Tumor-agnostic plasma assay for circulating tumor DNA detects minimal residual disease and predicts outcome in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Forty to fifty percent of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN) relapse despite multimodal treatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) after curative-intent therapy and to identify earlier which patients will progress. We developed a tumor-agnostic plasma ctDNA assay to detect MRD in unselected LA SCCHN with the aim of predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival without the need for tumor sequencing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 26-gene next-generation sequencing panel was constructed that included the most frequently mutated genes in SCCHN and two HPV-16 genes. MRD was assessed in each patient through an in-house informatic workflow informed by somatic mutations identified in the corresponding pre-treatment plasma sample. The presence of MRD was defined as the detection of ctDNA in one plasma sample collected within 1-12 weeks of the end of curative treatment. The primary endpoint was the PFS rate at 2 years. At least 32 patients were planned for inclusion with the hypothesis that PFS at 2 years was >80% in MRD-negative patients and <30% in MRD-positive patients (α = 0.05, ß = 0.9). RESULTS: We sequenced DNA from 116 plasma samples derived from 53 LA SCCHN patients who underwent curative-intent treatment. ctDNA was detected in 41/53 (77%) patients in the pre-treatment samples. Out of these 41 patients, 17 (41%) were MRD positive after treatment. The 2-year PFS rate was 23.53% (9.9% to 55.4%) and 86.6% (73.4% to 100%) in MRD-positive and MRD-negative patients, respectively (P < 0.05). Median survival was 28.37 months (14.30 months-not estimable) for MRD-positive patients and was not reached for the MRD-negative cohort (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Our ctDNA assay detects MRD in LA SCCHN and predicts disease progression and survival without the need for tumor sequencing, making this approach easily applicable in daily practice.

Mutations in the VEGFR3 signaling pathway explain 36% of familial lymphedema.

Lymphedema is caused by dysfunction of lymphatic vessels, leading to disabling swelling that occurs mostly on the extremities. Lymphedema can be either primary (congenital) or secondary (acquired). Familial primary lymphedema commonly segregates in an autosomal dominant or recessive manner. It can also occur in combination with other clinical features. Nine mutated genes have been identified in different isolated or syndromic forms of lymphedema. However, the prevalence of primary lymphedema that can be explained by these genetic alterations is unknown. In this study, we investigated 7 of these putative genes. We screened 78 index patients from families with inherited lymphedema for mutations in FLT4, GJC2, FOXC2, SOX18, GATA2, CCBE1, and PTPN14. Altogether, we discovered 28 mutations explaining 36% of the cases. Additionally, 149 patients with sporadic primary lymphedema were screened for FLT4, FOXC2, SOX18, CCBE1, and PTPN14. Twelve mutations were found that explain 8% of the cases. Still unidentified is the genetic cause of primary lymphedema in 64% of patients with a family history and 92% of sporadic cases. Identification of those genes is important for understanding of etiopathogenesis, stratification of treatments and generation of disease models. Interestingly, most of the proteins that are encoded by the genes mutated in primary lymphedema seem to act in a single functional pathway involving VEGFR3 signaling. This underscores the important role this pathway plays in lymphatic development and function and suggests that the unknown genes also have a role.

Evaluation of Clinical Manifestations in Patients with Severe Lymphedema with and without CCBE1 Mutations.

The lymphedema-lymphangiectasia-intellectual disability (Hennekam) syndrome (HS) is characterised by a widespread congenital lymph vessel dysplasia manifesting as congenital lymphedema of the limbs and intestinal lymphangiectasia, accompanied by unusual facial morphology, variable intellectual disabilities and infrequently malformations. The syndrome is heterogeneous as mutations in the gene CCBE1 have been found responsible for the syndrome in only a subset of patients. We investigated whether it would be possible to predict the presence of a CCBE1 mutation based on phenotype by collecting clinical data of patients diagnosed with HS, with or without a CCBE1 mutation. We report here the results of 13 CCBE1 positive patients, 16 CCBE1 negative patients, who were clinically found to have classical HS, and 8 patients in whom the diagnosis was considered possible, but not certain, and in whom no CCBE1 mutation was identified. We found no statistically significant phenotypic differences between the 2 groups with the clinical HS phenotype, although the degree of lymphatic dysplasia tended to be more pronounced in the mutation positive group. We also screened 158 patients with less widespread and less pronounced forms of lymphatic dysplasia for CCBE1 mutations, and no mutation was detected in this group. Our results suggest that (1) CCBE1 mutations are present only in patients with a likely clinical diagnosis of HS, and not in patients with less marked forms of lymphatic dysplasia, and (2) that there are no major phenotypic differences between HS patients with or without CCBE1 mutations.

Prevalence and spectrum of SDHx mutations in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in patients from Belgium: an update.

Since the early 2000s, the prevalence and spectrum of mutations in genes encoding subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) were reported in large cohorts of patients with pheochromocytoma (PC) and paraganglioma (PGL) from most Western countries. Unfortunately, in Belgium, no equivalent work was performed thus far. Therefore, the aim of the work was to look for mutations in SDHx genes and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with PC and/or PGL from Belgium. Screening of the coding parts of SDHx genes and deletion search were performed in all patients with PC and/or PGL referred to the -Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc from 05/2003 to 05/2011. Genetic screening was performed in 59 unrelated head and neck (hn)PGLs (8 fami-lial) and 53 PCs (7 extra-adrenal; 3 metastatic). In hnPGLs, 10 different SDHD mutations (3 substitutions, 5 deletions, 2 splice site mutations) were detected in 16 patients, including 7 familial cases and 9 apparently sporadic cases. In the same subset, we found 8 different SDHB mutations (5 substitutions, 1 splice site mutation, 1 deletion, 1 duplication) in 10 patients with sporadic hnPGL without evidence of malignancy. No SDHx mutation was detected in patients harboring PCs and no SDHC mutation whatsoever. In conclusion, in our multicentric database of PC-PGLs from Belgium, (i) the prevalence of SDHx mutations was high in hnPGLs (44% in the whole subset, 37% of apparently sporadic cases); (ii) in sporadic cases, the prevalence of SDHB mutations was high (20%), similar to that of SDHD (18%); and (iii) no SDHx mutation was found in a subset of mostly adrenal, benign PCs.