Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aten Primaria ; 21(7): 446-50, 1998 Apr 30.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9656582

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the methods of reporting results of clinical trials affects the physician views on prescribing. DESIGN: Analysis of responses, from a convenience sample of primary care physicians, of one teaching exercise on prescribing intention which showed 5 different methods of reporting results: relative risk reduction (RRR), absolute risk reduction, the percent of event free patients, the number needed to treat (NNT) and RRR and mortality. SETTING: Curses of clinical management in Valencia and Barcelona. RESULTS: The willingness to prescribe was significantly influenced by the way in which data were presented, being major when they were showed as RRR and minor when mortality was added. CONCLUSIONS: The method of reporting trial results has an important influence on the prescribing intention. The reporting of clinical trial results, and their abstracts or citations, should be include the NNT and negative results, for avoiding a subjective bias of treatment effect magnification.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...