Minimalistic approach to left atrial appendage occlusion guided by cardiac computed tomography angiography.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of the minimalistic approach to left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) guided by cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS: Ninety consecutive patients who underwent LAAO, with or without CCTA-guided, were matched (1:2). Each step of the LAAO procedure in the computed tomography (CT) guidance group (CT group) was directed by preprocedural CT planning. In the control group, LAAO was performed using the standard method. All patients were followed up for 12 months, and device surveillance was conducted using CCTA. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included in the analysis, with 30 patients in the CT group and 60 matched patients in the control group. All patients were successfully implanted with Watchman devices. The mean ages for the CT group and the control group were 70.0 ± 9.4 years and 68.4 ± 11.9 years (P = 0.52), respectively. The procedure duration (45.6 ± 10.7 min vs. 58.8 ± 13.0 min, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (7.5 ± 2.4 day vs. 9.6 ± 2.8 day, P = 0.001) in the CT group was significantly shorter compared to the control group. However, the total radiation dose was higher in the CT group compared to the control group (904.9 ± 348.0 mGy vs. 711.9 ± 211.2 mGy, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in periprocedural pericardial effusion (3.3% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.8) between the two groups. The rate of postprocedural adverse events (13.3% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.55) were comparable between both groups at 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CCTA is capable of detailed LAAO procedure planning. Minimalistic LAAO with preprocedural CCTA planning was feasible and safe, with shortened procedure time and acceptable increased radiation and contras consumption. For patients with contraindications to general anesthesia and/or transesophageal echocardiography, this promising method may be an alternative to conventional LAAO.

Feasibility and safety of the direct current cardioversion at the time of left atrial appendage occlusion for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Background: With an increasing number of patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO), more attention is being paid to relieving clinical symptoms and improving the quality of life of these patients. For patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is an alternate, nonpharmacological choice to restore sinus rhythm and relieve clinical symptoms. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of the DCCV at the time of LAAO for patients with AF. Methods: Forty patients were enrolled in the DCCV group undergoing the DCCV at the time of LAAO. The control group undergoing LAAO alone was formed by 1:1 matching. Results: In the DCCV group, cardioversion was immediately successful in 30 (75%) patients, of which 12 (40%) had AF recurrence at the three-month follow-up. The failed-DCCV group was older (73.70 ± 4.74 vs. 62.20 ± 9.01 years old, P = 0.000), had a faster postcardioversion heart rate (88.80 ± 16.58 vs. 70.97 ± 14.73 times, P = 0.03), and had a higher mean HAS-BLED score (4.00 vs. 3.00, P = 0.01) than the successful-DCCV group. No patients experienced periprocedural pericardial effusion, occluder displacement, device embolism, or >5 mm peridevice leakage. One patient experienced a transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the DCCV group during the follow-up. Conclusions: The DCCV at the time of LAAO is feasible and safe for AF patients with contraindications for catheter ablation or AF recurrence after previous catheter ablation to restore the sinus rhythm and relieve clinical symptoms. The DCCV at the time of LAAO is more likely to succeed for younger patients and patients with lower HAS-BLED scores.