Consideration of T-cell profile in the examination of statin efficacy in inflammatory diseases, neurodegeneration, and neurocognitive performance.

Statins are a cornerstone in the medical management of cardiovascular disease, yet their efficacy varies greatly between individuals. In this commentary, we outline evidence for the role of CD4+CD28null T-cell expansion as a critical moderator of the effects of statins in preventing cardiovascular events via the reduction of pathological inflammation. Given this relationship, we argue that T-cell profiles should be considered as a patient characteristic in clinical and pre-clinical studies examining statin efficacy in other age- and inflammation-related pathologies. We discuss the implications this may have for studies of statin use in numerous disease processes - notably, dementia and neurocognitive dysfunction - and the potential for T-cell profiles to be used as a prognosticator for statin efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, and multiple sclerosis.

Effects of metacognitive training (MCT) on social cognition for schizophrenia spectrum and related psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum and related psychotic disorders (SSD) experience significant impairments in social cognition that impede functioning. Social cognition is a multidimensional construct consisting of four domains: 1. theory of mind, 2. emotion processing, 3. attributional style and 4. social perception. Metacognitive training (MCT) is an intervention designed to target cognitive biases in psychosis containing two modules addressing social cognition. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of MCT on social cognition and two of its domains: theory of mind and emotion processing. Ten electronic databases were scoured from 2007 to 1 February 2022 for MCT studies reporting social cognition outcomes for people with SSD (1050 identified, 282 assessed). Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d in R. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis (nMCT = 212, ncontrol = 194). MCT had a small but positive effect on global social cognition (d = 0.28 [95% CI 0.07-0.49]) and theory of mind (d = 0.27 [95% CI 0.01-0.52]). MCT showed no evidence of an effect on emotion processing (d = 0.03 [95% CI -0.26 to 0.32]). CONCLUSION: MCT has a small but significant effect on social cognition for people with SSD. Our results add to other recent meta-analyses showing significant effects of MCT on clinically relevant outcomes such as positive symptoms, cognitive biases and cognitive insight. We recommend that future studies on MCT report outcomes on all four domains of social cognition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (in the process of registration) available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails.

C-Reactive protein and cognition: Mediation analyses with brain morphology in the UK Biobank.

Cognitive impairments and abnormal immune activity are both associated with various clinical disorders. The association between C-Reactive protein (CRP), a marker associated with inflammation, and cognitive performance remains unclear. Further, mechanisms potentially linking CRP to cognition are not yet established. Brain structure may well mediate this relationship: immune processes play crucial roles in shaping and maintaining brain structure, with brain structure and function driving cognition. The United Kingdom Biobank (UKBB) is a large cohort study with extensive assessments, including high-sensitivity serum CRP levels, brain imaging, and various cognitive tasks. With data from 39,200 UKBB participants, we aimed first to determine the relationship between CRP and cognitive performance, and second, to assess metrics of brain morphology as potential mediators in this relationship. Participants were aged 40 to 70 at initial assessment and were mostly Caucasian. After accounting for potential covariates (e.g., age, sex, medical diagnoses, use of selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors), we found CRP levels to have small, negative associations with fluid intelligence (b = -0.03, 95%CI[-0.05,-0.02], t(14381) = -3.62, pcor = .004), and numeric memory (b = -0.03, 95%CI[-0.05,-0.01], t(14366) = -3.31, pcor = .007). We found no evidence of brain morphology mediating these relationships (all |ab| < 0.001, all pcor > .55). Our findings from this large sample suggest that serum-assessed CRP is of marginal importance for cognitive performance in mid-to-late aged Caucasians; the small effect sizes of statistically significant associations provide context to previous inconsistent results. The seeming lack of involvement of brain morphology suggests that other brain metrics (e.g., connectivity, functional activation) may be more pertinent to this relationship. Future work should also consider CRP levels measured in the central nervous system and/or other cytokines that may better predict cognitive performance in this population.

Remote group therapies for cognitive health in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: Feasible, acceptable, engaging.

Severe cognitive impairments and cognitive distortions are core to schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSDs) and are associated with deteriorated social functioning. Despite well-established efficacy of group psychosocial therapies targeting cognitive health in SSDs, dissemination of these programs remains limited. Remote delivery offers a promising strategy for increasing the programs' accessibility. Yet, little research has evaluated group therapies for cognitive health delivered in this way. Thus, we aimed to assess, from participants' and therapists' perspectives, the feasibility, acceptability, as well as levels and process of engagement in a videoconference delivery of group psychosocial therapies for SSD patients' cognitive health. Participants, outpatients, attended Action Based Cognitive Remediation or Metacognitive Training, both adapted for videoconference. Then, participants and therapists completed post-therapy questionnaires. Of the 28 participants attending at least one session, 75% completed more than half of sessions and seven dropped out. Technology did not appear to significantly hinder participation in the programs. All completing participants reported a positive experience with therapy, 67% were not bothered by the distance from the therapist, and 77% trusted that the information shared was kept confidential. Therapist-rated levels of attention M = 7.5/9 (SD = 1.04), participation M = 6.91/9 (SD = 1.32), and social interactions M = 5.31/9 (SD = 1.96) were satisfactory. Nonetheless, participants indicated that they would have appreciated more social interactions with group members. These positive results validate the earliest stage in the implementation process for remote group therapies targeting cognitive health in SSDs. Remote delivery promises to improve access to therapies targeting cognitive health and, ultimately, facilitate functional recovery for SSD patients.

Immediate and Sustained Outcomes and Moderators Associated With Metacognitive Training for Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: A substantial increase in the number of trials examining metacognitive training (MCT) for psychosis necessitates an updated examination of the outcomes associated with MCT. Objectives: To review the immediate and sustained associations of MCT with proximal (directly targeted) and distal (indirectly influenced) outcomes and assess treatment- and participant-related moderators to identify the potential factors associated with the expected heterogeneity of effect sizes. Data Sources: Eleven electronic databases were searched from 2007 to June 3, 2021 (alert until September 10, 2021). Reference lists of earlier meta-analyses and included reports were screened. Study Selection: Reports examined MCT and included participants with schizophrenia spectrum and related psychotic disorders (1045 reports identified; 281 assessed). There were no age, sex, gender, race and ethnicity, language, or study design restrictions. Two reviewers performed the selection of studies to be analyzed. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline was followed. Data were extracted by 3 reviewers and pooled using random effects models. Hedges g effect sizes were computed. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal tool was used to assess study quality. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proximal outcomes were global positive symptoms, delusions, hallucinations, and cognitive biases. Distal outcomes were self-esteem, negative symptoms, quality of life, well-being, and functioning. Immediate and sustained outcomes were examined. Meta-regressions, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses assessed moderators. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 43 studies (46 reports). Forty reports were synthesized in meta-analysis (N=1816 participants) and 6 reports were included in narrative review. In the studies examined, MCT was associated with positive symptoms (g = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.67), delusions (g = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-0.93), hallucinations (g = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.40), cognitive biases (g = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.29), self-esteem (g = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.31), negative symptoms (g = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.37), and functioning (g = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.12-0.69). These associations were maintained up to 1 year. The quality of life effect size was nonsignificant (g = 0.20; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.47); only 1 study assessed well-being. Publication year was associated with moderated hallucinations (ß = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.07). Overall, narrative review results corroborated meta-analytic findings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, MCT for psychosis was associated with benefits up to 1 year postintervention in several treatment contexts. These findings suggest that MCT may merit integration in treatment guidelines for schizophrenia.

Transforming an Orthopaedic Unit Into an "Age-Friendly" Unit Through Implementation of the American Geriatrics Society's CoCare: Ortho Program.

OBJECTIVE: To transform an inpatient orthopaedic unit into an age-friendly unit for geriatric fracture center (GFC) patients. DESIGN: Pragmatic dissemination study of a continuous quality improvement intervention with episodic data review. SETTING: Large quaternary care university hospital with no on-site geriatrics program and no dedicated geriatric inpatient unit. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals 60 years of age and older with fragility fracture of the native proximal femur hospitalized from July 2017 to June 2020. INTERVENTION: A hospital medicine-orthopaedics comanagement model for a GFC was developed using processes, tools, and education provided by the American Geriatrics Society's AGS CoCare: Ortho program to support the age-friendly 4Ms principles: mentation, mobility, medications, and what matters. Delirium reduction strategies included minimizing sleep interruption through changes in blood draw times, order sets for pain management, and nursing education. Mobility specialists were incorporated to improve early mobilization on the orthopaedic unit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of weight-bearing on postoperative day 1 and frequency of delirium among GFC patients on the orthopaedic unit were compared with those among concurrent GFC patients on other units. RESULTS: Frequency of delirium was 26% among patients on the orthopaedic unit versus 35% among those on other units (P = 0.055). Frequency of weight-bearing on post-operative day 1 was 84% among patients on the orthopaedic unit versus 72% among those on other units (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: AGS CoCare: Ortho is an effective dissemination program for establishing a hospital medicine-orthopaedics comanagement program and making an orthopaedic unit age-friendly in a hospital without onsite geriatricians or a dedicated geriatrics unit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Own the Fall: AOA Critical Issues.

ABSTRACT: Falls are the most common cause of injury to older patients, resulting in >3 million emergency room visits per year and 290,000 hip fractures annually in the United States. Orthopaedic surgeons care for the majority of these patients; however, they are rarely involved in the assessment of fall risk and providing prevention strategies. Falls also occur perioperatively (e.g., in patients with arthritis and those undergoing arthroplasty). Preoperatively, up to 40% of patients awaiting joint arthroplasty sustain a fall, and 20% to 40% have a fall postoperatively. Risk factors for falls include intrinsic factors such as age and comorbidities that are not modifiable as well as extrinsic factors, including medication reconciliation, improvement in the environment, and the management of modifiable comorbidities that can be optimized. Simple in-office fall assessment tools are available that can be adapted for the orthopaedic practice and be used to identify patients who would benefit from rehabilitation. Orthopaedic surgeons should incorporate these strategies to improve care and to reduce fall risk and associated adverse events.

Postacute Management of Older Adults Suffering an Osteoporotic Hip Fracture: A Consensus Statement From the International Geriatric Fracture Society.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients require postacute care (PAC) after a hip fracture. Despite its importance, there is no established consensus regarding the standards of care provided to hip fracture patients in PAC facilities. METHODOLOGY: A writing group was created by professionals from the International Geriatric Fracture Society (IGFS) with representation from other organizations. The focus of the statements included in this article is toward PAC providers located in nursing facilities. Contributions were integrated in a single document that underwent several reviews by each author and then underwent a final review by the lead and senior authors. After this process was completed, the document was appraised by reviewers from IGFS. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: A total of 15 statements were crafted. These statements summarize the best available evidence and is intended to help PAC facilities managing older adults with hip fractures more efficiently, aiming toward overall better outcomes in the areas of function, quality of life, and with less complications that could interfere with their optimal recovery.

The Diverse Implementation of Geriatrics-Orthopedics Comanagement Programs in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Many health systems are establishing geriatrics-orthopedics (Geri-Ortho) comanagement programs; however, there is paucity of published information on existing programs' variations in clinical operations, structure, and reported implementation challenges and perceived successes. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to obtain detailed information about the variety of existing Geri-Ortho comanagement programs in the United States. DESIGN/PARTICPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 44 existing Geri-Ortho comanagement programs, with 23 (52%) of programs responding. MEASUREMENT: Quantitative questions were used to assess operational, staffing, and financial structures; and qualitative questions were used to identify reported challenges and perceived successes of implementation. RESULTS: Programs self-identified as urban (n = 23), academic (n = 20), or nonprofit (n = 22) and as having a level I trauma center (n = 17). Most programs (n = 18) were funded fully by the institution. Fourteen programs used geriatricians, and nine used medicine/hospitalists as the supporting clinical service, whereas approximately half (n = 11) used these services in a true comanagement model. Six universal themes were identified as necessary for program implementation. The most commonly described successes perceived by all respondents were improvements in clinical outcomes and better interdisciplinary relationships. Reported challenges included difficulty in interdisciplinary geriatrics education, difficulty in adherence to protocols, and lack of funding for staffing. CONCLUSIONS: There are diverse types of Geri-Ortho comanagement programs in the United States, although universal elements exist. Many had similar challenges in implementation, and further studies are needed to determine which implementation elements are critical to clinical and financial outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1714-1719, 2020.

Preoperative Noninvasive Cardiac Testing in Older Adults with Hip Fracture: A Multi-Site Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: For older adults with acute hip fracture, use of preoperative noninvasive cardiac testing may lead to delays in surgery, thereby contributing to worse outcomes. Our study objective was to evaluate the preoperative use of pharmacologic stress testing and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) in older adults hospitalized with hip fracture. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Seven hospitals (three tertiary, four community) within a large health system. PARTICIPANTS: Patients, aged 65 years and older, hospitalized with hip fracture (n = 1,079; mean age = 84.2 years; 75% female; 82% white; 36% married). MEASUREMENTS: Data were extracted from electronic medical records. The study evaluated associations between patient factors as well as clinical outcomes (time to surgery [TTS], length of stay [LOS], and in-hospital mortality) and the use of preoperative noninvasive cardiac testing (pharmacologic stress tests or TTE). Descriptive statistics were calculated. Cox regression was performed for both TTS and LOS (evaluated as time-dependent variable); logistic regression was used for in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Although 34.3% (n = 370) had a preoperative TTE, .7% (n = 8) underwent a nuclear stress test and none had a dobutamine stress echocardiogram. Median TTS was 1.1 days (IQR [interquartile range] = .8-1.8 days), median LOS was 5.3 days (IQR = 4.2-7.2 days), and in-hospital mortality was 3% (n = 32). Patients admitted to the medical service had 3.5 times greater odds of undergoing a TTE compared with those on the orthopedic service (P < .001). Community hospitals had almost three times greater odds of preoperative TTE than tertiary centers (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, preoperative TTE was significantly associated with increased TTS (P < .001). No difference in mortality was found between patients with and without a preoperative TTE. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the high rate of TTE in preoperative assessment of older adults with acute hip fracture. Given the association between TTE and longer TTS, further studies must clarify the role of preoperative TTE in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1690-1697, 2020.

Implementation of Hip Fracture Co-Management Program (AGS CoCare: Ortho®) in a Large Health System.

OBJECTIVES: Acute hip fracture is common and leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Co-management programs, such as American Geriatric Society (AGS) CoCare: Ortho®, that optimize perioperative care of older adults, have demonstrated improved outcomes. Yet there is substantial variation in hip fracture care nationally. Our objective was to describe the implementation of AGS CoCare: Ortho® across a large integrated health system. DESIGN: Program implementation of four phases. SETTING: Large integrated health system. PARTICIPANTS: One tertiary and three community hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: The first two phases were communication and system-level planning. The communication phase consisted of getting health system leadership buy-in, creating an interdisciplinary steering committee, and building a business model. The planning phase consisted of choosing process and outcome measures, ensuring accurate and timely data collection, and creating standardized order sets and physician documentation. RESULTS: The second two phases were hospital-level planning and implementation. The planning phase consisted of identifying sites and developing the co-management structure. The implementation phase consisted of identifying and engaging frontline staff, rolling out the program, optimizing workflow, and educating providers. CONCLUSION: The program was implemented at four diverse sites. Major lessons learned included the need for an engaged steering committee to oversee the program; the importance of standardizing order sets and documentation; the utilization of hospitalists as co-managers; the benefit of developing and actively using a data dashboard; the challenge of ensuring wide uptake of education modules; and the need to take proactive steps to improve multidisciplinary communication. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1706-1713, 2020.

Impact of geriatric co-management programmes on outcomes in older surgical patients: update of recent evidence.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To determine the impact of geriatric co-management programmes on outcomes in older patients undergoing a surgical procedure. RECENT FINDINGS: Twelve programmes were identified. Time to surgery was decreased in two of four studies [pooled mean difference = -0.7 h (95% CI, -3.1 to 4.4)]. The incidence of complications was reduced in two of seven studies (pooled absolute risk reduction = -4% (95% CI -10 to 2%)). Length of stay was reduced in four of eight studies [pooled mean difference = -1.4 days (95% CI -2.7 to -0.1)]. In-hospital mortality was reduced in one of six studies [pooled absolute risk reduction = -2% (95% CI -4 to -0%)]. Unplanned hospital readmissions at 30 days follow-up was reduced in two of three studies [pooled absolute risk reduction = -3% (95% CI -5 to -0%)]. SUMMARY: There was a shorter length of stay, less mortality and a lower readmission rate. However, there was uncertainty whether the results are clinically relevant and the GRADE of evidence was low. It was uncertain whether the outcomes time to surgery and complications were improved. The evidence is limited to hip fracture patients.

Quality indicators for in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes: a systematic literature review and international Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: To find consensus on appropriate and feasible structure, process and outcome indicators for the evaluation of in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes. DESIGN: An international two-round Delphi study based on a systematic literature review (searching databases, reference lists, prospective citations and trial registers). SETTING: Western Europe and the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three people with at least 2 years of clinical experience in geriatric co-management were recruited. Twenty-eight experts (16 from the USA and 12 from Europe) participated in both Delphi rounds (85% response rate). MEASURES: Participants rated the indicators on a nine-point scale for their (1) appropriateness and (2) feasibility to use the indicator for the evaluation of geriatric co-management programmes. Indicators were considered appropriate and feasible based on a median score of seven or higher. Consensus was based on the level of agreement using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: In the first round containing 37 indicators, there was consensus on 14 indicators. In the second round containing 44 indicators, there was consensus on 31 indicators (structure=8, process=7, outcome=16). Experts indicated that co-management should start within 24 hours of hospital admission using defined criteria for selecting appropriate patients. Programmes should focus on the prevention and management of geriatric syndromes and complications. Key areas for comprehensive geriatric assessment included cognition/delirium, functionality/mobility, falls, pain, medication and pressure ulcers. Key outcomes for evaluating the programme included length of stay, time to surgery and the incidence of complications. CONCLUSION: The indicators can be used to assess the performance of geriatric co-management programmes and identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the indicators can be used to monitor the implementation and effect of these programmes.

Hospital readmission after hip fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Readmission to the hospital following a hip fracture is common, often involves an adverse event, and strains an already overburdened health care system. OBJECTIVES: To assess the rate of 30-day readmission to the hospital after discharge for care of hip fracture. A secondary objective was measurement of the 30-day mortality rate for those patients readmitted versus those patients not readmitted to the hospital after discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study design was a retrospective review of registry data comparing readmitted patients to those not readmitted after hip fracture. Setting was a university affiliated level 3 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: 1,081 patients aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: rate of readmission, rate of mortality, predictors of readmission. RESULTS: 129 patients (11.9 %) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of their initial discharge date. The primary causes of readmission were surgical in nature for 24/129 (18.6 %) patients and 105/129 (81.4 %) were readmitted for medical or other reasons. Twenty-four (18.6 %) patients who were readmitted died during readmission. The one-year mortality rate for patients readmitted within 30 days was 56.2 vs. a 21.8 % 1-year mortality rate for those patients not readmitted (p < 0.0001). Independent predictors of readmission were age >85 (OR = 1.52; p = 0.03), time to surgery >24 h (OR = 1.50; p = 0.05), Charlson score ≥4 (OR = 1.70; p = 0.04), delirium (OR = 1.65; p = 0.01), dementia (OR = 1.61; p = 0.01), history of arrhythmia with pacemaker placement (OR = 1.75; p = 0.02), and presence of a pre-op arrhythmia (OR = 1.62; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Readmission after hip fracture is harmful and undesirable-18.6 % of readmitted patients died during their readmission and the average length of stay was 8.7 days. Approximately one of every six readmissions was identified as potentially preventable with interventions.

Epidemiology of fragility fractures.

As the world population of older adults-in particular those over age 85-increases, the incidence of fragility fractures will also increase. It is predicted that the worldwide incidence of hip fractures will grow to 6.3 million yearly by 2050. Fractures result in significant financial and personal costs. Older adults who sustain fractures are at risk for functional decline and mortality, both as a function of fractures and their complications and of the frailty of the patients who sustain fractures. Identifying individuals at high risk provides an opportunity for both primary and secondary prevention.

Principles of comanagement and the geriatric fracture center.

This article describes the principles of comanagement in an optimized geriatric fracture center. This is a collaborative model of care that uses patient-centered, protocol-driven care to standardize the care for most patient fragility fractures. This model also uses shared decision making and frequent communication to improve clinically relevant outcomes. The orthopedic and medical teams are equally responsible from admission to discharge and are responsible for daily evaluation and clinical management of the patient.

Anticoagulation management in individuals with hip fracture.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the interventions taken to lower international normalized ratio (INR) in individuals with hip fracture using warfarin before admission for hip fracture surgery in a geriatric fracture center (GFC) and compare outcomes with those of individuals not taking warfarin. DESIGN: Cohort study using retrospective chart review. SETTING: University-affiliated community teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 60 and older admitted to a GFC for surgical repair of a nonpathological, nonperiprosthetic hip fracture between April 2006 and April 2012. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive data collected from a quality improvement registry with additional information for individuals taking warfarin obtained from chart review. RESULTS: Of the 1,080 individuals included in the analysis, 84 (7.8%) were taking warfarin on admission. Participants using warfarin had a higher average Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.8 vs 3.1, P < .001). Atrial fibrillation was the most common indication for anticoagulation (83.3%). Average INR before surgery was 1.7 (range 1.2-3.6). Vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma, or both were given to 100% of those taking warfarin with an admission INR of 2.0 or greater. There was a trend toward longer time to surgery in those taking warfarin than in those not taking warfarin (28.9 vs 21.7 hours, P = .05). Length of stay was longer for those taking warfarin than those not taking warfarin (4.8 vs 4.2 days, P = .04). Neither time to surgery nor length of stay were significantly different after adjustment for baseline comorbidity. Participants taking warfarin were not found to have any significant differences in thromboembolic event rates, bleeding complications rates, mortality, or 30-day readmission after surgery than those not taking warfarin on admission. CONCLUSION: Active management in a GFC model to reverse anticoagulation before surgery may facilitate earlier surgery without increasing observed complications.