A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Content Validity of COMFORTneo Scale into Brazilian Portuguese.

CONTEXT: The instrument used to assess neonatal pain must be adequate regarding the type of pain, population, country, and language to provide the best evidence-based clinical strategies; however, few neonatal pain instruments have been translated and validated for the Brazilian population. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the COMFORTneo scale into Brazilian Portuguese and to evaluate the content validity of the adapted scale. METHODS: The cross-cultural adaptation process followed six main steps: translation, synthesis of the translations, back-translation, submission to the expert committee, final version pretest, being that 65 individuals participated in this stage, including both healthcare professionals and students, and submission to the committee for process appraisal. Additionally, an equivalence form composed of a four-point Likert scale was sent to each committee participant to calculate the content validity index (CVI). The CVI was obtained as the sum of the items ranked as three or four by the experts divided by the total number of experts. RESULTS: No difficulties were reported in the production of translated versions. The CVI for the final version of the translated instrument was 0.99. The final version was reviewed to correct any possible grammatical errors. The layout was modified as necessary, and instructions on scale scoring were added to facilitate the application, resulting in the COMFORTneo Brazil scale. CONCLUSION: The COMFORTneo scale was properly and cross-culturally adapted into Brazilian Portuguese, reaching semantic, idiomatic, experimental, and conceptual equivalence with the original instrument, and a good CVI.

Canadian and Brazilian Percentile Ranks for the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.

Aim: To verify if there is a difference between the percentile ranks for Brazilian infants compared with norms for Canadian infants on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Method: A cross-sectional study in which 322 Brazilian infants, 2 to 15 months old, were administered the AIMS. Percentile ranks were calculated using norms for Canadian infants and norms from two studies of Brazilian infants. The Friedman test compared the AIMS percentile ranks for the entire sample. For reliability analysis, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. Bland Altman's analysis was applied to compare percentile ranks. Results: Of the 322 evaluations analyzed, there were significant differences (p<.001) between the three percentile ranks compared. The Canadian norms presented the lowest average rating. There was good reliability between the percentile ranks (ICC > 0.75) but low agreement (Bland Altman; p<.001). Conclusion: There are differences between the Brazilian and Canadian percentile ranks and between the Brazilian percentile ranks of 2014 and 2016, and these differences may influence identification of motor development.

Quality Assessment of Neonatal Pain Scales Translated and Validated to Brazilian Portuguese: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to identify and describe the psychometric properties of neonatal pain scales that were translated into Brazilian Portuguese and to verify the methodological quality of these translation, transcultural adaptations and validation. DESIGN: The present study is a systematic review. A systematic search in the literature included studies of development, validation, and transcultural adaptation of neonatal pain scales to Brazilian Portuguese. The instruments must have been developed for health care professionals to evaluate neonatal pain and stress in full-term and preterm newborns. DATA SOURCES: The search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Scielo databases following The PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). REVIEW /ANALYSIS METHODS: A total of 1,479 publications were identified and 5 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with 4 instruments evaluated. For the methodological quality analysis of the measurement properties of the instruments the Consensus-based Standards for Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias checklist was used. The psychometric properties verified were internal consistency, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. RESULTS: Three instruments reviewed were inadequate and one was doubtful. CONCLUSIONS: The neonatal pain scales wich were cross culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese were shown to be of low methodological quality based on COSMIM checklist. Caution should be considered for clinical decisions about pain management judgment coming from these instruments.

Neuroimaging and motor development of twins with congenital microcephaly associated with Zika virus: a case report / Neuroimagem e desenvolvimento motor de gêmeas com microcefalia congênita por Zika virus: estudo de caso

Objective: We aimed to describe a case of congenital microcephaly caused by Zika virus infection in a monozygotic twin pregnancy. Methods: Transfontanelle ultrasonography and cranial computed tomography revealed different lesion patterns for both twins with congenital microcephaly caused by Zika virus infection. Motor development assessments were performed using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and the Gross and Motor Function Measure before, during, and after physiotherapy. Results: The evaluations showed differences in motor acquisition between the twins. The values in the first case were much lower than those in the second case, which showed more motor delay. Conclussion: The present study showed that despite the twins being monozygotic, the effects of neurological lesions as revealed by neuroimaging were worse in the first case, and even with two weekly rehabilitation sessions, motor development over time was considerably worse in the twin in case 1 than in the other twin.

Objetivo: Descrever um caso de microcefalia congênita causada pela infecção do Zika vírus em uma gestação gemelar monozigótica. Métodos: A ultrassonografia transfontanelar e a tomografia computadorizada de crânio revelaram diferentes padrões de lesão para ambos gêmeos com microcefalia congênita causada pela infecção do Zika vírus. As avaliações do desenvolvimento motor foram realizadas por meio da Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta (EMIA) e da Medida de Função Motora Grossa antes, durante e após o tratamento fisioterapêutico. Resultados: As avaliações mostraram diferenças na aquisição motora entre os gêmeos. Os valores nas avaliações do primeiro caso foram bem menores do que os do segundo caso, que apresentou maior atraso motor. Conclusão: O presente estudo mostrou que apesar dos gêmeos serem monozigóticos, os efeitos das lesões neurológicas reveladas por exames de neuroimagem foram piores no primeiro caso, e mesmo com duas sessões semanais de reabilitação, o desenvolvimento motor ao longo do tempo foi consideravelmente pior no gêmeo do caso 1 quando comparado ao caso 2.

Confiabilidade intra e interexaminadores da aplicação da Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta (EMIA) em ambulatório de seguimento de recém-nascidos de risco / Fiabilidad intraevaluadores e interevaluadores de la aplicación de la Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta (EMIA) en un seguimiento ambulatorio de recién nacidos de riesgo / Intra-and inter-examiner reliability of Alberta Infant Motor Scale application in follow-up ambulatory of at-risk newborns

RESUMO A prematuridade é fator de risco para atraso do desenvolvimento motor, e recomenda-se o acompanhamento desses lactentes nos primeiros dois anos de vida. Verificar a confiabilidade intra e interexaminadores da Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta (EMIA) em ambulatório de seguimento de recém-nascidos de risco de uma maternidade pública. Estudo prospectivo realizado em ambulatório de seguimento de recém-nascidos de risco. As avaliações do desenvolvimento motor foram realizadas por meio da EMIA, por dois avaliadores previamente treinados. O Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse (CCI) foi utilizado para análise das confiabilidades. Para a comparação entre as avaliações intraexaminadores foi realizado o Teste T pareado ou Teste de Wilcoxon. O Teste T independente foi utilizado para comparar as avaliações interexaminadores. A correlação entre as variáveis foi analisada a partir do Teste de Pearson ou Spearman. Para avaliar a concordância entre os escores foi realizada análise de Bland Altman. Foram avaliados 31 recém-nascidos pré-termo (RNPT) com idade corrigida média de 8,47 ± 4,49. Não houve diferença significativa entre as avaliações intraexaminadores e interexaminadores. Os valores de CCI se mantiveram acima de 0,88 para a confiabilidade intraexaminadores e interexaminadores. Os escores apresentaram alta concordância, analisada por meio do teste de Bland Altman. EMIA apresentou adequada confiabilidade intra e interexaminadores para avaliação e acompanhamento de RNPT até 18 meses em ambulatório de seguimento de lactentes de risco.

RESUMEN La prematuridad es un factor de riesgo de retraso en el desarrollo motor de los lactantes y se recomienda la monitorización de ellos durante los dos primeros años de vida. Verificar la fiabilidad intraevaluadores e interevaluadores de la Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta (EMIA) en un seguimiento ambulatorio de recién nacidos de riesgo en una maternidad pública brasileña. Estudio prospectivo realizado en un seguimiento ambulatorio de recién nacidos de riesgo. Para evaluar el desarrollo motor, la EMIA fue empleada por dos evaluadores previamente capacitados. Se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación intraclase (CCI) para analizar la fiabilidad. Para comparar las evaluaciones intraevaluadores, se utilizó la prueba T pareada o la prueba de Wilcoxon. La prueba T independiente se utilizó para comparar las evaluaciones interevaluadores. La correlación entre las variables se analizó mediante la prueba de Pearson o Spearman. Para evaluar la concordancia entre los puntajes, se aplicó el análisis de Bland Altman. Se evaluaron a 31 recién nacidos pretérmino (RNPT) con un promedio de edad media corregida de 8,47 ± 4,49. No hubo diferencias significativas entre las evaluaciones intraevaluadores e interevaluadores. Los valores de CCI se mantuvieron por encima de 0,88 para la fiabilidad intraevaluadores e interevaluadores. Los puntajes mostraron un alto nivel de concordancia, que se analizó mediante el Bland Altman. La EMIA apuntó una adecuada fiabilidad intra e interevaluadores para evaluar y monitorear los RNPT hasta 18 meses en seguimiento ambulatorio de lactantes de riesgo.

ABSTRACT Prematurity is a risk factor for delayed motor development, and it is recommended to monitor these infants in the first two years of life. To verify the properties of intra and inter-examiner measurements of AIMS in an outpatient follow-up clinic for newborns at risk in a public maternity hospital. Prospective study conducted in an outpatient follow-up of high-risk newborns. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze reliability. To compare the intra-examiner evaluations, the paired T-test or Wilcoxon test was performed. The independent T-test was used to compare inter-examiner assessments. The correlation between variables was analyzed using the Pearson or Spearman test. The Bland Altman test was performed to assess the concordance between the scores. 31 preterm infants with 8,47 ± 4,49 of corrected age were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the evaluations intra and inter-examiner. The ICC values remained above 0.88 for both intra and inter-examiner evaluation. The scores showed high agreement. AIMS has intra- and inter-examiner reliability for assessing and monitoring preterm newborns for up to 18 months in a follow-up clinic.

Positioning Effects for Procedural Pain Relief in NICU: Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature regarding the effectiveness of different positioning methods for procedural pain relief in neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). DESIGN: A systemized search of the literature was carried out by means of two independent evaluators through the systematic search of electronic index databases. DATA SOURCES: A search for relevant studies was performed in four databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and BVS-BIREME). REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS: Manual searches were conducted on suitable references from the included articles, and 1,941 publications were eligible for the analysis. The flowchart for the articles' selection was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, and in relation to bias risks according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: Based on the inclusion criteria, only 20 publications remained. According to the PEDro scale, 75% of the studies presented good methodological quality, with scores between 6 and 8, and 5% scored ≤4 points. None of them were blinded in relation to the therapies, but all of them performed intergroup statistical comparisons. According to the results of this review, we recommend facilitated tucking by parents (FTP) in NICU of at least 30 minutes duration, starting 15 minutes before, during the painful procedure, and 15 minutes after to relieve pain and to stabilize the physiological, hormonal, and behavioral responses of the newborns. CONCLUSIONS: Positioning should be used as a nonpharmacological strategy for procedural pain relief in newborns. This review showed that facilitated tucking by parents for 30 minutes was the best position for pain relief in premature newborns during procedures in the NICU. Positioning is recommended as a nonpharmacological method for pain relief; FTP of at least 30 minutes duration should be the first positioning choice during procedures in the NICU.