Sonographic detection of massive colonic pseudopolyposis in inflammatory bowel diseases.

PURPOSE: Colonic pseudopolyps are a frequent finding in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Yet there are no published data describing the characteristics of pseudopolyposis in intestinal ultrasound (IUS). This study aimed at identifying the key features of pseudopolyposis in IUS. METHODS: This case-control study included 12 patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's colitis with extensive left colon pseudopolyposis and 18 matched IBD patients without pseudopolyps at colonoscopy. Luminal (diameters, thickening, stratification, margins, and vascularity) and intraluminal (vascular signals at color Doppler), and extraluminal (mesenteric fat) parameters of the left colon were compared. Anonymized still images and videos of these patients were blindly reviewed to estimate the accuracy in detecting this condition. RESULTS: Among the IUS parameters assessed, the anteroposterior diameter ≥ 12 mm and the presence of luminal vascular signals were significantly correlated with pseudopolyposis. The detection of both these findings were able to detect extensive pseudopolyposis a sensitivity of 75% (CI 95%: 42.8-94.5%) and a specificity of 100% (CI 95%: 81.5-100%). CONCLUSION: This is the first study describing the IUS features of pseudopolyposis in IBD. The potential use of IUS to assess pseudopolyposis might have an impact on IUS monitoring and surveillance of IBD patients with condition.

THE ROLE OF BOWEL DIARIES IN A "REAL-LIFE" SETTING.

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential advantages of patients' self-recordings of bowel habits in lower digestive disorders, few studies evaluate the relevance of clinical information obtained through bowel diaries in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the role of bowel diaries as an auxiliary diagnostic tool in lower gastrointestinal disorders consultations. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, at the end of their gastroenterology consultation, patients were questioned about their bowel habits and gastrointestinal symptoms. The bowel diary was then filled by the patients at home for 2 weeks. The data collected from the clinical interview and from the bowel diaries were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients participated in the study. Patients underestimated the number of their bowel movements (BM) in the interviews compared with the bowel diaries (P=0.007). There was a poor agreement between stool consistencies described in the interviews and recorded in the diaries (k=0.281). Patients overestimated their straining during evacuation in the interviews compared with the diaries (P=0.012). Regarding the subgroups' analysis, patients with proctological disorders described less BM in their interviews (P=0.033). Straining during evacuation was higher in the interviews of patients without proctological disorders (P=0.028) and in the interviews of more educated patients (P=0.028). CONCLUSION: Overall, there were discrepancies between the clinical interview and the bowel diary regarding the number of BM, the stool consistency and straining. Bowel diaries are therefore a relevant instrument as a complement to the clinical interview to objectify patients' complaints and treat functional gastrointestinal disorders more adequately.

O papel dos diários intestinais na consulta de gastrenterologia / The role of bowel diaries in a "real-life" setting

ABSTRACT Background Despite the potential advantages of patients' self-recordings of bowel habits in lower digestive disorders, few studies evaluate the relevance of clinical information obtained through bowel diaries in clinical practice. Objective The main objective of this study was to evaluate the role of bowel diaries as an auxiliary diagnostic tool in lower gastrointestinal disorders consultations. Methods In this cross-sectional study, at the end of their gastroenterology consultation, patients were questioned about their bowel habits and gastrointestinal symptoms. The bowel diary was then filled by the patients at home for 2 weeks. The data collected from the clinical interview and from the bowel diaries were analyzed. Results Fifty-three patients participated in the study. Patients underestimated the number of their bowel movements (BM) in the interviews compared with the bowel diaries (P=0.007). There was a poor agreement between stool consistencies described in the interviews and recorded in the diaries (k=0.281). Patients overestimated their straining during evacuation in the interviews compared with the diaries (P=0.012). Regarding the subgroups' analysis, patients with proctological disorders described less BM in their interviews (P=0.033). Straining during evacuation was higher in the interviews of patients without proctological disorders (P=0.028) and in the interviews of more educated patients (P=0.028). Conclusion Overall, there were discrepancies between the clinical interview and the bowel diary regarding the number of BM, the stool consistency and straining. Bowel diaries are therefore a relevant instrument as a complement to the clinical interview to objectify patients' complaints and treat functional gastrointestinal disorders more adequately.

RESUMO Contexto: Apesar das potenciais vantagens do diário intestinal como complemento à entrevista clínica, raros estudos avaliam a relevância da informação clínica obtida a partir de diários intestinais na prática clínica. Objetivo Os principais objetivos deste estudo foram avaliar o papel do diário intestinal como ferramenta diagnóstica numa consulta dedicada a patologia digestiva baixa. Métodos Foi realizado um estudo transversal, num período de 3 meses, em que no final das consultas os pacientes foram entrevistados relativamente a dados demográficos, antecedentes clínicos e hábitos e sintomas intestinais. Em seguida, foi solicitado o auto-preenchimento de um diário intestinal durante 2 semanas. Foram comparadas as respostas obtidas na entrevista clínica com os registos dos diários intestinais. Resultados: Cinquenta e três pacientes participaram no estudo. A frequência de evacuações reportada nas entrevistas clínicas e nos diários intestinais dos pacientes foi significativamente diferente (P=0,007). Verificou-se apenas uma concordância mínima entre a consistência das fezes descrita nas entrevistas e registada nos diários (κ=0,281). Em relação ao esforço evacuatório os pacientes sobrestimaram o seu esforço ao evacuar nas entrevistas (P=0,012). Adicionalmente, verificou-se que pacientes com doenças proctológicas descreveram menos evacuações nas suas entrevistas (P=0,033). A descrição do esforço durante a evacuação foi superestimada nas entrevistas de pacientes sem distúrbios proctológicos (P=0,028) e de pacientes com um nível mais elevado de educação (P=0,028). Conclusão: Globalmente verificaram-se discrepâncias entre a entrevista clínica e o diário intestinal dos pacientes em relação ao número de dejeções, à consistência das fezes e ao esforço evacuatório. Assim, esta ferramenta revelou-se uma potencial mais-valia na prática clínica diária, permitindo objetivar as queixas e consequentemente tratar os pacientes de forma mais adequada.

Evaluation of online content of proctological disorders in the Portuguese language

Introduction: health literacy has an increasing relevance as the disseminated access to online contents may impact on community health. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of the online content of benign proctological disorders.Methods: the platforms Google© and YouTube™ were searched using the keywords hemorrhoidal disease, anal fistula, anal fissure, anal pruritus and fecal incontinence. Each page was analyzed for: interactivity, credibility, readability and content adequacy. For each video, the content, reactions and comments of the users were analyzed. Three validated scales were applied: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG); Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices (DISCERN).Results: a total of 127 webpages and 113 videos were evaluated. Forty webpages (31.50 %) included images and ten (37.04 %) had informative videos. The SMOG scale had an average value of 9.91 ± 0.94, which estimates the need for ten years of schooling for comprehension and 64 webpages (52.07 %) presented a reading level higher than the recommended B1. The mean SAM score was 39.46 ± 11.2 % and the DISCERN scale averaged 40.33 ± 5.69, corresponding to a reasonable content. Only 20 pages (15.75 %) included interactivity tools and 44 (34.64 %) contained bibliographic references. The videos posted by patients (n = 67, 59.2 %) had the highest number of views and positive comments whereas videos from health professionals (n = 21; 18.75 %) had the highest proportion of requests for additional information.Discussion: online content regarding benign proctological disorders is globally inappropriate for the health literacy level of the Portuguese population, both at the written and reading levels. (AU)