions to reverse eosin Y quenching by Cu2L. We also assessed, for the first time, other monocarboxylates, including butyrate, pyruvate, lactate, propionate, and formate. None of these anions were able to displace eosin Y, indicating no interaction with Cu2L that interfered with the eosin Y binding site. Single-crystal X-ray crystallography revealed that nonselective binding of the anions is likely partly caused by readily accessible copper(II) ions on the external surface of Cu2L. In addition, π-π stacking of urate with the aromatic groups of Cu2L cannot be ruled out as a contributor to binding. We conclude that Cu2L is not suitable for oxalate sensing in a biological matrix unless interfering compounds are selectively removed or masked.